Virtual Dyno testing results

themyst · 03-03-2012, 09:12 PM

The two big results are from a beta set of turbos that are coming to market. The 394whp figure is from Cobb Stage2+FMIC aggressive alone which is within expectations for that map even on a Dynojet. All done on the same road to eliminate variables.

The big results were done on a custom JB4 board on Cobb Stage2+FMIC base mapping with 93 octane + meth (90/10 mix), single CM10 nozzle.

If these numbers can be replicated on a real Dynojet, well, fun times for all!

Brey335i · 03-03-2012, 09:16 PM

Nice results. Really hope these results carry over to a real dyno.

themyst · 03-03-2012, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brey335i

Nice results. Really hope these results carry over to a real dyno.

I was dragging my heels with pushing these new turbos, and I finally got on my arse and did something. I did the S2FMIC-only run last and man, it's a huge difference. It felt like I was sitting there waiting for the car to accelerate compared to the all-out runs. Assuming a FBO+meth setup on stock turbos would be around 430whp or so, a 30-40 whp bump over that would be nice if real.

mattsfeir · 03-03-2012, 09:51 PM

Nice numbers, looking forward to more results.

dlbrooks18 · 03-03-2012, 09:58 PM

bryce · 03-03-2012, 10:02 PM

Nice results....I'm curious about actual dyno's on these turbo's, also. Can you provide any info yet on the turbo's?

themyst · 03-03-2012, 10:05 PM

I need to gather all the necessary data to the vendor who will make a proper thread. I am actually going to the drag strip tomorrow with a few well-known members. I did 12.4@118 full weight, stock tires/wheels, and I will be going in the same trim again. I'm hoping for 122 full weight. I'm sure if I took all my seats out, ran Koseis all around perhaps I could add another 3-4 MPH for some glory runs, but no need.

dzenno · 03-03-2012, 10:11 PM

don't forget to bring that vbox with ya

looking forward to your results, good luck!

amclint · 03-03-2012, 10:12 PM

No 60-130 yet?

themyst · 03-03-2012, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dzenno

don't forget to bring that vbox with ya

looking forward to your results, good luck!

It's already in my trunk along with empty meth drum

Quote:

Originally Posted by mykal335xi

No 60-130 yet?

The closest road where I can safely do a 60-130 multiple times is 40 miles away! Maybe I will go next week to do that.

blisstik · 03-03-2012, 11:19 PM

So these turbos are not RBs?

marv85 · 03-04-2012, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blisstik

So these turbos are not RBs?

Nope

bbarnhill · 03-04-2012, 01:11 PM

If the runs are done correctly I think you will all be happy with these turbos as EVERY test that has been done correctly is pretty darn close to real dyno numbers. As is its purpose ... to save you money on dyno pulls. Though I never promote comparing peak numbers as real dynos are misused for that all the time. I wont get on that rant today. Enjoy and keep us posted on the results. Cheers

woodga16 · 03-04-2012, 01:15 PM

myst: you are MT, correct? That's a lot of tq for an AT I would imagine.

RnmEvo9 · 03-04-2012, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woodga16

myst: you are MT, correct? That's a lot of tq for an AT I would imagine.

I am pretty sure he is AT. Can't wait to see more updates on this upgrade.

Brey335i · 03-04-2012, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woodga16

myst: you are MT, correct? That's a lot of tq for an AT I would imagine.

His car is AT

blisstik · 03-04-2012, 02:12 PM

Any more info on the turbos? Same housing as stock?

jpsimon · 03-04-2012, 02:13 PM

Mind posting the logs from the runs?

OpenFlash · 03-04-2012, 04:00 PM

At 480-490whp, themyst should be seeing 125-126mph trap speeds. Curious to hear what he actually ran at the track.

dzenno · 03-04-2012, 04:07 PM

Last I heard it wasn't great for some reason but things may have changed from the last time we chatted today

themyst · 03-04-2012, 07:46 PM

I did very poorly actually, I was running 12.4s like clockwork at trap speeds ranging from 113-116. Not sure what's going on but that's for investigation. I'll report back.

03-03-2012, 09:12 PM	#1
themyst Major General 177 Rep 6,631 Posts Drives: '16 MK7 GTI Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: NYC iTrader: (8)	Virtual Dyno testing results - beta turbo upgrade The two big results are from a beta set of turbos that are coming to market. The 394whp figure is from Cobb Stage2+FMIC aggressive alone which is within expectations for that map even on a Dynojet. All done on the same road to eliminate variables. The big results were done on a custom JB4 board on Cobb Stage2+FMIC base mapping with 93 octane + meth (90/10 mix), single CM10 nozzle. If these numbers can be replicated on a real Dynojet, well, fun times for all! __________________ E90 LCI N54 6AT Last edited by themyst; 03-03-2012 at 09:17 PM.. Reason: grammar
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

03-03-2012, 09:16 PM	#2
Brey335i Banned 112 Rep 4,771 Posts Drives: e46 ///M3 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Austin, TX iTrader: (11)	Nice results. Really hope these results carry over to a real dyno.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 09:51 PM	#4
mattsfeir Lieutenant 37 Rep 458 Posts Drives: 335xi Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: CO iTrader: (2)	Nice numbers, looking forward to more results.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 09:58 PM	#5
dlbrooks18 Brigadier General 161 Rep 3,736 Posts Drives: e90 335i Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Los Angeles iTrader: (2)	__________________ 2008 E90 335
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 10:02 PM	#6
bryce Banned 103 Rep 3,177 Posts Drives: zhp 3-pedal Join Date: May 2010 Location: texas iTrader: (22) Garage List 2005 bmw 330ci zhp [7.34] 2008 bmw 135i- sold [6.00] 2007 bmw 335i- sold [7.14]	Nice results....I'm curious about actual dyno's on these turbo's, also. Can you provide any info yet on the turbo's?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 10:05 PM	#7
themyst Major General 177 Rep 6,631 Posts Drives: '16 MK7 GTI Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: NYC iTrader: (8)	I need to gather all the necessary data to the vendor who will make a proper thread. I am actually going to the drag strip tomorrow with a few well-known members. I did 12.4@118 full weight, stock tires/wheels, and I will be going in the same trim again. I'm hoping for 122 full weight. I'm sure if I took all my seats out, ran Koseis all around perhaps I could add another 3-4 MPH for some glory runs, but no need. __________________ E90 LCI N54 6AT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 10:11 PM	#8
dzenno Banned 273 Rep 5,876 Posts Drives: Join Date: Feb 2006 iTrader: (1)	don't forget to bring that vbox with ya looking forward to your results, good luck!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 10:12 PM	#9
amclint boom 12 Rep 598 Posts Drives: 335xi Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Varies iTrader: (6)	No 60-130 yet?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-03-2012, 11:19 PM	#11
blisstik Lieutenant Colonel 151 Rep 1,677 Posts Drives: E92 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: California iTrader: (14)	So these turbos are not RBs?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 01:11 PM	#13
bbarnhill Spreads VD 2 Rep 23 Posts Drives: 2007 Shelby GT 500 Conv. Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Kansas City, KS iTrader: (0)	If the runs are done correctly I think you will all be happy with these turbos as EVERY test that has been done correctly is pretty darn close to real dyno numbers. As is its purpose ... to save you money on dyno pulls. Though I never promote comparing peak numbers as real dynos are misused for that all the time. I wont get on that rant today. Enjoy and keep us posted on the results. Cheers __________________ Brad Barnhill VIRTUAL DYNO The only way to graph your runs!!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 01:15 PM	#14
woodga16 First Lieutenant 16 Rep 378 Posts Drives: BMW 335i Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: US iTrader: (0)	myst: you are MT, correct? That's a lot of tq for an AT I would imagine.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 02:12 PM	#17
blisstik Lieutenant Colonel 151 Rep 1,677 Posts Drives: E92 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: California iTrader: (14)	Any more info on the turbos? Same housing as stock?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 02:13 PM	#18
jpsimon Team Zissou 3065 Rep 10,197 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	Mind posting the logs from the runs? Last edited by jpsimon; 03-04-2012 at 02:24 PM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 04:00 PM	#19
OpenFlash 1737 Rep 17,960 Posts Drives: A Lot Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay, CA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00] 2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00]	At 480-490whp, themyst should be seeing 125-126mph trap speeds. Curious to hear what he actually ran at the track.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 04:07 PM	#20
dzenno Banned 273 Rep 5,876 Posts Drives: Join Date: Feb 2006 iTrader: (1)	Last I heard it wasn't great for some reason but things may have changed from the last time we chatted today
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-04-2012, 07:46 PM	#21
themyst Major General 177 Rep 6,631 Posts Drives: '16 MK7 GTI Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: NYC iTrader: (8)	I did very poorly actually, I was running 12.4s like clockwork at trap speeds ranging from 113-116. Not sure what's going on but that's for investigation. I'll report back. __________________ E90 LCI N54 6AT
	Appreciate 0 Quote