New pre-beta PROcede maps with revised o2 sim function

jpsimon · 11-18-2009, 06:02 PM

I've just never seen 91 outperform higher octane! stick with the 94 man

Kareem335i · 11-18-2009, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelvin1000

Well, I have been getting cold start misfires with the JB3 and BMS sims as well now. Its funny because it only happens during cold starts and not once everything is warmed up (even at WOT in high gears I get no misfires).

I guess its most likely the spark plugs since I keep getting the problem in cylinder #3 and I do have 30K miles on the original plugs (all tuned). I ordered some new spark plugs to see if this fixes it. Hopefully its not a bad coil or a bad o2 sensor...

Has anyone cured similar cold start misfires issues just by changing the spark plugs?

Hey I get cold start missfires also and when it warms up it's fine and it's only in one of the cylinder I changed out all the plugs and still get the missfire in the same cylinder....i'm going to try the coils chnging them around....if anyone comes up with a soloution please let me know......

zsapphire7 · 11-22-2009, 06:30 PM

any updates on this? so far it seems that i can only keep the cel off if i drive hard. But during stop and go commuting it will still go off

dzenno · 11-22-2009, 07:03 PM

I set mine at 30% and no issues...running very smoothly again...I changed my gas as well, stopped using shell 91...

weeeza · 12-05-2009, 12:03 AM

I just downloaded the 11-02 maps today and the default for stage 1 is 85 UT and 80 IC

that can't be normal can it ? although the car runs great and really flies

shiv says in his documentation that the defaults should be 80 UT and 100 IC

my car is other wise stock with a drop in filter, is it safe to keep running it that way SHIV???

OpenFlash · 12-05-2009, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by weeeza

I just downloaded the 11-02 maps today and the default for stage 1 is 85 UT and 80 IC

that can't be normal can it ? although the car runs great and really flies

shiv says in his documentation that the defaults should be 80 UT and 100 IC

my car is other wise stock with a drop in filter, is it safe to keep running it that way SHIV???

That's should be fine. That's a pretty typical setting where people end up. If you find that it is too aggressive for your set up, you can drop it back to the normal default values of 80% UT and 100% IC.

Shiv

weeeza · 12-05-2009, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

That's should be fine. That's a pretty typical setting where people end up. If you find that it is too aggressive for your set up, you can drop it back to the normal default values of 80% UT and 100% IC.

Shiv

are you kidding I love this setting if you think its safe I would love to keep it...

jale france · 12-06-2009, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

That's should be fine. That's a pretty typical setting where people end up. If you find that it is too aggressive for your set up, you can drop it back to the normal default values of 80% UT and 100% IC.

Shiv

"That's should be fine." => Shiv this log is ok for you ?
On this log I have reduced the parameters (of the map 1 of course) :
overboost limit 16, OB delay: 10 user TM: 70%, 100% ING correction:

munters · 12-06-2009, 04:46 AM

You are always talking about map1 but never your stage. something is wrong. a stage1/map1 with 70% would be in the 12psi max boost.

Kelvin1000 · 12-06-2009, 06:28 AM

This looks terrible. Does your firmware match your maps?

enrita · 12-06-2009, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jale france

"That's should be fine." => Shiv this log is ok for you ?
On this log I have reduced the parameters (of the map 1 of course) :
overboost limit 16, OB delay: 10 user TM: 70%, 100% ING correction:

Shiv still didnt help you with that? amazing....
If i were you i would restart everything from the beginning. reload newest firmware and maps for STAGE 1 . leave all Settings as they come and test the car.

R1000K3 · 12-06-2009, 08:37 AM

I switched from 11-2 to 10-9 today, which has not been used in this car before. I don’t know for sure what was in there before, other than it was said to be a late non-beta version, so it may then have been 7-29.

10-9 works flawlessly with no trouble codes and the general feeling is very good. The engine is silk smooth and VERY responsive

. Unfortunately, I haven’t driven the car for a while (with 11-2) so it is not a real good compare, but the car runs so well that I've decided to stay with 10-9 until a version with new features is released. Some people claims 10-9 is more agile than 11-2 and the butt dyno agrees after today’s run.

The performance and convenience of the Procede Rev II is absolutely great. To you guys that are not running any sort of tune, you can’t fully imagine what you are missing, so hurry put a good tune to the wish list

Big Tom · 12-06-2009, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R1000K3

10-9 works flawlessly with no trouble codes and the general feeling is very good. The engine is silk smooth and VERY responsive.

Now you now what I meant!

jpsimon · 12-06-2009, 10:20 AM

I've never seen logs like this. definitely try reloading firmware/map... try an older version.. some people have had issues with 11-2.. and make sure you're using the proper stage

Quote:

Originally Posted by jale france

"That's should be fine." => Shiv this log is ok for you ?
On this log I have reduced the parameters (of the map 1 of course) :
overboost limit 16, OB delay: 10 user TM: 70%, 100% ING correction:

bmwzimmer · 12-06-2009, 12:02 PM

Can someone PM or email me the 10/9 maps? Use the 7/29 firmware with it??

Thanks

bmwzimmer · 12-06-2009, 12:05 PM

BTW, I had to lower my map settings to 70, 100.
I was boosting 13.8psi max at this setting however the boost keeps oscillating at lower rpms and a 2-4th gear run would knock 2-3 times.

Big Tom · 12-06-2009, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwzimmer

Can someone PM or email me the 10/9 maps? Use the 7/29 firmware with it??
bmwzimmer@yahoo.com
Thanks

Check your email!

There's a special firmware dedicated for the 10-9 maps.
You have everything attached in the email.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwzimmer

BTW, I had to lower my map settings to 70, 100.
I was boosting 13.8psi max at this setting however the boost keeps oscillating at lower rpms and a 2-4th gear run would knock 2-3 times.

Which map are you using?

kentgbr · 12-06-2009, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwzimmer

Can someone PM or email me the 10/9 maps? Use the 7/29 firmware with it??
bmwzimmer@yahoo.com
Thanks

Maps and correct FW sent. Don't use the old (127) firmware with these.

bmwzimmer · 12-06-2009, 12:37 PM

Thanks guys, I was using the 11/2 map that came with the REVII I just got this week. Prior tot his, I was on the 7/29 map with the original procede V3.1 pnp. I sold it recently to get the REV II

Big Tom · 12-06-2009, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwzimmer

Thanks guys, I was using the 11/2 map that came with the REVII I just got this week. Prior tot his, I was on the 7/29 map with the original procede V3.1 pnp. I sold it recently to get the REV II

It seems like I have some problems with my email right now, but I saw kentgbr already have taken care of it...

Try the 10-9 maps and give them some time to adapt.
So far I haven't got any problems with them.

luca335i · 12-06-2009, 01:07 PM

Anybody else with boost oscillation with 10-09 maps?

jpsimon · 12-06-2009, 01:34 PM

it's a shame some of you guys are having these issues... at least the next update should take care of these problems

11-18-2009, 06:02 PM	#89
jpsimon Team Zissou 3065 Rep 10,197 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	I've just never seen 91 outperform higher octane! stick with the 94 man
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-22-2009, 06:30 PM	#91
zsapphire7 Colonel 104 Rep 2,368 Posts Drives: 08 e92 M3 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: SF Bay Area iTrader: (21)	any updates on this? so far it seems that i can only keep the cel off if i drive hard. But during stop and go commuting it will still go off
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-22-2009, 07:03 PM	#92
dzenno Banned 273 Rep 5,876 Posts Drives: Join Date: Feb 2006 iTrader: (1)	I set mine at 30% and no issues...running very smoothly again...I changed my gas as well, stopped using shell 91...
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-05-2009, 12:03 AM	#93
weeeza Private 4 Rep 71 Posts Drives: E93 335i Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: AZ iTrader: (0)	I just downloaded the 11-02 maps today and the default for stage 1 is 85 UT and 80 IC that can't be normal can it ? although the car runs great and really flies shiv says in his documentation that the defaults should be 80 UT and 100 IC my car is other wise stock with a drop in filter, is it safe to keep running it that way SHIV???
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 04:46 AM	#97
munters Captain 11 Rep 677 Posts Drives: E91 335XI AT Dakota Black M Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Switzerland iTrader: (0)	You are always talking about map1 but never your stage. something is wrong. a stage1/map1 with 70% would be in the 12psi max boost. __________________ 59 Corvette, 72 240Z, 73 Espada, ZXR
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 06:28 AM	#98
Kelvin1000 Major 253 Rep 1,297 Posts Drives: 2019 BMW M2 Competition MT Hoc Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Miami, FL iTrader: (4)	This looks terrible. Does your firmware match your maps?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 08:37 AM	#100
R1000K3 Major 56 Rep 1,311 Posts Drives: 335i MT Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: USA iTrader: (0)	I switched from 11-2 to 10-9 today, which has not been used in this car before. I don’t know for sure what was in there before, other than it was said to be a late non-beta version, so it may then have been 7-29. 10-9 works flawlessly with no trouble codes and the general feeling is very good. The engine is silk smooth and VERY responsive . Unfortunately, I haven’t driven the car for a while (with 11-2) so it is not a real good compare, but the car runs so well that I've decided to stay with 10-9 until a version with new features is released. Some people claims 10-9 is more agile than 11-2 and the butt dyno agrees after today’s run. The performance and convenience of the Procede Rev II is absolutely great. To you guys that are not running any sort of tune, you can’t fully imagine what you are missing, so hurry put a good tune to the wish list
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 12:02 PM	#103
bmwzimmer Major 35 Rep 1,084 Posts Drives: 335 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 91 octane states iTrader: (0)	Can someone PM or email me the 10/9 maps? Use the 7/29 firmware with it?? Thanks Last edited by bmwzimmer; 12-06-2009 at 12:39 PM.. Reason: removed email
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 12:05 PM	#104
bmwzimmer Major 35 Rep 1,084 Posts Drives: 335 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 91 octane states iTrader: (0)	BTW, I had to lower my map settings to 70, 100. I was boosting 13.8psi max at this setting however the boost keeps oscillating at lower rpms and a 2-4th gear run would knock 2-3 times. __________________ _________________________________________________ 09 E90 LCI Msport, European Delivery
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 12:37 PM	#107
bmwzimmer Major 35 Rep 1,084 Posts Drives: 335 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: 91 octane states iTrader: (0)	Thanks guys, I was using the 11/2 map that came with the REVII I just got this week. Prior tot his, I was on the 7/29 map with the original procede V3.1 pnp. I sold it recently to get the REV II __________________ _________________________________________________ 09 E90 LCI Msport, European Delivery
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 01:07 PM	#109
luca335i Major 57 Rep 1,193 Posts Drives: 335I Sedan Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Unknown iTrader: (3)	Anybody else with boost oscillation with 10-09 maps? __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-06-2009, 01:34 PM	#110
jpsimon Team Zissou 3065 Rep 10,197 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	it's a shame some of you guys are having these issues... at least the next update should take care of these problems
	Appreciate 0 Quote