|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
BMW's Steptronic Compared to Audi's S-tronic
|
|
10-31-2011, 07:58 PM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
24
Rep 254
Posts
Drives: X5 Xdrive 3.0D
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Perth, WA
|
BMW's Steptronic Compared to Audi's S-tronic
My sister recently acquired a new A3 TDI and I've been trying to compare it with my 320d to see whats a better bang for your buck. I think we all know the answer but still.
Biggest thing i noticed was Audi's Twin Clutch S-tronic gearbox. IMO it seems to be miles ahead of the Steptronic in the BM's. The fact that it loses absolutely no momentum during gear changes really caught my attention. Although my cars gear changes are faultless, it still seems to, under full load, slip quite a bit going into higher gears. On the other hand i believe the audi's/volkswagon's change through the gears too quickly, unless in sports mode. Perhaps this is to keep economy down. Just wondering what every1's views were on BMW's choice to stick with the conventional Steptronic for so long? After all the DCT has been available on selected cars since the LCI model came out. Hopefully when the F30's come out they will have the DCT's as Standard
__________________
Current:
White E70 LCI X5 Previous: White LCI 320d Space Grey LCI 320d |
10-31-2011, 08:04 PM | #2 |
Banned
43
Rep 1,719
Posts |
As I started reading I though you were comparing apples and oranges, with AT V S-tronic as you should be comparing it with the DCT.
As for why BMW still have At and DCT...... marketing ??? I for one waited for the 335 to start shipping with the DCT before I bought one. love that box |
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 08:14 PM | #3 | |
Second Lieutenant
24
Rep 254
Posts
Drives: X5 Xdrive 3.0D
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Perth, WA
|
Quote:
Ive heard the DCT's are wicked!!?
__________________
Current:
White E70 LCI X5 Previous: White LCI 320d Space Grey LCI 320d |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 09:36 PM | #5 |
Banned
43
Rep 1,719
Posts |
Can't comment on the 'is' but I can say I amm 100% happy on a tuned 335i. You get a dual 'sport' mode if you like. The standard sport plus you can slide the selector knob to s/m for sport shift/manual mode for even quicker shifts. Oh plus you get an extra cog
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 09:57 PM | #6 |
Major General
808
Rep 5,530
Posts |
I think the F30 is gonna run the 8speed auto (still a slushbox, not a DCT)... I've driven the 8speed in the F10 and it's a fantastic gearbox. Simpler and cheaper than a DCT and I can't fault it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 10:25 PM | #7 |
New Member
3
Rep 28
Posts |
I have the DCT in my 09 335i and it's an awesome box. On e of the reasons I bought the car & it hasn't disappointed. Once driving a DCT-type box you will never buy a manual again!
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2011, 11:02 PM | #8 | ||
Lord Captain Commander
110
Rep 3,093
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
If you try an automatic from a x35i BMW, you'd be hard pressed to distinguish whether it's an auto or a DCT. The slushbox in your 320d is geared towards smooth driving and economy and is a completely different ZF unit, so that's why it might feel a bit sluggish compared to the S-tronic. Torque converter autos have become so good these days that BMW does not see the need to introduce DCT across the whole range. I don't see the need either. The ZF on bmroxm5's 135i is so good that it really doesn't need DCT. In sports mode, it locks up the torque converter past 2nd gear so it becomes a direct link between the engine and wheels, and gets rid of the 'slip' that you speak off. Gear changes give the same 'kick in the ass' feel that I experienced with dual clutch equipped VWs. For shift times, the steptronic is 200ms consistent for any up gearchange. DSG/DCT are harder to determine, since their shift times are highly variable depending on whether the computer predicted the correct gear change and pre-loaded the gear. The fastest they can achieve is in the 50-80ms range for a pre-loaded gear, but that can go up to anywhere up to 500ms, slower than the steptronic. Of course in a straight line drag race, you'd really be smashing through the gears in a dual clutch system. Don't believe the 8ms figure VW quote, because that is completely ridiculous. That is the time taken for the synchros to move and does not take into account the clutching action. As for downchanges, the step takes about 600ms due to the need to blip the throttle. The dual clutches take the same amount of time, since their setup offers no advantages due to the fact that they also have to wait for the throttle blip. HOWEVER, if you make an unexpected downchange (such as 6th to 2nd, which in dual clutches is on the same shaft) that can take up to 900ms, slower than a manual driver! On the topic of throttle blips, the steptronic does that extremely well and feels exactly the same as the DCT. Combine this with the low speed shunting and jerkiness inherent to dual clutch systems that is non-existent in an auto, then BMW is doing it right for sticking with the torque converter. Just look at the issues VW owners have with their DSGs and you'll see why. This is not taking into account the maintenance cost for clutchpacks and the like, plus the low tolerance for increased power via mods. An auto is maintenance free and can usually take anything you throw at it with a simple ATF change. The new 8speed ZF in the new range of BMWs are even better - shift times are apparently down to 100ms, which is pretty much on par with the best dual clutch systems. To put this into perspective, the DSG on the old Audi TT had a 200ms shift time.
__________________
E82 135i M-sport: SGM/6MT/Black |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 12:21 AM | #10 | |
Second Lieutenant
24
Rep 254
Posts
Drives: X5 Xdrive 3.0D
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Perth, WA
|
Quote:
Looking forward to driving the new F30 320d 8sp aye. The car's really grown on me. Everythins looks good except that fugly after though screen.
__________________
Current:
White E70 LCI X5 Previous: White LCI 320d Space Grey LCI 320d |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 12:52 AM | #11 | |
Major General
156
Rep 4,995
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 01:54 AM | #12 |
Colonel
232
Rep 2,643
Posts |
Jeef, Thanks for the informative post.
I am a fan of DCT. I think it would be better than a conventional auto if the car is going to be used for track days. Its about 10kg lighter than the ZF Auto, and I expect it wouldn't have issues with overheating in heavy use. Personally I like using a manual transmission on the roads, but I think I'd be better off with the DCT for track days. For use in traffic I found the DCT in the 135i to be super smooth when I did a 20 min test drive at the dealer. Maybe there's something I don't know about, but I couldn't figure out why people criticise the DCT for jerkiness. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 02:07 AM | #13 | ||
Lord Captain Commander
110
Rep 3,093
Posts |
Quote:
Damnit! Quote:
Dual clutch systems in BMWs are good compared to the others I think because the computer tends to slip the clutch a bit more, but compared to an auto or a good manual driver, the difference is still obvious. Try reverse parking up a slope with a DSG car, I had quite a laugh watching my friend trying to do it in his DSG equipped Golf GTI. The fact is, the computer can only adjust clutch input reactively (and to a very limited extent proactively based on incline sensors) but a manual driver can adjust the clutch proactively based on current conditions and what he can see coming up. An auto of course doesn't have that issue since it's always connected to the engine. Many these days don't seem to be aware that most 'sporty' autos lock up the torque converter to prevent 'slip' and power loss after changing from 1st to 2nd in sport mode. It makes them feel like automated manuals as they slam thru the gears. Out of sport mode in drive, the torque converter lockup only happens during cruising to save fuel and 'slurs' the gearchanges to give that unmatched creaminess.
__________________
E82 135i M-sport: SGM/6MT/Black |
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-01-2012, 07:59 AM | #14 |
New Member
0
Rep 20
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-01-2012, 08:02 AM | #15 | |
New Member
0
Rep 20
Posts |
Quote:
PS: The SST in the EVO is an embarrassment for the Dual Clutch crowd. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-01-2012, 04:53 PM | #16 | |
Lord Captain Commander
110
Rep 3,093
Posts |
Quote:
In terms of smoothness, it can't compare to a simple torque converter auto. Let's not discuss maintenance
__________________
E82 135i M-sport: SGM/6MT/Black |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-07-2012, 03:45 AM | #17 |
Enlisted Member
7
Rep 39
Posts
Drives: X3 30D
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
|
DSG
Hi All
We drive a 7 speed Skoda Fabia. Yes a whole 77Kw. It is a mighty little car, much nicer to drive than Mazda 3, Corolla etc. It goes very well once it is doing five KPH. Just don't park where you have to reverse to get out!! Ease the excellarator off and the clutch disengages, touch the brake and the clutch disengages. If we have to park on a slope we just face up hill or find another park! KF |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2012, 04:15 PM | #19 |
Private
5
Rep 95
Posts |
I think traditional automatic suppliers (ZF for example) saw the light years ago when automatic clutch manual tech was reaching reliability levels approaching mass sale... the last 5 years has seen dramatic improvement in traditional auto tech (200ms shift time for the new ZF 8 speeder for example)... makes me wonder if I'd ever take the risk of the extra tech in an automatic clutch box as a daily driver.
Sydney Harbour Bridge tow truck drivers have mentioned to me in the past that they rank VW DSGs as one of the most unreliable cars they get to tow. I can't wait to try the new F30 auto box... I just didn't see improvement from the E46 5AT to the E90 6AT but I am expecting to be blown away by the F30 8AT. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2012, 04:37 AM | #20 |
Enlisted Member
7
Rep 39
Posts
Drives: X3 30D
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
|
DSG vs ZF
Hi All
We have the seven speed DSG in the Skoda, other than trying to reverse out of a up hill car park, we though that the DSG performed better than out current six speed ZF. We had driven the ZF transmission car for over 12,000km before driving it down a hill. Yes we live on the largest piece of flat land in the world. The ZF will change down al by itself on a down hill road to maintain the cruise control speed, The Skoda requires the brakes to be used in a down hill section to maintain speed. The DSG enables VW's and Skoda's to out perform there competitors, our 77Kw Skoda is quicker than 100kw Mazda's and Corolla's!. Someone suggested that you can use the hand brake to restrict your speed when reversing up a hill. I asked the service manager how you got on backing a $250,000 A8, and he suggested using the hand brake. This is only in the sort of tight maneuvours that you would have to slip the clutch in a manual. A torque converter trany would have no trouble. The six speed VW DSG had "issues", the same guys advised that they had 7 speed DSG's with over 200,000km with no problems. We look forward to next weeks arrival of the X3 3.0D to find out if we think that the 8 speed ZF is better than the 7 speed DSG. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|