|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
BMS Dual Cone Intake cause any issues?
|
|
11-28-2010, 07:43 AM | #4 | |
Captain
58
Rep 665
Posts |
Quote:
OP, I had those DCIs on my 535i for a few weeks. I don't have any other mods so I wasn't expecting any kind of performance gain, but was looking forward to hearing the turbos whine a bit. Maybe it was because the 535i has more insulation, but I really couldn't hear much of a sound difference in most situation and there did seem to be a bit less low end torque with them installed. The warranty concerns didn't outweigh the benefits in my opinion so I pulled them off for now. I'll put them back on once the warranty is done and I get a tune.
__________________
2010 535i M Sport - Platinum Gray/Dakota Black/Anthracite Bamboo
2016 Jaguar F-Type S AWD - Polar White/Cirrus |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 10:27 AM | #5 | |
SOFLO CODING
199
Rep 3,587
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 10:30 AM | #6 |
Major General
273
Rep 5,751
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 10:38 AM | #7 |
Banned
127
Rep 4,732
Posts |
Well you shouldnt be going into the dealer every few days... but you can go back to stock with out anyone knowing. And no, it doesnt cause problems. Also, I have not noticed any power loss in the low RPM's.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 11:53 AM | #8 |
Brigadier General
596
Rep 3,386
Posts |
if someone can please chime in and explain why it causes loss of low end torque it would be helpful. i emailed terry at burger motorsports and he said theres improved power throughout the entire power band and i looked at the dyno which confirmed that. so can someone please use evidence to show that it in fact causes a loss of low end power. thanks
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2010, 11:56 AM | #9 | |
Banned
127
Rep 4,732
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 12:05 PM | #10 |
Colonel
184
Rep 2,320
Posts |
i have 2 dynos with baseline (no dci) stock box and then with dcis dont think that my dynos graphs will help
__________________
E92 335i Black Saphire 6MT PROcede V5, BMS DCI, Big Tom IC, AR CL-DP's 3", AR Design OC, Forge DV's, OEM M3 side skirts, BMW Performance Wheels 19 inch 269 Black Gloss+Continental ContiSportContact 5P (400hp and 550nm) https://www.youtube.com/user/aistis7..._as=subscriber
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 01:06 PM | #12 |
Major
36
Rep 1,054
Posts |
i think that some compression (resistance is expected by the DME and the DCI removes all resistance) is lost when you remove the box. This lets the engine breath much better through the mid range and up top but the velocity of the air on take off is a bit slower because there is so much more room for air to flow. Once it gets going everything is aok! I have heard tons of reports of minor throttle response loss during take off. If you want cones and resistance (great for take off but chokes you out in the midrange and up top) I have been running bms dci for some time now and I love it. I even made a heat sheild for it but realized that my car likes more air....all it can get...it would rather have lots of warm air than just a box full of cold!
I have a variation of DCI available for sale... AEM Brute Force Cones....and the BMS couplers... pm if you would like to save on DCI. My cones are not open ended so anyone stock, jb+ or running 14psi or less will have better throttle response with these closed end cones.(in my opinion) I have been running 16.5 psi with them just fine but switched recently to some open ended cones and noticed a difference. Cones are indestructable! I got them becuase I knew I'd be working in that area on my charge pipe, DVs and manifold but now I am done and have installed more delicate, wire framed, open faced cones from Vibrant. Throttle isn't as touchy but mid range and top end seem to keep giving more and more each pull.
__________________
JB4 beta 15 ohms FSB,AEM inline filter/ CM 10, ETS fmic, ER custom made charge pipe,TSW Donnington 18's,Simitumo HTRZ3, Injen DCI, AR DPs, Forge DVs, AA SLD, Koni FSD, ZSP springs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 01:49 PM | #13 |
Colonel
184
Rep 2,320
Posts |
dci are realy good it was my first mod related with engine also nice sound
__________________
E92 335i Black Saphire 6MT PROcede V5, BMS DCI, Big Tom IC, AR CL-DP's 3", AR Design OC, Forge DV's, OEM M3 side skirts, BMW Performance Wheels 19 inch 269 Black Gloss+Continental ContiSportContact 5P (400hp and 550nm) https://www.youtube.com/user/aistis7..._as=subscriber
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 02:36 PM | #14 |
Banned
34
Rep 1,284
Posts |
I havn't noticed any sound difference, I mean maybe a little but not like I've expected at all , when you install and intake on a japanese v6 it gives you a crazy sound with 335i it's mehhhhhh
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 02:44 PM | #15 |
Banned
127
Rep 4,732
Posts |
But you are still getting more airflow. Thats why you purchase it, not for sound.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 02:51 PM | #16 |
Colonel
75
Rep 2,491
Posts
Drives: 991 C2S Guards Red
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
|
I no longer have my DCI, but if you pair it with a tune the sound is very noticeable. People on the sidewalk/ near the street would stare when I applied a lot of throttle and that was before I had exhaust. I only say this because you need a tune with the DCI to really hear the difference (and its a big difference). I got the DCI more for the performance aspect though Its a decent mod, but I read a lot about heatsoak with the DCI, so until I get a cold air intake, I am using a K&N drop in and am happy with it. Although the DCI install is very simple and easy, just make sure the tubes fit tight, you don't want any debris getting in the engine
__________________
991.1 C2S PDK, Guards Red | PDCC | Sport Chrono + | Clear Tail Lights | Alcantara Steering Wheel | HRE FF01 | TechArt Springs | Sport Exhaust
Previous: Porsche 997 Turbo 6MT, Atlas Gray | Cobb Stage 2 | HRE FF01 | Europipe Stg. 2 Exhaust | GMG LMS Rollbar | GT2 Exhaust Tips | Pagid RS-29 | Rennline Pedals | SSK 997.2 Track Car, heavily modded & E92 M3 DCT, still miss her daily & E92 335i heavily modded |
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 04:21 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
109
Rep 1,948
Posts |
Its all about heatsoak. On a dyno, they are running fans etc with the hood open (for most cases) so it never really shows. it. It may be little but when you take off low end, you are sucking in hot air from the engine as the cold air isn't being pulled into the engine yet. Mid-range and above the car is moving creating airflow thus cooler air. I believe there were multiple threads on this and one by Former Boosted IS where he compares his Stett CAI to the DCI, you can see a minor but definite increase witht the Stett pipe.
I have a vented hood and then decided to get the Dinan CAI and it does make a difference. Again, not huge but every little bit helps plus it looks great! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 04:52 PM | #18 |
Major
36
Rep 1,054
Posts |
tons of threads on heat soak as well.... turbo cars just need lots of air.... cold is better yes, but lots of air is better still... there are tons of posts depicting that hundreds you spend on cai is hardly worth the 5 or 6 whp you get from having cold air.
DCI 8-15 whp with tune $99 Stett CAI 10-22 whp with a tune $449 Yes the stett is better, no doubt but $400 better?? you'll get much more if you buy a basic meth kit and dci for the same money... 45whp on map 5 I think there may be a point at which when you have a solid FMIC and meth that the DCI will render more air for more whp when compaired to the Stett CAI with the exact same mods. This is a topic for discussion for sure..... I am slowly on my way to having both meth and fmic... once I get there, I think I will be glad that I have DCI instead of CAI. The long tubes associated with CAI always are going to restrict air intake and make the turbos work a bit harder, even if they are sucking air from a cold spot in the bumper. DCI will not hurt your car, there is some throttle lag but hardly noticable and once you get moving....It has less restriction on the incoming air than any other intake no matter what the price. It is an excellent first, 2nd or 3rd mod and allows room from growth, getting steadily more and more effective the harder you push the car. My favorite intake...INJEN dci with plenium to send air to one of the cones, short tubes for low restriction, big cones for lots of air, velocity stack for even less restriction of air. It to is $400 and in no way $300 better than BMS or Vishnu DCI. Thats why I don't have one. If I could pick one up used for say $200... I think its $100 better 3-5whp but thats it. Spend any more on an Intake and you may as well get a DINAN or Simota carbon fiber box to show off how much money you have to waste....(very common among bmw owners)
__________________
JB4 beta 15 ohms FSB,AEM inline filter/ CM 10, ETS fmic, ER custom made charge pipe,TSW Donnington 18's,Simitumo HTRZ3, Injen DCI, AR DPs, Forge DVs, AA SLD, Koni FSD, ZSP springs.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 05:24 PM | #19 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
109
Rep 1,948
Posts |
Quote:
Me likey go very very fast.... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 08:05 PM | #20 | |
Banned
114
Rep 2,428
Posts |
Quote:
Also not sure where the $449 for the Stett CAI came from. I bought it for $375 a couple weeks ago. Does it make the turbos work harder/is the air coming in 'insufficient'??? My testing and WGDC logs, as well as FBIS' testing suggest that the Stett CAI does NOT make the turbos work harder. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2010, 08:20 PM | #21 | |
Banned
127
Rep 4,732
Posts |
Quote:
The throttle response is increased. And while some dynos may show as little as 1 whp gain, it does not reduce HP or TQ. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|