|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Quick Review BMS 1.2 beta!
|
|
12-01-2008, 03:54 PM | #67 | |
Major General
152
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
In your scenario, either the map had serious retard occuring in it or something else happened. This should be up for a different discussion though and not in this thread. There will be significant dicussions in this arena soon though and comparisons to products, previous statements and actual occurances. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-01-2008, 04:04 PM | #68 |
Brigadier General
163
Rep 4,311
Posts
Drives: Supercharged E90 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SL,UT
|
OMG I CANT WAIT!
2 more weeks.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-01-2008, 04:07 PM | #69 | |
205
Rep 9,339
Posts |
Quote:
I will note the differences i experience from the standard 1.1 map vs. 1.1 w/ lagfix 2.0, and report back. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-01-2008, 04:08 PM | #70 |
Captain
296
Rep 657
Posts |
+1 I just love the map switching feature.
__________________
/// E92 | JB4 | UR DP | BMS DCI | H&R | LC Z2S | |
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 07:30 AM | #72 |
HALA MADRID!
937
Rep 2,877
Posts |
you sir, are a gentleman, and a scholar!
__________________
F87 M2 Competition, Sunset Orange, Exc, DCT. **SOLD** F80 M3 Mineral Grey/Sakir Orange, Exc, DCT... ED 6/2015 **SOLD**E90 M3, Interlagos Blue / M individual two-tone, ZCP, ZP2, ZCV, DCT, ED. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 08:03 AM | #73 |
.
697
Rep 3,948
Posts |
I know you and Shiv have stated this repeatedly, but why is it that the car seems stronger the next day or two after making a change? Inaccurate butt dynos again? Are people imagining things when they say that they don't feel much difference at first, and then the next day, DSC warnings are flashing in 2nd gear, etc, that did occur previous to the tune change? So if it isn't these "DME adapatation values" that you cite, then what could be the reason?
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 08:07 AM | #74 | |
Major General
152
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
But anyway, this should all be very clear hopefully in just a couple of months. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 08:12 AM | #75 | |
.
697
Rep 3,948
Posts |
Quote:
Sounds cool. Tell you what, if that track isn't a zoo with hour long lines this weekend, I will try and make the first run unadapted, and we will see if the traps increase on corresponding runs. This will then give us a pretty good correlation between trap speeds and HP increases.
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 08:14 AM | #76 | |
Major General
152
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 11:24 AM | #77 | ||
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep 778
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 12:09 PM | #78 |
Major General
152
Rep 5,780
Posts |
This is when going from stock to V3. Not when you just change maps which increase or decrease boost one PSI or so.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 12:52 PM | #79 | |
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep 778
Posts |
Quote:
I use the optimal map all the time. I see the map switching useful only when changing to race gas map after filling in race gas. (Or changing auxiliary mods and selecting appropriate map, but that happens like once a year..). Anyways, its nice that the switcher is readily available if you happen to need it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 02:00 PM | #80 | |
Lieutenant
4
Rep 479
Posts |
Quote:
When I dynoed my car, I was gaining 5 whp at a time after each run. This was of course on the same map not changing boost. Can you just imagine how much longer it would to take for optimization after a boost increase?
__________________
Your friendly SF Bay Area JB3 Installer
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 02:26 PM | #81 | |
Major General
152
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
Air or boost control, this is an area where adaptation does take some time. But this is based on a change of the method of controlling boost and not the actual amount; for instance, going from stock to adding a tune. The reason for this is in the logic and adaptive algorithms the DME uses; call it auto-tuning. But once the control parameters are learned, changing maps from running 13 PSI to 14 PSI will not impact this adaptation. In addition, this is generally for the smoothness of the power and not the peak level. Fuel is another area and one we can be thankful for does adapt nearly instantly. Due to the use of Wideband sensors, the STFT can be seen to adjust immediately. In fact, the earlier versions of most tunes relied upon this in the O2 sensor signal attenuation to get additional fuel in there. It is also how the newer detection programs in the DME attempt to determine there is a tune involved. The last area is spark and involves a couple of adaptation channels; multiple for different loads. This is the caveat area that isn't 100% either way as you have to look at what is occurring. Think of it being similar to fuel trims, the DME also tests octane and bumps up timing to a certain extent. If knock events are measured, timing is pulled and then slowly added back in. But slowly is a relative term to the speed of which the DME is processing data. Any proper tune will retard timing to a level where the DME believes it is stock and running in the same range. Add some 100 octane and push it, the DME will respond by slowly bumping up timing but only to a certain point and should be realized in just a couple of pulls. There are limits to how much timing the DME will add in though. But run the same octane level and just bump the boost up 1 PSI, the tune should respond correctly to keep the DME in range it is comfortable with; roughly stock. That said, the JB1 and JB2 relied heavily on the DME's ability to adapt rather quickly, essentially immediately. If it didn't people would have regularly gotten check engine lights and/or audible knock. This is why Terry claimed he did not need CPS phase offsetting; the DME was quick enough to take care of it. This changed in the JB3 though as preventative measures were taken by inducing that offset. Point being, significant changes may require some adaptation but something a few WOT pulls would take care off. Minor changes, like a small bump in boost, will not require any wait time. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 02:45 PM | #82 | |
Lieutenant
4
Rep 479
Posts |
Quote:
WOW, that was a novel of a response. All your points are affected by how much boost there is. Adaptation is not as instant, it takes a few WOT pulls for the DME to "learn". Plus low and high boost maps differ by more than 0.5 to 1 psi.
__________________
Your friendly SF Bay Area JB3 Installer
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2008, 02:54 PM | #83 | |
Major General
152
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
Actually only one point dealt with the boost; the first one. And the tune should account for the other changes so the DME doesn't have to. And call it 2 PSI, the tune should adjust fuel and spark accordingly so no wait time is needed in the DME. One disconnect may be in the tunes we are referring to. Yes, in the JB1 and JB2 it would have some adaptation time regarding spark as the DME had to pull timing and then slowly add it back in. I assumed the JB3 was more proactive in this regard, similar to the PROcede. Perhaps I should reserve judgement on the JB3 until I get my hands on one. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|