|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
'HiFi' outputs: SQ and rethinking conventional wisdom
|
|
01-27-2014, 03:07 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
281
Rep 4,121
Posts |
'HiFi' outputs: SQ and rethinking conventional wisdom
Primarily looking for input from those with DIRECT experience or knowledge.
I am forming a hypothesis that the HiFi configuration is not everything it's cracked up to be. While we (me-in my sticky) advocate recoding to HiFi as an optimal or near-optimal solution, I am beginning to lose faith that that is the case in the e90. While the HiFi signal quality is flat - which is its primary benefit, it may not be as good as other alternatives. In support I'll offer the following examples Technic - JL HD install on customer's car, recoded to Hifi, noted that 'something was missing' in terms of SQ. BMW325i-replaced HiFi system with aftermarket and noted improved SQ VP electricity - noted that when he switched from HiFi to DA2, the SQ jump was immediately noticeable. Other posters have also suggested better SQ from aftermarket HU. Taibanl - Its been nearly two years since I went from a 'stereo' coded system to HiFi. While I also made other changes at the time (JL XD --> HD), I think i had a better quality (explanation forthcoming - be patient) signal in the old configuration. I have never had the same SQ from my existing setup which is easily 3x-5x the price as my old setup. I think this is due to the SN ratio. The MS-8 has a slightly better SN ratio with use of the low-level inputs vs the speaker inputs. However, that SN ratio only applies to the relevant signal that it receives. In my case, having gone from speaker level in to low level, I think the SN ratio is worse. That is to say that I think the SOURCE SN ratio is better in stereo than it is in Hifi. It is well documented that speaker signals (AC?) are better shielded from noise than low-level (DC?) <--may have that backwards. Andy Weymeyer has a discussion on DIYMA why RCA's should be abandoned for speaker outs. It's really the OEM curve's that are the problem - not the speaker outs? So I think going to HiFi may have actually been the source of my SQ issues currently. While I had some background noise before, I have a much louder noise floor now (also have more power) but more importantly, the Mid to treble range just does not sound anywhere as clear as it used to. Vocals aren't pristine anymore and other music doesn't 'surround' me as it used to. (Not a fan of electronica but it sounds GREAT in a fully working MS-8 system). There are other possibilities of course:
Im sort of convinced I should have left it in the stereo/speaker level in configuration...but maybe I am out to lunch? Thoughts? |
01-27-2014, 04:03 PM | #2 |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
I suspected this since I switched out my headunit, but there are too many variables for me to say for sure.
If I had USB with the stock headunit it would have been a fairer comparison. Also I removed the ms8 when I switched out the headunit. I had my rear speakers and center powered by the ms8, the front speakers and underseats were powered by the xd600/6. After changing the headunit I just have my front door speakers and underseats powered by the xd600/6 and all other speakers are disconnected. Here are a few things you can try: 1. Replace the headunit. You'll get alot more features anyways and you can use any amp or sound processor without having to worry about balanced inputs. 2. Get a more powerful amp. When all 6 channels on my amp were working I had my Morels bridged and the sq was much better with 150 watts than with 75 watts. I realized that headroom is one of the most important things in sq. My reasoning for this is if you have more power than your speakers can handle they will blow before the amp starts to clip. It will get much louder than you can tolerate anyways so you'll never turn it up to the point that you blow your speakers. I still haven't replaced my amp yet, but I am planning on getting a PDX F6, possibly 2. I like that it does the same power at 4 ohms as it does at 2 ohms. 3. Get rid of the ms8. Even using the aux in on the ms8, sq wasn't very good and midbass was always an issue for me. I think the ms8 is part of the problem. The ms8 has 2.8 volt outputs and a good aftermarket headunit should have at least 4 volt outputs so that might be the reason for the difference in sq. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 05:11 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
394
Rep 3,161
Posts |
I switched from the DA1 / DA2 and tried the hi-fi output and switched back to the DA1 / DA2.
__________________
2015 M3 BPM Tuned, Eibach, Magnaflow and more www.tmrmzine.com/m3/f80
SOLD E92 Slēk Carbon Fiber Widebody M3 www.tmrmzine.com/m3/slek/ SOLD E92 335i Stage 3+ with all the toys www.tmrmzine.com/335/ SOLD E39 M5 Modded, What a great car! www.tmrmzine.com/m5/ |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 06:46 PM | #4 |
Colonel
147
Rep 2,383
Posts |
Well this thread prompted me try my bypass for my Iphone to compare it to the quality of my Y-cable setup.
My e90 came with the basic stereo system for the US, I removed the wires carrying the Head Unit rear channel balanced signals (no gongs or cell phone audio) from the connector going into the stock rear amp. I adapted them with some Kicker KISL wire-to-RCA adapters (because audiocontrol seems to think that balanced signals are normally transmitted through RCA cables and not twisted-pair) and added a five-foot RCA cable extension plugging into my Audiocontrol Matrix line driver's inputs. I set the inner pins for "balanced" inputs. The four outputs for FR, FL, RR, RL of the Matrix go to my 4 Channel amp and the outputs on that amp go to my subamp. That's my basic setup. So now I spliced into two cables going into my Matrix with two Y-cables. I connected one side to the same Head Unit rear channel line outs that were hooked up before, and hooked up the other side to and adapter for my Iphone's headset output (I did have to turn up the amplification on the Matrix because the Iphone doesnt output much power). Results: There does seem to be a quality difference, with the stock HU signal being much more "boomy" and stronger at the lower frequencies. Now there may be something going on in my line driver that is causing the problem. Or my wiring may be messing up the balanced signal so the Matrix is not recompiling it properly. I need to experiment more, the first thing I will do is to change the pins in my matrix to unbalanced, then take the matrix out totally (though my amps dont say they can interpret balanced signals).
__________________
Speakers: CDT Audio HD-42 comps--front doors (RAAMmat deadened), CDT ES-06 6.5" woofers--kickpanl Pods, Hertz EBX202R dual 8" ported trunk sub. Amps: Phoenix Gold RSd 500.4 (comps & pods). PG RSd 600.1 (sub). Power & Ground: 4AWG Streetwires w/RockFosgt RFDB1 distro blocks. Input: HU lineout--Kicker KISL RCA adapters--RockFosgt RFIT-6 cables--Audiocontrol Matrix--Monster cables--RSd 500.4--lineout Monstr Cabl to RSd 600.1.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 09:37 PM | #5 | |
Brigadier General
281
Rep 4,121
Posts |
Quote:
By the same token the MS-8 has served me well; a PITA to tune, no doubt, but I have had amazing results with the MS-8 and lesser equipment. I don't have mid bass issues but I know how to tune this thing better than most (and I don't always have luck on first attempt). Hence the reason I am suspecting the output configuration. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 09:59 PM | #6 | |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2014, 10:22 PM | #7 | ||
Brigadier General
281
Rep 4,121
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 11:53 AM | #8 |
Colonel
255
Rep 2,547
Posts |
I agree - and don't have measurements to back it up, but our hifi systems just don't have that nice clarity that you hear with other good car stereo systems. Maybe it is the hifi signal and maybe it's bad cabin acoustics, who knows.
I can't do anything about the cabin acoustics so am looking to install an alpine pxa-h800 in the chain. Figure break down the hifi analog to digital then have a good DAC convert it back to analog to feed my amps and morels, that should improve it, plus gain all the equalization and time delay capabilities... that's my plan anyway. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 12:15 PM | #9 | |
Brigadier General
281
Rep 4,121
Posts |
Quote:
Time alignment is working just fine in my car, I have good imaging. Its audible distortion in the audio. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 12:45 PM | #10 |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
I still think replacing the head unit is the answer. As long as you relocate the head unit to the trunk and use the connects2 harness everything will work as it should, even the steering wheel controls. Plus you could get navigation and a rear view camera which are very useful.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 01:36 PM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
281
Rep 4,121
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 05:27 PM | #13 | |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
Quote:
Chimes and pdc are the only problem on amplified systems. You'd have to have a seperate non-amplified speaker just for the chimes, I guess you could always use the center channel for that. Early e9Xs already have a seperate speaker for the chimes, so I'm not sure if its possible to retrofit one. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 05:32 PM | #14 |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
If its done right you'll get no errors, and the dealer will still be able to connect to the car. I still haven't relocated mine and I don't have any problems. Then again I've never taken my car to a BMW dealership and I didn't have any options that use most other than logic 7.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 06:46 PM | #15 | |
Colonel
255
Rep 2,547
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 08:36 PM | #16 | |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=319976 Use the Connects2 harness instead of the Metra 70-9003. Extend pins 9, 11, and 15 from the Connects2 harness to the metra harness. Ground the stock head unit to the factory grounding point in the trunk. Use the most cables from the factory Bluetooth, or satellite radio. You still need the most loop even if you don't have logic 7. If your still using the stock amp get RCA to speaker wire adapters like the thread below, or replace the amp and use a normal RCA cable. http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=809490 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 09:06 PM | #17 |
Colonel
255
Rep 2,547
Posts |
Thanks but I am still missing something here. If I connect to the harness in the dash to run the wires to the harness and radio in the trunk, what harness in the dash will I connect the new radio to? Thanks and apologize for not getting it, but I have a feeling am not the only one.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-28-2014, 10:35 PM | #18 | |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-29-2014, 05:13 AM | #19 |
Colonel
255
Rep 2,547
Posts |
Ok so in terms of harnesses, I need the metra 71-9003 and a metra 70-9003 (or connects2 equiv) and a connects2 harness (for new radio), for a total of 3?
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-29-2014, 09:20 AM | #20 |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
You only need two harnesses. One plugs into the stock connection in the dash(connects2), and the other plugs into the stock head unit.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-29-2014, 11:49 AM | #21 |
Captain
69
Rep 994
Posts |
I think he is confused because once you extend the factory dash harness, you no longer have a harness to connect the aftermarket harness to. Correct me if that is wrong.
What you do once you have that harness in the dash connected for the extension to the trunk is splice into the harness to get power and ground and all that for the aftermarket deck. That's why the splicing and heat shrinking was mentioned.
__________________
iPhone 6 Plus (iTunes library/iTunes radio/Waze, etc) to Airport Express via AirPlay. Toslink out of Airport Express to Helix P-Six DSP. PHD AF 1.C tweeters, PHD FB 4.1 midranges. Jehnert Door Cards and mid-bass'.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-29-2014, 01:25 PM | #22 | |
Major General
223
Rep 5,120
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|