|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Rear ended by a pothead tonight. Thanks, state of Washington!
|
|
12-11-2012, 02:17 PM | #23 | |
Captain
26
Rep 741
Posts |
Quote:
Sorry, couldn't resist.
__________________
Jet black e92 6mt 335xi:
18" BBS RGRs, KW v1, ESS Stage 2 flash, VRSF 7" FMIC, VRSF downpipes, JG Mods m-tech front, mtec V3 AEs, BMS OCC, hardwired valentine 1, p3cars gauge, amber delete, sport seats, factory oil cooler. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 02:18 PM | #24 | |
Captain
26
Rep 741
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Jet black e92 6mt 335xi:
18" BBS RGRs, KW v1, ESS Stage 2 flash, VRSF 7" FMIC, VRSF downpipes, JG Mods m-tech front, mtec V3 AEs, BMS OCC, hardwired valentine 1, p3cars gauge, amber delete, sport seats, factory oil cooler. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 02:20 PM | #25 |
E9X > Everything
60
Rep 742
Posts |
Man do people really think it's OK to drive high now that pot is legal? It's the same as driving drunk. Booze is legal too, but that doesn't mean you can drive after drinking it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 02:42 PM | #26 |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 447
Posts |
x 24/7/365
__________________
2008 Bsm E92 335i - FBO -E85--------Sold
2014 BSM 335i Msport - Stock |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 03:18 PM | #28 |
Colonel
99
Rep 2,323
Posts |
If you are so sure he was driving under the influence, why didnt you have him arrested? By letting him go, he might get into another accident and hurt somebody. So you are as guilty as he is for letting him go, or maybe you were just making a generalization that he was high and you really are not sure rather he was or not.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 03:24 PM | #29 |
Private
2
Rep 58
Posts |
I am from Washington also. There are specific rules in the law for DUI of pot. It's very very small. Something like .01 micrograms or something. Essentially if you smoke and drive you are DUI as I understand the law. It's akin or more stringent than alcohol. What we don't yet understand is the limit at which you are impaired under pot as no significant studies have yet to be done, so the DUI limit will be tested in court.
Now the rub.... It's a blood test and can't be done on site. But if they are DUI on pot they are clearly liable. We shall see how this all works out in the state and for me the jury is still out but its the law for now. So I will be a more vigilant driver going forward. Ok all done. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 03:42 PM | #30 | |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 447
Posts |
Quote:
I personally believe unless its stupidly obvious that your hot boxing, stoned, and reeking of weed, that you could easily avoid this situation
__________________
2008 Bsm E92 335i - FBO -E85--------Sold
2014 BSM 335i Msport - Stock |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 04:51 PM | #31 | |
Just a regular guy.
60
Rep 514
Posts |
Quote:
Furthermore, don't talk s*it when you weren't the one there. Did I disclose every single detail with you? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 04:55 PM | #32 |
Major
345
Rep 1,014
Posts |
Not to in any way condone impaired driving, but using measured concentrations of chemicals as a correlation to driving competence is quite an imperfect system . Still, I understand why they do it, and try to obey the law (that one anyway :-).
That said, I have little doubt that most of the truly scary drivers I see in my day to day commuting are probably neither drunk nor stoned. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2012, 05:33 PM | #34 |
Major General
81
Rep 6,092
Posts |
thread backfire.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|