[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by 5soko335i

WOW great numbers and times! and on RFT's! awesome.
yea i bet that intercooler helped, not sure if stock exhaust system are making big power, can also cancel out catch can and oil cooler(but this can act like a intercooler for a run or two i guess maybe 5WHP more consistent with oil temps staying cooler)

agree with you. the oil cooler I guess really made the numbers be more consistent but I dont think there was any power gains from the oil cooler, and obviously not from the catch can lol

[Driver72]

Originally Posted by Stock 335i

Great numbers! It looks like if you used a higher reading dyno (as others have), you would have been around 375rwhp - 385rwhp. All that without catless DPs is amazing!

Congrats

And if he would of used a really high reading dyno he might of gotten 485 rwhp and 510 rwtq.
But guess what, his car would still be making the same power as it did with the 360 rwhp and 355 rwtq rating he got on his dyno.
Isn't that amazing.


But as Hotrod said, the ratings are all relative to each dyno.
Who gives a rats-ass what the numbers say when compared to other dynos, it's the GAIN you got that matters.

As for the track numbers, nice work man.
high 1.8's 60' time on stock runflats means that track is VERY grippy and with 114.8 mph trap speeds, means it's a nice fast track too.

Which track and what was the DA? I'm guessing below sea level.
6AT car or 6MT?

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by GeorgiaTech335coupe

Great times! What was the temp outside when you were doing your passes? You guys must have some great track prep to do a 1.8 60' on the RFTs in what I'm sure was some cold weather up north.

I posted the weather conditions in my original post for yesterdays dyno and the stock run dyno which was 7 months ago. To be honest with you everybody that day at the track were shocked of how well the cars were gripping, I was there 2 weeks ago and could not get a 60ft time better than 2.1

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by GGreek5

Yo!! Nice runs. What day where you up there?? Congrats man. Only 2 more track days left!!!

wats up bro! i was there on friday, it was a last mins decision to go, I was up in NH to visist a friend whos in hospital so later at night i just decided to go and get a few runs. I'm thinking of going again tomorrow, do you wanna go? i might not run my car but I'll join you if you're going

[Driver72]

Originally Posted by BuLoOoSki

I posted the weather conditions in my original post for yesterdays dyno and the stock run dyno which was 7 months ago. To be honest with you everybody that day at the track were shocked of how well the cars were gripping, I was there 2 weeks ago and could not get a 60ft time better than 2.1

They probably prepped the track well before you guys ran and put a lot of IIRC it's called VHT at the launch point.
It's like glue at allows great launches.
When you went 2 weeks ago and couldn't get better than 2.1 60' time, the track was clearly not prepped too well.

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by Driver72

And if he would of used a really high reading dyno he might of gotten 485 rwhp and 510 rwtq.
But guess what, his car would still be making the same power as it did with the 360 rwhp and 355 rwtq rating he got on his dyno.
Isn't that amazing.


But as Hotrod said, the ratings are all relative to each dyno.
Who gives a rats-ass what the numbers say when compared to other dynos, it's the GAIN you got that matters.

As for the track numbers, nice work man.
high 1.8's 60' time on stock runflats means that track is VERY grippy and with 114.8 mph trap speeds, means it's a nice fast track too.

Which track and what was the DA? I'm guessing below sea level.
6AT car or 6MT?

I agree with you but I just thought I'd dyno the car at ICS for the sake of seeing how it compares with the rest. That day i was really shocked on how well the track was gripping, most of the times when I go I cant stop spinning my tires in first. But last friday, everyone seemed to get good traction. I saw a f*cking street legal cobra that lifted its tires of the ground by ~5inches that day!!!!

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by Driver72

They probably prepped the track well before you guys ran and put a lot of IIRC it's called VHT at the launch point.
It's like glue at allows great launches.
When you went 2 weeks ago and couldn't get better than 2.1 60' time, the track was clearly not prepped too well.

yeah i guess that makes sense

[BuLoOoSki]

forgot to answere your question, the car is an auto and the track is just slightly above sea level, 80ft i think?? I'll calculate the DA and post it up later on

[Driver72]

Originally Posted by BuLoOoSki

forgot to answere your question, the car is an auto and the track is just slightly above sea level, 80ft i think?? I'll calculate the DA and post it up later on

Nice, I can tell you right now if the track is only 80 feet above sea level, if temps were below 75 degrees that night, you had well below sea level DA's I'm sure.
Makes for some really fast times, combined with the fact they obviously prepped the launch pad well that day.
Good times for you guys.
Us west coast guys are jealous, we have no track options like that anywhere close to us.

[BuLoOoSki]

isnt Fomoso raceway supposed to be well prepped? i mean the fastest 335i got its time there

[GAaaAR]

Great Run! Was traction disabled? Did the Tire slippage from JB3 1.1 cause you to feather the throttle at all? Or you pretty much had the foot on the pedal after launching? Also, is the tune pre or post 29.2?

[OpenFlash]

Originally Posted by BuLoOoSki

isnt Fomoso raceway supposed to be well prepped? i mean the fastest 335i got its time there

quickest, not fastest

Shiv
116.8mph

[OpenFlash]

btw, great run. At Sacramento, I can't come close to those 60' times on drag radials!

[Sniz]

great runs, always nice to run at a good track! I'm heading to MIR in a few weeks and hope to have similar conditions.

wish I had an auto for just that day.....

[GeorgiaTech335coupe]

Originally Posted by BuLoOoSki

I posted the weather conditions in my original post for yesterdays dyno and the stock run dyno which was 7 months ago. To be honest with you everybody that day at the track were shocked of how well the cars were gripping, I was there 2 weeks ago and could not get a 60ft time better than 2.1

I meant the weather conditions while you were doing your passes at the track.

[Craig@SupremePower]

Nice numbers man!!

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by GAaaAR

Great Run! Was traction disabled? Did the Tire slippage from JB3 1.1 cause you to feather the throttle at all? Or you pretty much had the foot on the pedal after launching? Also, is the tune pre or post 29.2?

yes traction was fully off, the tire spun a bit at the launch but my foot was on the floor, i didnt feather it at all. I have the pre-29.2 tune

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

quickest, not fastest

Shiv
116.8mph

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

btw, great run. At Sacramento, I can't come close to those 60' times on drag radials!

thanks shiv, its true you hold the highest trap speed but if you had a 1.6 60ft time instead of the 2.0 wouldnt your trap speed have dropped to 114 as well? Because I think the better 60ft you have, you will sacrifice some of the trap speed, right?

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by Sniz

great runs, always nice to run at a good track! I'm heading to MIR in a few weeks and hope to have similar conditions.

wish I had an auto for just that day.....

goodluck man

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by GeorgiaTech335coupe

I meant the weather conditions while you were doing your passes at the track.

I think it was around 50F and 65% humidity. The track is about 80ft above sea level i believe bit I'm not sure about that.

[BuLoOoSki]

Originally Posted by Craig@SupremePower

Nice numbers man!!

thanks man

[OpenFlash]

Originally Posted by BuLoOoSki

thanks shiv, its true you hold the highest trap speed but if you had a 1.6 60ft time instead of the 2.0 wouldnt your trap speed have dropped to 114 as well? Because I think the better 60ft you have, you will sacrifice some of the trap speed, right?

My trap speeds remained constant between 1.85 and 2.3 60' times And they actually went UP when I put on drag radials. I think with 6MTs, there is enough potential for driver error that the earlier you can hook up, the more track you have available for acceleration. Especially for drag racing n00bs like me.

Shiv