|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Potenza RE050A RFT vs Potenza RE050A I RFT
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-16-2010, 03:46 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
125
Rep 1,546
Posts |
Potenza RE050A RFT vs Potenza RE050A I RFT
So my 2007 E92 335i sport came with Potenza RE050A RFT tires and the ride is really ruff and i gets bubbles on the front tires all the time.
My 2010 E90 LCI 335i m-sport came with Potenza RE050A I RFT. What does the I stand for? The E90 seems to ride a bit smoother aswell. |
03-16-2010, 03:53 PM | #2 |
Major
138
Rep 1,424
Posts
Drives: '23 i4 M50, '15 M3, '18 911
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, California, USA
|
I know there was supposed to be an improved "2.0" version of the RE050A tire coming out. Read about it last November. Maybe it's the improved version of the tire. Why Bridgestone gave the "improved" tire the same model name, I'm not sure.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2010, 09:36 PM | #5 |
Major General
122
Rep 6,594
Posts |
Pretty sure these are not the "3G" RE050A's that Japan already has. Tirerack already has Potenza RE050A I and Potenza RE050A II in stock, both of which have been available for a while.
__________________
X7 LCI // Incoming C7 ZR1 ZTK // Sebring + TRX // Hydro + Raptor Gen1 Roush // Tuxedo Last edited by jopa489; 03-16-2010 at 09:50 PM.. Reason: Typo |
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2010, 09:46 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant Colonel
22
Rep 1,938
Posts |
I've wondered about Bridgestone tires, since I have to put new rubber on my 330xi, and Bridgestone was one of the candidates. My other car is a 335i, MY2009, and came with Bridgestones RE050A I RFT, which conforms to the excellent table SCA posted. I thought RE050A was the first and R050A I the second generation RFT. A third generation Bridgestone has been announced and received the usual accolades, but is not available anywhere I know for purchase. Also, the designation of the tire AFAIK has not been published (RE050A II ?).
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 03:38 AM | #8 |
Private
18
Rep 71
Posts |
there is a new generation mf potenza rft coming...i have a document but it is in german...
they promise improvment... |
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 05:10 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
87
Rep 1,555
Posts |
I noticed a second option for tires at tire rack also a few weeks ago. I also read in Roundel that Bridgestone was developing a newer version of the RFT that has similar charcteristics of a regular tire. Hard to understand because they feel like lead weights!
Thats all I have heard...if the second generation is out...the marketing department has been quiet. This thread would probably get more results over in the wheel & tire section.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 05:56 AM | #10 |
Brigadier General
313
Rep 3,262
Posts |
I have Bridgestone RE050A II. I like them, to be honest. I have 20.000 miles on them and they still have tread. They are pretty soft over bumps, but I read the Michelin PS2 RFT are softer (but wear faster).
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 06:36 AM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
565
Rep 3,742
Posts |
Quote:
One thing I have noticed is the sidewall is significantly thicker (wider) on the PS2 RFT vs. the RE050A RFT. I still have my factory Bridgestones while a family member has had the PS2s for over a year. BTW, the ride with the PS2s is dramatically improved. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 07:35 AM | #12 |
Major
475
Rep 1,191
Posts
Drives: 2009 BMW 328i Wagon
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
|
I had a set of the RE050 II's also. They weren't as bad as people said, but non-runflats definitly ride better, handle just as good, and cost way less. I am rolling on 17's though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 08:32 AM | #13 |
Speed Demon
205
Rep 3,690
Posts |
About 7500 on mine, with 90% tread (PS2 ZPs). I'd say mine are probably going to last longer than yours. :P
__________________
Current: '21 M5C, '15 X6 50i Previous: '18 M550i, '16 550i, '11 335is, '09 E93 M3 DCT, '10 E90 335d, '07 E90 328i |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 12:51 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant Colonel
125
Rep 1,546
Posts |
The RE050A I ride alot better than the Regular RE050A... i have two cars with both tires on them so i knpow exactly how they feel, and the 'I' tire is ALOTT softer over bumps and rides better... so i would def go for the 'I' if that is the new generation, its 100x better than the regular ones IMHO.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2010, 08:11 AM | #15 | |
Major
62
Rep 1,452
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-07-2012, 12:25 PM | #17 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
200
Rep 1,834
Posts
Drives: '05 E90 330i Manual
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Quote:
Spoke to a technical person at Bridgestone and he seemed to insist that there is no problem mixing these tyres, however since the construction is slightly difference (plus now I see that there are differences in tread depth, width and even diameter), so it will be a problem on the same axle - might cause a certain degree of tyre pull. But same pairs on the same axle should be fine, I would think especially when you have narrow/wides etc. But, I still am concerned that Tirerack makes a point to say that Bridgestone suggests that you may not mix them... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|