|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
mpg difference from 18" to 19" wheels
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-02-2008, 04:37 PM | #1 |
Colonel
296
Rep 2,687
Posts |
mpg difference from 18" to 19" wheels
anyone jump from 18 to 19 and notice a difference in mpg. I'm getting about 15.5 mpg with the 19's while i had about 18mpg when i had my 18's.
__________________
POSTED WITH APOLOGIES FOR POOR SPELLING, GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE STRUCTURE |
04-02-2008, 04:39 PM | #2 |
Major General
160
Rep 5,271
Posts |
19's = 20.9 mpg
20's= 19.1 mpg
__________________
2006 330i | Black Sapphire Metallic | Step Auto | Navi with iDr | Sports Pkg |OEM Rear Spoiler | 3M CS35 Tint | H&R Sport Springs | Koni Yellows | Advan RS Racing Hypersilver: 19x9 et22 19x10 et20
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:00 PM | #3 |
Colonel
296
Rep 2,687
Posts |
what psi you running? i have no highway driving either.
__________________
POSTED WITH APOLOGIES FOR POOR SPELLING, GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE STRUCTURE |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:04 PM | #4 |
chris
278
Rep 12,144
Posts |
bigger wheels with more weight would make the mpg suffer
__________________
Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW 2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone) |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:08 PM | #5 |
Major General
335
Rep 7,719
Posts |
I didn't noticed much of a difference when I went from 18s to 19s. Maybe 1 MPG different at max, but a number of factor can be associated to that.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:09 PM | #6 |
256
Rep 4,048
Posts |
There isn't much MPG difference at all... If you really look into it, it might be 1 mpg at the highest. I really doubt it would be higher than that. Haven't done the research myself so I can't be 100% but it cannot be too high...
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:10 PM | #7 | |
Colonel
343
Rep 2,118
Posts |
Quote:
OP, did the diameter of your wheel tire combination change? If so maybe that's throwing off the car's calculation. Thanks, Mike. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:17 PM | #8 | |
Brigadier General
434
Rep 4,380
Posts
Drives: 2014 Audi A4 / 91 Track Miata
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
If they are accompanied by wider tires...more rolling resistance...or if the wheels are heavier...you will have slightly less mileage on a bigger wheel/tire package
__________________
Car is now gone .... :-( |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 05:17 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
98
Rep 3,618
Posts |
Some wheels are pretty damn heavy, Tire Rack has 19" wheels starting from 20.5lb to the low 30s. To the OP, I'm assuming your 18s are oem while the 19s are aftermarket? Either way, what exactly are they? Also Michael has a very good point, did you buy tires with the proper rolling diameter?
__________________
2016 Mercedes-AMG CLA45
2013 Mercedes-Benz B250 - Gone 2010 Mercedes-Benz C350 4Matic - Gone 2006 BMW 330xi - Gone 2001 Infiniti QX4 - Gone |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 06:58 PM | #10 | |
Colonel
296
Rep 2,687
Posts |
Quote:
now i'm runing 19 lm reps. 8.5 in front, 9.5 in rear. what psi is everyone running.. i'm only running 38.
__________________
POSTED WITH APOLOGIES FOR POOR SPELLING, GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE STRUCTURE |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 07:11 PM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
98
Rep 3,618
Posts |
Quote:
You might want to open your driver's door and check what the sticker on the lower B-pillar says, there should be a chart breaking down tire combinations and the appropriate pressure, my E90 330xi for example recommends 32 front, 35 rear if I'm not mistaken.
__________________
2016 Mercedes-AMG CLA45
2013 Mercedes-Benz B250 - Gone 2010 Mercedes-Benz C350 4Matic - Gone 2006 BMW 330xi - Gone 2001 Infiniti QX4 - Gone |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 07:32 PM | #12 | |
Colonel
296
Rep 2,687
Posts |
Quote:
I jsut did 40psi all around. Going to see if there's any difference.
__________________
POSTED WITH APOLOGIES FOR POOR SPELLING, GRAMMAR AND SENTENCE STRUCTURE |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2008, 07:42 PM | #13 |
Brigadier General
98
Rep 3,618
Posts |
You really should check either the manual or your pillar sticker to see what is recommended. 40 is awfully high as a cold pressure, would go up to around 43 when warmed up. Also some tires naturally look partially deflated, it's the softer sidewalls.
__________________
2016 Mercedes-AMG CLA45
2013 Mercedes-Benz B250 - Gone 2010 Mercedes-Benz C350 4Matic - Gone 2006 BMW 330xi - Gone 2001 Infiniti QX4 - Gone |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2008, 02:14 AM | #14 | |
Captain
83
Rep 634
Posts |
Quote:
This past September took a stunt driving course, and learned a LOT about tires. Those stickers on the doors with "recommended psi” are bullshit. (They’re more of a compromise between, performance, safety, and COMFORT.) We were taught to inflate our tires 5psi above the maximum psi on the sidewall of the tire. (Where it says…”do not inflate past ## psi”, so that +5.) It sounds crazy, I know but it’s actually the best thing for you and your tires. (And not just for “stunt driving”, it’s actually better for daily driving, and bad weather.) The only thing is that you have to inflate your tires to this +5psi when they’re newer, b/c doing it to old/damaged/worn out tires will just put stress on whatever damage they already have. Basically… higher PSI = 1. Stronger Sidewall, 2. Better contact patch on wet roads, and 3. longer tread life. (The only downside is that the ride comfort will suffer a little.) I could go on but I’ve said enough. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2008, 01:41 PM | #15 |
Major General
143
Rep 6,333
Posts |
ya I do my tire pressure above recommended level also. 38/40
and back to the topic, my mpg did suffer. i went from a 320mi full tank to a 300mi full tank. acceleration is worsen also as higher rpm is needed to reach the same speed in the same time frame. but i personally think the looks is worth the performance/efficiency downgrade.
__________________
2017 BMW M4 DCT Lease Transfer: https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...8#post23736398
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2008, 02:49 PM | #16 |
Private First Class
3
Rep 152
Posts |
Are there any other threads which compare the MPG for wheel sizes/types? I upgraded from OEM 156's (16") to OEM 162's (18") and my MPG is suffering greatly, as is my free-wheel roll (going downhill in neutral). Thanks!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|