|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
3 Series is a common car!
|
|
02-15-2011, 08:41 AM | #68 |
Second Lieutenant
6
Rep 254
Posts |
Ok then snobbery was a misleading term there, perhaps I should have said attitude to lesser spec owners on here. It was just how I saw the thread going in general terms at the time I posted last night. Fair enough smell the sh!t you shovel as they say but I am not going to be pigeon-holed for diluting the brand cause I went for a 320d.
For what it is worth I don't think it is that common a car anyhow, yesterday I did my usual drive via a major trunk road between Wolverhampton and Brum then onto the M5 for about 6 junctions or so. Did not see another E90 going or coming back, however I did see an E91 and 2 E92s. Common as muck those coupes...... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 08:49 AM | #69 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Errrmmmm...
Sales of the E90 have been very strong. In 2007, a record total of more than 58,000 vehicles were sold and it was the seventh most popular car in Britain... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 09:48 AM | #71 |
Colonel
62
Rep 2,472
Posts |
316s, 318s and 320s don't dilute the brand. If it wasn't for the creation and subsequent large number of sales of these smaller engined models there would be no brand left. So next time you blast past a poor little 318 in your 335, doth your cap in thanks as it would never have existed without it.
It's normal for people in the more powerful cars within a range to look down on their smaller engined brothers. I previously always bought hot hatches and looked down on the less powerful models. However, I owned a 318d and to most of my friends who have no interest in cars this was far more prestigious than any of the 200+ bhp hatches that I owned even though initial cost was the same. Anyway, to get back to the original topic. Yes, there are a lot of 3s about. No bad thing. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 10:40 AM | #72 | |
Lieutenant
37
Rep 517
Posts |
Quote:
I have to except I'm under the poverty line in your eyes, you have to except it's a stuck up comment in my opinion |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 10:46 AM | #73 | |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Quote:
And "M Sport" is not a model, it's a trim spec. It's a bit like me putting "335d Panoramic Sunroof and Dakota Leather" - a bit silly really. Christ if having a 318d/320d makes one so uptight, I think I'll stick to my HUGE engined rocketship-soot-chucking-hearse that makes me do nothing but smile. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 10:49 AM | #75 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
So do I - ner ner ner ner neeerrrr.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 10:58 AM | #76 | |
First Lieutenant
18
Rep 339
Posts |
Quote:
There are times I wish I had all the MSport trim except the suspension (and non-staggered sizes when it comes to buying new tyres ) We could go the other way and just state E9x and forgo the engine sizes |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:01 AM | #77 |
Colonel
54
Rep 2,197
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:03 AM | #79 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:07 AM | #80 |
First Lieutenant
18
Rep 339
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:08 AM | #81 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
I think it still is a no cost option.
Mine is backwards - SE car with M sport suspension. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:24 AM | #82 |
First Lieutenant
18
Rep 339
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:27 AM | #83 |
Colonel
274
Rep 2,774
Posts |
I've had loads of beemers, all off which have been 6 cylinder. Would never have a 4 pot - unless that 2.0 ltr turbo coming down the line cuts the mustard. Wouldnt have poverty spec either. Hey ho, just my views.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 11:55 AM | #84 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 169
Posts |
BMWs are fine driving machines, in whatever specification or engine size
It's down to choice - there are many reasons for choosing a specific car... For example, I would have settled for a 520d without any problems, but because I did not like the oval singular exhaust pipe, I went one up - not to look down on smaller engined models, it was purely a matter of taste. In times gone by, I loved BMW but Mr. Insurance wasn't having any of it, so I had to settle for smaller engine models - again individual reasons. To describe basic models as "poverty spec" or any other similar derogatory term, is ignorant at the least. If your needs are basic, then you don't need maximum spec. Would you live alone in a 20 bedroom house? Or set the table for 4 if you eat alone? Don't be daft... As for E90 popularity ... yes, they are popular... but draw the line between popular and common - these words might imply the same thing, but in two different ways Last edited by NightVisitant; 02-15-2011 at 12:00 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 01:21 PM | #86 |
Major General
171
Rep 7,953
Posts
Drives: Merc diesel
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2010 TTRS [9.00]
2007 Audi S5 [0.00] May 2007 Porsche 99 ... [0.00] March 2007 Porsche ... [0.00] Sep. 2007 E92 335d SE [0.00] July 2006 E90 330i ... [0.00] |
You lot decided who has the biggest willie then?
Bottom line is we all drive what suits us and our budgets. How we all perceive things will always vary and not coincide with everyone elses opinions. Even down to how one person thinks wow what a great car to drive, to others who can't really see what all the fuss is about. I buy a car for me and what I like and want out a car. Fuck everybody else, it honestly doesn't matter. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 01:25 PM | #87 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2011, 01:29 PM | #88 |
Colonel
97
Rep 2,834
Posts |
Can we cut the crap and be honest for a moment?
I'd love an M5 and a Ferrari 458. I can't afford to run the former and I can't afford to buy the latter (let alone run it). In that respect my 335d is "poverty spec". I bought it because it meets certain criteria both as a car and financially. Compared to a lot of the cars that other members here drive around in 2 year old E92 is a shed. Are 318/320 drivers any different? Why did they buy their cars? Did price and long-term running costs have nothing to do with it? Can we just drop the pretence. "Poverty spec" is a turn of phrase that I used. However, I am not the only to use it and I certainly didn't invent it. Get off your moral high horses for 5 minutes and appreciate that nothing in this thread was intentionally derogatory. EDIT: We all know the only reason Matt got an SE with no iDrive because he's a poor bastard and couldn't afford and M-Sport with pro-nav despite what he says to the contrary Last edited by toxicnerve; 02-15-2011 at 01:35 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|