Login






BMW Garage  BMW Meets  Register  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read 

BMW 3Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
iCarbon N55 Downpipe Review


11182010, 12:56 PM  #46  
Second Lieutenant
12
Rep 262
Posts 
Quote:
Quote:


Appreciate
0

11182010, 01:05 PM  #47 
Resistance is futile...
31
Rep 632
Posts 
Excellent Work. Real quality! It looks trick! Now if you would only fabricate some N54 Z4 downpipes... :P
__________________
An ounce of performance is worth pounds of promises.

Appreciate
0

11182010, 08:13 PM  #48 
Lieutenant
22
Rep 534
Posts 
i want a DP but not sure if i should wait or buy now ? dammmm
__________________
USED TO HAVE A 385 whp 479 tq N55 335 2011 (AT) AND NOW A 135 M package 2010 (AT) 447whp/504tq

Appreciate
0

11182010, 08:56 PM  #49 
Lieutenant Colonel
52
Rep 1,616
Posts
Drives: '11 E92 335i
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Fl


Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:10 PM  #50  
Second Lieutenant
10
Rep 251
Posts 
Quote:
Both downpipes delete the cat, so the source of the biggest restriction is gone in both DPs. Is there something that I'm missing? 

Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:28 PM  #52  
Tuner
1046
Rep 17,612
Posts 
Quote:
As for n54 (dual) downpipes, the notion that 3" pipes will outperform 2.5"pipes is funny considering each downpipe only needs to channel half the exhaust flow. But the idea of "bigger is always better" sells to those who don't know any better. Shiv 

Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:32 PM  #53  
Banned
14
Rep 4,733
Posts 
Quote:


Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:38 PM  #54 
Tuner
1046
Rep 17,612
Posts 
Dual catless 2.5" vs. dual 3.0" ID downpipes doesn't really matter to me. Both are adequately sized to easily support 250bhp (x2). Besides, the 3.0" downpipes taper back down to 2.5" where the meet up with the midpipes. Granted, the downpipes have a pretty sharp bend. Which makes 2.5" more appealing than the 2.25" that would usually be associated with that perbank power level.

Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:43 PM  #55  
Banned
14
Rep 4,733
Posts 
Quote:


Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:44 PM  #56 
Tuner
1046
Rep 17,612
Posts 

Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:52 PM  #57  
once Treppiede
45
Rep 915
Posts 
Quote:
Someone (sorry, don't remember whom) posted this link a couple of weeks ago and I found it extremely interesting. Here's a quote: Quote:
Quote:
If I recall correctly, someone on this Forum had custom 3" midpipes done that tapered down to 2.5" at the mufflers. I suppose such setup could have easily handled over 500whp given the reduced backpressure caused by moving the taper so far down the exhaust. Walter
__________________
2013 E92 M3  6MT  AlpWhite  SilverNovillo  CarbonTrim  ZCP  PremiumPkg  Alarm
2009 E92 335i  6MT  AlpWhite  CoralRed  AlumTrim  MSport  Nav  Logic7  Alarm (sold to a friend  still in the family) 

Appreciate
0

11182010, 09:58 PM  #58  
Banned
14
Rep 4,733
Posts 
Quote:


Appreciate
0

11182010, 10:04 PM  #59  
Tuner
1046
Rep 17,612
Posts 
Quote:
But it's true that you do want to push ID transitions as far downstream as possible since that is where the exhaust is coldest and has the least velocity. But in the case of the n54's dual exhaust system where each downpipe is only flowing half of the total exhaust flow, even 2.5" is sufficient. Running dual 3" exhausts (downpipe+midpipes) wont help or hurt you anymore than running dual 5" exhausts. It's all overkill above a certain point. I think the most important point that Jay made is that you want to make the transition between the turbine output and the downpipe inlet as smooth as possible and then gradually flare it out from there. This would suggest that the idea exhaust system would start off at ~2.25" coming off the turbo, flaring out to 2.5" (or 3") and staying that diameter all the way to the dual tips. Shiv 

Appreciate
0

11182010, 10:06 PM  #60 
Resistance is futile...
31
Rep 632
Posts 
Spot on
__________________
An ounce of performance is worth pounds of promises.

Appreciate
0

11182010, 10:53 PM  #61  
once Treppiede
45
Rep 915
Posts 
Quote:
Based on the transition smoothness part, I imagine that in our case slight (perhaps irrelevant) turbulence might be created with DPs with collectors larger than ~2.25". Thanks for the follow up Shiv. Walter
__________________
2013 E92 M3  6MT  AlpWhite  SilverNovillo  CarbonTrim  ZCP  PremiumPkg  Alarm
2009 E92 335i  6MT  AlpWhite  CoralRed  AlumTrim  MSport  Nav  Logic7  Alarm (sold to a friend  still in the family) 

Appreciate
0

11182010, 10:58 PM  #62  
Tuner
1046
Rep 17,612
Posts 
Quote:


Appreciate
0

11192010, 12:49 AM  #63 
General
1914
Rep 32,488
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com

If any of you is counting your pounds, this DP will save you about 5 pounds off the front of your 135/335i

Appreciate
0

11192010, 03:05 AM  #65  
General
1914
Rep 32,488
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com

Quote:
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=455010 

Appreciate
0

11192010, 03:19 AM  #66  
283
Rep 15,733
Posts 
Quote:
And why did mr. 5 gain hp using 3" dps over 2.5s? I'm not trying to hijack anything, I deal with HP Autowerks all the time and Harold is one of the best people I've ever had the pleasure of talking to and doing business with. I can't knock the fitment of it or the gains of it (18hp is nice), the only thing I'm criticizing is the use of an oem size flange which from the factory is a bottleneck to begin with. And 360/370 hp is it? Are you so sure about that? 3 years ago you said you were uncertain if we could break 400hp in an N54, and look where we are at now. Last edited by itsbrokeagain; 11192010 at 03:49 AM. 

Appreciate
0

Bookmarks 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 

