|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Dinan ECU Flash Software vs PROcede v2.02 Dyno
|
|
12-21-2007, 04:50 PM | #23 |
Moderator
618
Rep 10,855
Posts |
Wow, if the Dinan is within 5% of the power of the PROcede v2 @94% on 94 Oct that is veeerrry impressive. Surely you guys pulled a bit on the expressway next to each other? Great job doing all this!
Edit: The numbers must be low, given Shiv's stat of 7% difference for whp. I guess that would be ~ 3% torque.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 Last edited by stressdoc; 12-21-2007 at 10:31 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 04:53 PM | #24 | |
Brigadier General
670
Rep 4,959
Posts |
Interesting information.
Hey shiv, The Dinan flash is actually pretty impressive for $2,000 and a warranty, don't you think? Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 04:56 PM | #25 |
Moderator
618
Rep 10,855
Posts |
To be honest, going from the 325 crank hp stock map to 385 is at the boundary of what I heard BMW R&D was evaluating before they released the 335. That is probably the limit of what BMW was willing to OK. It sounds like a great tune so far.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:12 PM | #28 |
Captain
21
Rep 703
Posts
Drives: '11 550i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
Just for fun I entered all the data PROVIDED BY DINAN into a spreadsheet and applied driveline loss factors to produce RW Torque. Let's see if ORB's dyno looks anything like the data DINAN provided.
*NOTE - Dinan FLASHED numbers are on a car that also is running the Dinan exhaust (claimed +10HP at RW's) *Run on 93 Octane* |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:15 PM | #29 |
Lieutenant Colonel
562
Rep 1,723
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:15 PM | #30 |
First Lieutenant
41
Rep 342
Posts |
I'm impressed at the Dinan tune. What I am more interested is the partial throttle response, the torque curve at the important 1500-4000 rpm range and drivability issues. Peak numbers are nice and all but for most of us, including dinan tune purchasers, all the above are more important in daily driving.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:16 PM | #31 | |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
For $2000+install, it will appeal to those who want their local Dinan dealer to do all the work. Those who don't mind doing their own install and choose to go with v2 will end up paying a bit less and make 20-25whp more right out of the box. With the option to make 45whp more than the Dinan flash by simply adding a $250 intake upgrade. And we're not even talking about the additional features and ability to adapt to race gas (and make a lot more power) Again, we are talking about two different kinds of customers here. Some want good performance and don't mind paying premium. Others want max performance and won't feel pressured or intimidated by learning about the new feature we add along the way. I've always been the latter type. But then again, I also like adding custom ringtones to my cell phone. I'm happy with the results, obviously. But we're not going to sit still Shiv |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:19 PM | #32 | |
Major
76
Rep 1,253
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:24 PM | #33 | |
First Lieutenant
41
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:26 PM | #34 | |
First Lieutenant
21
Rep 384
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:33 PM | #36 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
111
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
BTW, the test was done with my air filter being new but stock. I do have drop in filter that I'm putting in. Badass35 19” wheels are 35% lighter than my 230 wheels. Other than this we have the same setup and close enough. Orb |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:53 PM | #37 | |
Brigadier General
670
Rep 4,959
Posts |
Shiv,
I think that everything you said is pretty accurate. Especially the fact that the products obviously appeal to two different types of customers. They are both great options. However, I think that your product has the opportunity to appeal to an even larger group of customers. It seems that a number of people do not choose the Procede because of the level of involvement (installation, removal for dealer visit, etc) it requires from the customer (and for some people, this involvement is absolutely GREAT, and they LOVE this aspect). There is nothing that can be done about this installation issue, unless you guys go nationwide on us with authorized Vishnu Tuning stores. Also, I think that a lot of people are scared away by all of the limp mode, CEL, long waiting times, etc. panic posts that pop up from time to time. While these "bugs" might be ultimately harmless, I think that those who paid $50,000 for the car, but are not "tuning gurus" but want more power think that there might be some kind of damage caused to their engine from the Procede. I think that the Procede is a phenomenal product, but it would be nice to see all of the current "bugs" (which I realize, a fair amount are the user's fault) worked out, before more time is devoted to just increasing power. While the Dinan flash is still inferior in terms power relative to the newest version of Procede, it would seem that the flash clearly has the upper hand in reliability, at this point. Although, I guess it's too early to tell. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:54 PM | #38 | |
Lieutenant
25
Rep 518
Posts |
Quote:
Congrats Orb! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:56 PM | #40 |
Captain
21
Rep 703
Posts
Drives: '11 550i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:58 PM | #41 | |
Private
2
Rep 67
Posts |
Quote:
Anyway it just depends on your preference I could see a lot of people just want to get the extra power and pay the 2K for it. I think in the end Dinan will be a lot more conservative and less flexibile than Vishnu but only time will tell. I can just see it, take your car in for an oil change, you forget to show them your Dinan paperwork and they flash your car with an update, and all of sudden your back to 8psi
__________________
335i coupe sport package Proceed V2 / KW V2.
My other car |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:59 PM | #42 | |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
To answer your question, I'm using percentage differences because that's the only way to account for differences in dyno calibration. Using absolute hp numbers is meaningless when comparing two dynos that have horses of different size and stature. Shiv |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 06:17 PM | #43 |
First Lieutenant
35
Rep 315
Posts |
I'm booking for an install in the new year. Goodbye turbo tuner!
__________________
/Steptronic/CA/Nav/AS/Prem/Sport/19s/6fl/
Mods: Magnaflow quad exhaust tips/ Painted reflectors & calipers/Hartge rep 19" winter rims/3m non metallic tint/Rieger spoiler/aero front and rear/ACS roof spoiler/corners delete/Bimmian lock covers and interiorlights/MTech fogs/GP Thunder angels/Bluetooth Parrot retrofit kit/tv&nav2go/ |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 06:53 PM | #44 | |
Brigadier General
327
Rep 4,484
Posts |
Quote:
v2.0.2 is about 10-20 rwhp more than v1.47 but v2.0.2 is about 5-8 rwtq LESS than v1.47 So the Dinan looks to have about the same rwhp as the v1.47 but with a bit less torque. For comparison, these guys were on 94 Octane in 32 degree weather and got these numbers. Two weeks ago, when I dynoed v1.47 on my auto 335i with stock air filter (no other mods except 19" wheels) I was on a lower octane (92) and it was quite a bit warmer (62 degrees) and I got: 331.8 rwhp 366.x rwtq Had I been on 94 Octane and it was 30 degrees colder, you can figure I'd of gotten at least 5 more rwhp/rwtq. The Dinan flash seems good, and as we all figured with 13.2 psi peak boost, would have power numbers pretty much right in line with v1.47 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|