[Brett]

Originally Posted by mimmitt

Are you using MB's stated times for the 550 or the real times? That CLK will be under 5 seconds to 60, just as the SL with the same engine is under 5 seconds.

It was a joke Note the disclaimer:

Sure this is not a scientific comparison, lacks revelant statistics and other very important data, ignores base differences, and is a poor generalization.

-Brett

[mimmitt]

Originally Posted by Brett

It was a joke Note the disclaimer:


-Brett

Gotcha. I bet the price difference will be even more than 15K too.

[Xphstos]

Originally Posted by morningla

just want to ask the difference between a SLK and CLK, are they just different styles? why do ppl seem to talk about the CLK more often but when I see the SLK on the road, it's much hotter.

i'm also planning on a new coupe in the future, looking into the E92, but also like the SLK styling. both quite expensive and CLK is even more right?

The SLK is only a two seater, it would be compared to the Z4, while the CLK is a four seater. Also the SLK is a hard top convertible the CLK is soft top.

[mkoesel]

Originally Posted by morningla

just want to ask the difference between a SLK and CLK, are they just different styles? why do ppl seem to talk about the CLK more often but when I see the SLK on the road, it's much hotter.

i'm also planning on a new coupe in the future, looking into the E92, but also like the SLK styling. both quite expensive and CLK is even more right?

The SLK is a small roadster along the lines of the BMW Z4. The CLK is a 4 seat coupe/convertible along the lines of the 3 series coupe and convertible. That is why it gets more discussion on this forum, because it is the closest thing Mercedes has to a E92/E93 competitor.