|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
bmw 320d, se or m sport touring?
|
|
02-09-2011, 01:32 PM | #1 |
New Member
1
Rep 7
Posts |
bmw 320d, se or m sport touring?
hello everyone, new to here so bare with me.i currently have a ford focus. thinking of getting an 08 320 d touring. Can anyone help me out weather or not to opt for the se or the m sport?? whats the main differences , and whats the rough combined mpg?
|
02-09-2011, 01:36 PM | #2 |
Major
36
Rep 1,135
Posts |
Welcome to the forum. Interesting topic to start with as it has caused a lot of debate before! M Sport basically gives you bigger wheels, body kit, sports seats, sports steering wheel and sports suspension. I have had both SE and M Sport tourings. TBH the seats are better and I like the thicker steering wheel. The grip is better on the larger wheels. Is it worth the money? Good question. The mpg is the same for both.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 01:40 PM | #3 |
New Member
1
Rep 7
Posts |
thanks Chris, what about the run flats,i live in the countryside and the potholes and the edges of the roads are not great, would there be much of a problem if i went with the m sport?
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 01:43 PM | #4 |
Major
36
Rep 1,135
Posts |
Potholes and runflats will knock your teeth out. Lot of run flat haters on here. They do make the ride firmer but the later runflats have a much better ride. I went from an SE on continental sport contact 2 runflats to Michelin Pilots PS2s on M SPort and the M Sport rides better.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 01:44 PM | #5 |
Colonel
54
Rep 2,197
Posts |
M Sport is more expensive and less comfortable. SE is cheaper and more comfortable. I had an M Sport loan car and couldn't wait to get back to my SE
M Sport has stiff suspension and low profile tyres meaning you frequently lose traction on non smooth roads. M Sport may weigh slightly more so it may actually be marginally slower. OTOH a lot of people like the M Sport look. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 01:50 PM | #7 |
Major
39
Rep 1,194
Posts |
some important things to note:
both SE and M Sport have run-flats. Ride is worse the bigger the wheels. The later the car, the better the ride - they've improved it over the years. you can add M SPort suspension and sports seats to SE. M Sport seats are very good, so if possible get SE with sport seats. M Sport isnt any heavier - cars will vary by options - but there isnt much in it. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 02:48 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant Colonel
468
Rep 1,535
Posts |
My last car was a Focus, I think it's the best in its class for ride quality. I really miss the ability to just ride over potholes.
You will find with the runflats on sport suspension that you spend a lot of time planning routes around potholes and recessed drain covers. Luckily most of my regular routes are twisty country roads with no potholes so the sport suspension really shines. The M-Sport pack does give good value if you like all the options. There's a lot of small details like the black headlining that people forget about but make such a difference to the interior. A lot of it depends on personal preference but it's definitely worth trying a car with sports seats since they are such an improvement over the standard seats. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 03:53 PM | #10 |
Major
39
Rep 1,194
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 04:20 PM | #12 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 150
Posts |
I have recently bought a 320d M Sport - the ride with run flats is truly terrible...
But I personally only like the look of the 3 series in M Sport guise - even SE with m sport alloys doesn't quite look right imo Thankfully fitting non RFT tyres does make the ride bearable - not great, not even good but definitely bearable. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 04:28 PM | #13 | |
Major
39
Rep 1,194
Posts |
Quote:
Ride was great in my 17'd car. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 05:22 PM | #17 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
I've got an SE on 17s with M sport suspension and non run flats. Seems to strike a really good ride/handling balance even if the cool kids don't like smaller wheels. Small wheels are lighter and appear to be stronger too.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 05:47 PM | #18 |
Captain
27
Rep 896
Posts |
I had an SE 163 with sports suspension and 17" (staggered) and now have a 184 M-Sport
Might not be a fair comparison, but the ride is much better in the new one, not that I found the ride harsh in the SE, just more tramlining, and "lurching" over the potholes, surface changes etc. Grip is significantly better in the new one. I've you're happy with wallowly soft suspension, go for the SE. But I would say definitely get the M-Sport. In E91, the SE looks mundane, whereas the M-Sport feels more special. Of course, people that think the M-Sport is a waste of money "just a body" etc will say otherwise, but that's why BMW do the two models - horses for courses...
__________________
Phil
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2011, 05:51 PM | #19 | |
Major
39
Rep 1,194
Posts |
Quote:
Indeed, a lot of reviews of the "ed" 3 series with it's 16's, skinnier tyres (and slightly lower ride) as being the peach of the range now from a balance/handling/ride/compliance point of view (I am of course biased I admit). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2011, 04:26 AM | #20 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Let's try and avoid opinions (some prefer the SE look, others prefer the M Sport look end of) and stick to useful facts and information.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2011, 06:35 AM | #21 |
has left the building
90
Rep 3,359
Posts |
Sounds obvious but have a good drive in both if you can. I'd read all the horror stories about run flats and M Sport suspension so I was very wary. In fact I seriously considered an SE purely on this basis. As it happened I borrowed a 320d M Sport Plus Touring on 18" run flats for the day and threw everything at it, the worst Sheffield could offer. I was pleasantly suprised and ordered at the end of the day.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|