E90Post
 


Extreme Powerhouse
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Vishnu N54 Fuel System Research Part 1



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-07-2011, 08:57 AM   #45
Rob@RBTurbo
Lieutenant Colonel
Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
United_States
387
Rep
1,571
Posts

Drives: '08 335I AT, '14 M6 DCT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO

iTrader: (5)

I posted a similar thread about this on N54tech a couple months ago, ordered all the fuel hardware and everything hoping there was a volume spec stamped on the pump (some pumps have that, this one doesnt). Having access to RC Engineering is a blessing for this venture, we are very lucky there! Not having that access, my efforts were halted as we pursue corporate questioning into spec sheets on the LPFP. So spill it, that LPFP is not anywhere near up to the task of 500hp is it...
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:00 AM   #46
pHo_e92
Captain
pHo_e92's Avatar
Canada
32
Rep
878
Posts

Drives: SGM e92
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 905

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 BMW 335i  [7.26]
2000 BMW 323i  [6.00]
1997 Honda Civic HB  [10.00]
2007 BMW X5 4.8  [10.00]
Shiv you are the BEST! Finally someone that is going to solve this mystery and get us guys some REAL results to our fuel issues.
__________________
08 335i | Space Gray | Burl Walnut Wood Trim | Sport pkg | Premium Pkg | LOGIC7 | Navi | Comfort Access

| COBB | Injen DCI | Active Autowerke | Sonic Tuning | E92 Lighting | ER | HKS | BMS | Ground Control | Vortex Tuning |
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:04 AM   #47
turbo2nr
25to4
turbo2nr's Avatar
No_Country
20
Rep
224
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nyc

iTrader: (0)

throw a bosch 044 in the lpfp area that may solve that problem..

my questions is how much can those injectors flow??

so let me get this straight the rail pressure after the hpfp is 1000-4000psi???? that seems crazy.
__________________

1996 s14 600whp
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:07 AM   #48
Rotorocious
Lieutenant Colonel
Rotorocious's Avatar
103
Rep
1,520
Posts

Drives: 335xi
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (3)

oh? you have my attention

Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:08 AM   #49
AltecBX
Colonel
AltecBX's Avatar
United_States
324
Rep
2,663
Posts

Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2018 BMW M3 ZCP  [0.00]
2007 BMW 335Xi  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo2nr View Post

so let me get this straight the rail pressure after the hpfp is 1000-4000psi???? that seems crazy.
I believe the low pressure pump sits in the tank and feeds the high pressure pump which sits right under the air box and pressurizes fuel approx 2600-3000 psi.
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps)
†Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec
AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:24 AM   #50
roninsoldier83
Second Lieutenant
roninsoldier83's Avatar
56
Rep
219
Posts

Drives: E82 128i 6MT / AP2 Honda S2000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denver, CO

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
It should help stock turbo guys as well. Part 2 coming tomorrow. I have 6hrs worth of bench testing data to compile, summarize and post. In the last two days, i've test driven 800 miles while spending an entire afternoon at RC Engineering using the equipment in their lab. It was pretty awesome
Shiv, you crafty devil you! Working behind the scenes with a major fuel injector company like RC engineering.... I think you're going to make a lot of people very happy

But dammit man, you can't do this to people!! Haha! The suspense and curiosity you've created around "Part 2" is creating far too much excitement and my lack of patience is getting the better of me

At this point, even though it's been a long time in the making apparently, this community will finally be able to move forward. This community should be thankful to have such a dedicated tuner/innovator, and if you've really found a way to add a significant amount of fuel overhead, excellent work to say the least sir!

Kudos to you sir
__________________
2008 Honda S2000 (weekend/former autoX) - 1996 Acura Integra GS-R (occasional autoX) - 2008 BMW 128i 6MT (track/time attack) - 2008 Nissan Xterra (winter beater)
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:38 AM   #51
jpsimon
Team Zissou
jpsimon's Avatar
United_States
3064
Rep
10,197
Posts

Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT

iTrader: (7)

wahoo!!
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:42 AM   #52
Brey335i
Banned
112
Rep
4,771
Posts

Drives: e46 ///M3
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (11)

So what is the motor limit then? I'm guessing 800 whp - 1200 whp. I joke I joke
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 09:57 AM   #53
secretsquirrel
Colonel
secretsquirrel's Avatar
130
Rep
2,290
Posts

Drives: f80
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Far North Dallas

iTrader: (2)

This forward thinking approach is one of the big reasons why I support Vishnu. I know that they aren't going to put out a product and just let it sit. The constant updates to an already great product and stealth mode projects always keep me entertained.
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:05 AM   #54
turbo2nr
25to4
turbo2nr's Avatar
No_Country
20
Rep
224
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nyc

iTrader: (0)

can or will the Procede be able to control (scale down/up) fuel once the hardware aspect of this is figured out,
.

i know i may be jumping the gun, but will it most likely be a upgrade for the v5? or possible a v6?

just curious, makes me more anxious to receive my V5 back from you all!
__________________

1996 s14 600whp
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:26 AM   #55
OpenFlash
United_States
1736
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Hi guys,
The stock fuel system cannot support anything close to 500hp. In fact, it starts to bump up against it's limits much earlier than I would have ever thought given all the power numbers we routinely see. And any one weak link in the system will have a negative effect on the other components. We have been seeing evidence of this for a while with respect to fuel rail pressure datalogs and random fuel system hardware failure. For some time, I've been recoding seemingly innocuous behavior that I couldn't quite explain through DME mapping alone. I think some applications just make it too easy to make power. This is one of them. And when new technology is released (BMW direct injection), the steep initial learning curve makes it too easy to just put the usual concerns on the back burner and to just make power instead. And on top of that, the fuel system design in the n54, right down to the electrical connectors, high operating pressures, EPK/HP diagnostics, closed loop pump control, mounting hardware, etc,. make "throwing in a Walbro" impossible. So a more serious effort is required. But I agree that this should't have taken 4 years to do. I'm a bit embarrassed.

Last edited by OpenFlash; 04-07-2011 at 10:42 AM..
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:31 AM   #56
dzenno
Banned
Canada
271
Rep
5,876
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Feb 2006

iTrader: (1)

Ahhh, now everyone is about to see the Unicorn I've been hinting about in the past few weeks

Great job man, can't f* wait for this!
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:40 AM   #57
prelude2perfect
Captain
prelude2perfect's Avatar
60
Rep
621
Posts

Drives: 2013 M5 and 2015 535i
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Savannah, GA

iTrader: (8)

It definitely shouldn't have taken 4 years to upgrade the fuel system. I'm just shocked that companies like RC, Precision, and Walbro haven't seen the size of this market and the profit that could be earned by giving us an upgraded fuel system. I can't believe that it's Vishnu that has to step in and find a solution. My hat off to you for taking the initiative
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:41 AM   #58
Slidewayz
Major
Slidewayz's Avatar
33
Rep
1,177
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oakland, CA

iTrader: (5)

If you have defensible IP, you should at least file a provisional utility patent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
Hi guys,
The stock fuel system cannot support anything close to 500hp. In fact, it starts to bump up against it's limits much earlier than I would have ever thought given all the power numbers we routinely see. And any one weak link in the system will have a negative effect on the other components. We have been seeing evidence of this for a while with respect to fuel rail pressure datalogs and random fuel system hardware failure. For some time, I've been recoding seemingly innocuous behavior that I couldn't quite explain through DME mapping alone. I think some applications just make it too easy to make power. This is one of them. And when new technology is released (BMW direct injection), the steep initial learning curve makes it too easy to just put the usual concerns on the back burner and to just make power instead. And on top of that, the fuel system design in the n54, right down to the electrical connectors, EPK diagnostics, closed loop pump control, mounting hardware, etc,. make "throwing in a Walbro" impossible. So a more serious effort is required. But I agree that this should't have taken 4 years to do. I'm a bit embarrassed.
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:55 AM   #59
dzenno
Banned
Canada
271
Rep
5,876
Posts

Drives:
Join Date: Feb 2006

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slidewayz View Post
If you have defensible IP, you should at least file a provisional utility patent.
+1 I would too
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 10:56 AM   #60
Joshboody
Lieutenant Colonel
65
Rep
1,708
Posts

Drives: pickemuptruck
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ

iTrader: (7)

Finally good to see this comprehensive work. There's 2 issues: supporting more fuel and reliability... hopefully both will be solved.

Go Shiv!
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 11:14 AM   #61
cstmx_ryder
Colonel
cstmx_ryder's Avatar
United_States
164
Rep
2,875
Posts

Drives: A metal box with a roundel
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland, OR

iTrader: (2)

I'm salivating at the idea.....
__________________

'08 AW E90 335i
PROcede V5 | BMS DCI | RR DPs | ETS FMIC | FORGE DVs | Stett CP | Vanguard | PSS10
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 11:14 AM   #62
Rob@RBTurbo
Lieutenant Colonel
Rob@RBTurbo's Avatar
United_States
387
Rep
1,571
Posts

Drives: '08 335I AT, '14 M6 DCT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO

iTrader: (5)

I wasn't thinking of just throwing in a Walbro, at least not without understanding the full system. In fact my thoughts were that a much bigger intank pump, fed through a much bigger FPR (that can return high fuel volumes under low loads) with a way to quiet the DME, would ultimately be the easiest solution. But if you can get it done utilizing all of the OEM hardware aside for the pump itself that would definitely be ideal in terms of ease in installation and cost. Whatever the solution, I want it.
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 11:38 AM   #63
jpsimon
Team Zissou
jpsimon's Avatar
United_States
3064
Rep
10,197
Posts

Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slidewayz View Post
If you have defensible IP, you should at least file a provisional utility patent.
Pretty sure he's got that covered, his significant other is a patent/copyright lawyer of some sort if memory serves me correctly.
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 11:49 AM   #64
alextremo
Captain
United_States
49
Rep
966
Posts

Drives: F10 550i
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimefam View Post
Excellent work! Glad to see yours is a company constantly leading the way forward! Very educational as well can't wait to see how much you've stepped up capacity. Hopefully there is an N63 variant in the near future lol.
+1
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 11:50 AM   #65
Javier
Major
Javier's Avatar
Puerto Rico
80
Rep
1,109
Posts

Drives: 335i E92
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puerto Rico

iTrader: (0)

1 for the patent
__________________
2007 328i Crimson Red *SOLD*
2010 335i MSport AW E92
Appreciate 0
      04-07-2011, 11:58 AM   #66
Jeff@TopGearSolutions
Jeff@TopGearSolutions's Avatar
United_States
3441
Rep
79,212
Posts

Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com

iTrader: (37)

Great write up and work shiv.

I had RC Injectors on my last car FTW LOL
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST