I Gave V2 what it needed and WOW

ThomasMartin · 12-13-2007, 08:26 AM

I know every countries Dyno's read differently and correct values differently but the main thing when measuring power is measuring on the same dyno and with the same conditions.

I have attached my first Dyno's that i took with V1.47 95 RON fuel no air filter, we measure in KW and NM. 290kw and 570NM. The KW Graph shows run 1 my old run with 1.47 and run 2 is V2.Today i did another dyno run and gave the V2 exactly what it needed more air "K&N Air filter" and more octane, only 102 RON fuel in tank. Max power up to 309 KW an Torque flew threw the roof at 670NM at 96% settings. These numbers are corrected for sea level.

I asked the guys not to correct but they said that they couldnt change the dyno setting as they had other cars ready to be tested.

All i have to say is wow the car neeeeeeded the air filter at this high altitude and its loving the high octane!!!!!

To SHIV " My appologies for driving you mad over having a slow car"

e.n335 · 12-13-2007, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasMartin

I know every countries Dyno's read differently and correct values differently but the main thing when measuring power is measuring on the same dyno and with the same conditions.

I have attached my first Dyno's that i took with V1.47 95 RON fuel no air filter, we measure in KW and NM. 290kw and 570NM. The KW Graph shows run 1 my old run with 1.47 and run 2 is V2.Today i did another dyno run and gave the V2 exactly what it needed more air "K&N Air filter" and more octane, only 102 RON fuel in tank. Max power up to 309 KW an Torque flew threw the roof at 670NM at 96% settings. These numbers are corrected for sea level.

I asked the guys not to correct but they said that they couldnt change the dyno setting as they had other cars ready to be tested.

All i have to say is wow the car neeeeeeded the air filter at this high altitude and its loving the high octane!!!!!

To SHIV " My appologies for driving you mad over having a slow car"

Congratulations. It seems we all should see with which intake mod Shiv comes up with. 309 KW = 415 hp and 670 NM = 495 lbft. Numbers are @ the wheels ? You had 380 hp and 420 lbft with v1.47 already. Do you have other mods ?

- Eugen

ThomasMartin · 12-13-2007, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by e.n335

Congratulations. It seems we all should see with which intake mod Shiv comes up with. 309 KW = 415 hp and 670 NM = 495 lbft. Numbers are @ the wheels ? You had 380 hp and 420 lbft with v1.47 already. Do you have other mods ?

- Eugen

wil confirm tomorrow but i doubt they are @ the wheels far to high numbers. But at the very least i know there was an increase.

With 1.47 that was the only mod now i have K&N air filter and running 102 RON octane.

Moth · 12-13-2007, 09:15 AM

Subtract 12% and his dyno will be inline with everything else we've been seeing for the last few weeks. I do wish his numbers were uncorrected though. That dyno is most likely overcorrecting his power and torque.

ThomasMartin · 12-13-2007, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moth

Subtract 12% and his dyno will be inline with everything else we've been seeing for the last few weeks. I do wish his numbers were uncorrected though. That dyno is most likely overcorrecting his power and torque.

Im going past there tomorrow ill ask if they can print me uncorrected numbers i also would like to compare to everyone else on the forum and by them correcting them you cant compare apples with peaches. But at least when i compare it to my last dyno there was a drastic increase and to me thats what matters...

e.n335 · 12-13-2007, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThomasMartin

Im going past there tomorrow ill ask if they can print me uncorrected numbers i also would like to compare to everyone else on the forum and by them correcting them you cant compare apples with peaches. But at least when i compare it to my last dyno there was a drastic increase and to me thats what matters...

The question is how much boost you are running now.

- Eugen

Lane · 12-13-2007, 10:16 AM

Looks that you were right. V1.47 had more power low down (at 2000rmp) even without the K&N and race gas. It would be interesting to see if you are able to get the same low down figures with V2 without the K&N and race fuel but by having the 100% settings instead. Or did you say before that 100% was not any better than 96%?

(P.S. The figures as such are seriously inflated as they should not be corrected, but it does not matter since we are interested in the difference)

ThomasMartin · 12-13-2007, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lane

Looks that you were right. V1.47 had more power low down (at 2000rmp) even without the K&N and race gas. It would be interesting to see if you are able to get the same low down figures with V2 without the K&N and race fuel but by having the 100% settings instead. Or did you say before that 100% was not any better than 96%?

(P.S. The figures as such are seriously inflated as they should not be corrected, but it does not matter since we are interested in the difference)

Thats what i was saying without the air filter and high octane V2 would have less power than my V1.47 "at high altitude that is" and i agree the figures should be uncorrected and ill ask them if they can print new ones tomorrow.

Being at this high altitude 96% or 100% setting made no difference on my boost as the turbos where overspinning.

dxb335d · 12-13-2007, 11:19 AM

they WHP or crank?

vbb · 12-13-2007, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dxb335d

they WHP or crank?

No way it was at the wheels. 495 wheel ft. lbs of torque? Nah.

12-13-2007, 08:26 AM	#1
ThomasMartin First Lieutenant 28 Rep 321 Posts Drives: BMW 335i Coupe Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: South Africa iTrader: (0)	I Gave V2 what it needed and WOW I know every countries Dyno's read differently and correct values differently but the main thing when measuring power is measuring on the same dyno and with the same conditions. I have attached my first Dyno's that i took with V1.47 95 RON fuel no air filter, we measure in KW and NM. 290kw and 570NM. The KW Graph shows run 1 my old run with 1.47 and run 2 is V2.Today i did another dyno run and gave the V2 exactly what it needed more air "K&N Air filter" and more octane, only 102 RON fuel in tank. Max power up to 309 KW an Torque flew threw the roof at 670NM at 96% settings. These numbers are corrected for sea level. I asked the guys not to correct but they said that they couldnt change the dyno setting as they had other cars ready to be tested. All i have to say is wow the car neeeeeeded the air filter at this high altitude and its loving the high octane!!!!! To SHIV " My appologies for driving you mad over having a slow car" Attached Images
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

12-13-2007, 09:15 AM	#4
Moth PMOTH 3 Rep 38 Posts Drives: European Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: CT iTrader: (0)	Subtract 12% and his dyno will be inline with everything else we've been seeing for the last few weeks. I do wish his numbers were uncorrected though. That dyno is most likely overcorrecting his power and torque.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-13-2007, 10:16 AM	#7
Lane Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1 12 Rep 778 Posts Drives: N54s Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: UK DE GR SW iTrader: (0)	Looks that you were right. V1.47 had more power low down (at 2000rmp) even without the K&N and race gas. It would be interesting to see if you are able to get the same low down figures with V2 without the K&N and race fuel but by having the 100% settings instead. Or did you say before that 100% was not any better than 96%? (P.S. The figures as such are seriously inflated as they should not be corrected, but it does not matter since we are interested in the difference)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

12-13-2007, 11:19 AM	#9
dxb335d The Tarmac Terrorist 951 Rep 29,345 Posts Drives: 997.2 GT3 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: ''Fandango Towers'' iTrader: (3) Garage List 2010 Porsche 997.2 GT3 [9.50] 2003 BMW E46 M3 [6.00] 2007 BMW E92 335D [5.50]	they WHP or crank? __________________ 997.2 GT3
	Appreciate 0 Quote