E90Post
 


MINHS Auto Care Center
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Just for thought: rear mounted turbo



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-10-2009, 05:02 PM   #1
GreenPlease
Lieutenant Colonel
 
GreenPlease's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW 335i e92
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orlando Florida

Posts: 1,635
iTrader: (2)

Just for thought: rear mounted turbo

Kind of like what these guys do: http://www.ststurbo.com/

I'm thinking that the best way to get a big snail on one of our cars is to

1. Keep the existing snails in place
2. Move from a 2 pipe to 1 pipe exhaust (ala AMS)
3. Ditch the rear muffler and swap in a turbocharger, something like a GT35
4. Run the new charge pipe where the old 2nd exhaust pipe would have been
5. You'd need three bypass valves: two at the exhaust manifolds and one at the intercooler.
6. Extra BOV necessary.


The reasons are fairly obvious for the BPVs and BOV. Transition from the small snails to the large snail really shouldn't be that difficult to program. Somewhere around ~4k we cut off our existing turbos via bypass valves and shut the BOV on the GT35's line.

We would keep the low end responsiveness of our existing vehicles, prolong the life of our stock turbos, and get some serious top end kick. No "lag" on the top end because the larger turbo will have already spooled from exhaust gases coming from the existing snails by the time the transition occurs. No muffler necessary because.... well three turbos should quiet things down enough.

What do you guys think?
GreenPlease is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 05:17 PM   #2
McLuVan
Lieutenant General
 
McLuVan's Avatar
 
Drives: ///M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Socal~818~

Posts: 13,120
iTrader: (1)

who will tune this?
__________________
McLuVan is offline   Vietnam
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 05:31 PM   #3
dlbrooks18
Brigadier General
 
dlbrooks18's Avatar
 
Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles

Posts: 3,565
iTrader: (2)

I like this idea, this may be our only way to get some bigger snails..

Check out this rear turbo setup on the smokinvette, it's exhaust sounds so mean, like a jet taking off with the whistle/whine + exhaust combo:

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/yt-AG2...urbo_corvette/

Edit: I think I may have posted the wrong link, but they have a black corvette rear mounted turbo setup, sounds SICK!! Saw it on Super Cars Exposed the other day on the SPEED channel

Last edited by dlbrooks18; 07-10-2009 at 05:50 PM.
dlbrooks18 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 06:35 PM   #4
ar design
 
ar design's Avatar
 
Drives: '86 325ES+S50, '01 TT QC
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver, CO

Posts: 4,408
iTrader: (9)

Garage List
Send a message via AIM to ar design Send a message via MSN to ar design Send a message via Yahoo to ar design
STS style turbos = epic fail.
ar design is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 06:46 PM   #5
brianhn1
Slow Mo
 
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US

Posts: 517
iTrader: (0)

Too much piping.
__________________
'15 M4 AW/SO, ED 7/1/14, US 8/4/14, PU 8/18/14
'13 X5 35i, '08 335i
Mopeds: '12 R1200GS, '10 F800GS, '74 R90S

brianhn1 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 06:54 PM   #6
GeorgiaTech335coupe
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Drives: Black BMW 335i coupe
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA

Posts: 1,884
iTrader: (0)

Not enough room to get piping from the rear of the car to the front. This works well in american cars as they usually have a lot of room. Unfortunately, our cars are way too jam packed to get the piping to work.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
GeorgiaTech335coupe is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 07:16 PM   #7
Chefcg1
Major
 
Chefcg1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 BMW 335i
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Airy, NC

Posts: 1,079
iTrader: (6)

not reaally a good option for small displacement and higher boost. I'm very familar with the ststurbo's coming from the GTO community. They are a very well built setup with good performance for the big V8 guys
__________________
2008 335i coupe AW 6AT, RB Turbos, PROcede 2.5 V5, Alpina Flash, Injen Intake, VK MW DP . Helix IC, Vishnu PnP Meth(M10 nozzel), M3 sides, OEM Aero Lip, VMR V710 Midnight Blue, LUX H8, HID Fogs, M3 front bits, D2 Copilovers, Whiteline Rear Bushing inserts, Custom M3 Steering Wheel, Cyba scoops, M2 Performance Exhaust
Chefcg1 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 07:20 PM   #8
Ramos
Colonel
 
Ramos's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 M235
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: So-Cal

Posts: 2,095
iTrader: (6)

Have you guys been watching Supercars Exposed?? That 800 HP Vette sounded mean !!!
Ramos is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-10-2009, 09:45 PM   #9
mwahlert
Lieutenant Colonel
 
mwahlert's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Durham, NC

Posts: 1,547
iTrader: (7)

Garage List
2007 335i  [0.00]
my friend had a 05 gto w/ a sts kit

8psi

mwahlert is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 12:48 AM   #10
Slidewayz
Major
 
Slidewayz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 335i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oakland, CA

Posts: 1,175
iTrader: (5)

Yeah, people have made rear mounted turbos work.

Stupid idea, though.

You lose a lot of enthalpy on the hot side with that long route and have high head loss pumping the air all the way back to the front of the car.
Slidewayz is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 12:52 AM   #11
darkphantom
Banned
 
Drives: E93 335i
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The place for Bimmers

Posts: 5,949
iTrader: (4)

Send a message via AIM to darkphantom
good idea conceptually, but application will not work on our cars for the obvious reasons of not enough room to work with.
darkphantom is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 02:23 AM   #12
GreenPlease
Lieutenant Colonel
 
GreenPlease's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW 335i e92
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orlando Florida

Posts: 1,635
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
STS style turbos = epic fail.
Care to elaborate? No disrespect, just curious.

Good point to the poster that mentioned head loss and enthalapy, but then again, this idea wasn't designed to be "efficient"

Enough room for piping for sure. If we can run dual 3" exhaust pipes, we can run single 3" exhaust, 3" charge pipe. I can't speak as to placing bypass and BOVs. Just an idea for big power, that's all...
GreenPlease is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 03:01 AM   #13
Antwerp
New Member
 
Drives: 05 Shit
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yes

Posts: 29
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ar design View Post
STS style turbos = epic fail.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianhn1 View Post
Too much piping.
+1
/end thread
Antwerp is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 03:03 AM   #14
O-cha
Brigadier General
 
O-cha's Avatar
 
Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

Posts: 4,729
iTrader: (2)

Send a message via AIM to O-cha
lol @ thinking bypass valves and blow off valves "shut down" turbos.
__________________
O-cha is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 12:18 PM   #15
smdandb2
this space left intentionally blank
 
smdandb2's Avatar
 
Drives: Blue One
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: BYU

Posts: 293
iTrader: (0)

STS is local to me and I was doing some contract work for them a year or two ago...

What a bunch of clowns. In fact, those dickwipes still owe me money now that I think about it.

They spend more time worrying about suing people for making rear mount turbo kits than taking care of their own business. Yes, they are suing people for making rear mount kits. They found some way to patent it.
smdandb2 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 12:31 PM   #16
Slidewayz
Major
 
Slidewayz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 335i
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oakland, CA

Posts: 1,175
iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkphantom View Post
good idea conceptually, but application will not work on our cars for the obvious reasons of not enough room to work with.
No, it's a crap idea conceptually. Please see above.

It would do Rube Goldberg proud.
Slidewayz is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 01:33 PM   #17
ar design
 
ar design's Avatar
 
Drives: '86 325ES+S50, '01 TT QC
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver, CO

Posts: 4,408
iTrader: (9)

Garage List
Send a message via AIM to ar design Send a message via MSN to ar design Send a message via Yahoo to ar design
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwahlert View Post
my friend had a 05 gto w/ a sts kit

8psi

I am making 660rwhp and 690rwtq on 10psi with a properly designed APS twin turbo kit. Powerband looks FAR better than that too. I need to swing by the dyno to pick up my chart, and I can post it. Could have pushed it much further, if not for our awesome 91 octane gas

STS style setups suffer from so many issues its not even funny - starting with the massive lag induced by 2,000ft of plumbing, and a turbo that is sitting way to far from the engine, allowing the exhaust gasses to cool and contract drastically. Then, we can start talking about the oiling issues, and bla bla bla bla bla
ar design is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 01:36 PM   #18
Zeph
Major
 
Drives: 2008 E92 335i 6MT SGM CR/BD
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southeast USA

Posts: 1,404
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via AIM to Zeph Send a message via Yahoo to Zeph
My biggest complaint is weight.

This is for dyno's, not actually tracking the car.
Zeph is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 04:24 PM   #19
GreenPlease
Lieutenant Colonel
 
GreenPlease's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW 335i e92
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orlando Florida

Posts: 1,635
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
STS style setups suffer from so many issues its not even funny - starting with the massive lag induced by 2,000ft of plumbing,
Not to beat a dead horse but if you read my original post the idea was to keep the stock turbos in place and gradually bring the larger snail online ala BMW's twin sequential turbo diesels.

Quote:
My biggest complaint is weight.
Probably a net gain of ~50lbs. Don't forget you'd be dropping the factory muffler (or any muffler for that matter).
GreenPlease is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 09:20 PM   #20
mwahlert
Lieutenant Colonel
 
mwahlert's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 335i
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Durham, NC

Posts: 1,547
iTrader: (7)

Garage List
2007 335i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar design View Post
I am making 660rwhp and 690rwtq on 10psi with a properly designed APS twin turbo kit. Powerband looks FAR better than that too. I need to swing by the dyno to pick up my chart, and I can post it. Could have pushed it much further, if not for our awesome 91 octane gas

STS style setups suffer from so many issues its not even funny - starting with the massive lag induced by 2,000ft of plumbing, and a turbo that is sitting way to far from the engine, allowing the exhaust gasses to cool and contract drastically. Then, we can start talking about the oiling issues, and bla bla bla bla bla
i know cause 500lb-ft at the rear wheels on 8 psi on an otherwise 100% stock motor by 4k rpm sucks.... especially considering the kit cost half that of a aps twin setup and was easy to install in a garage...and remove to turn the car back to stock....

and turbo lag on an already stout 6 liter really ruins it for a lot of ppl
mwahlert is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-11-2009, 11:00 PM   #21
GreenPlease
Lieutenant Colonel
 
GreenPlease's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW 335i e92
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orlando Florida

Posts: 1,635
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
and turbo lag on an already stout 6 liter really ruins it for a lot of ppl
GreenPlease is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2009, 03:20 AM   #22
munters
Captain
 
munters's Avatar
 
Drives: E91 335XI AT Dakota Black M
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Switzerland

Posts: 675
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mwahlert View Post
i know cause 500lb-ft at the rear wheels on 8 psi on an otherwise 100% stock motor by 4k rpm sucks.... especially considering the kit cost half that of a aps twin setup and was easy to install in a garage...and remove to turn the car back to stock....

and turbo lag on an already stout 6 liter really ruins it for a lot of ppl
+1
AR Design ARe most of the times "attacky" to whatever they don't have or use.
__________________
59 Corvette, 72 240Z, 73 Espada, ZXR
munters is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST