E90Post
 


GetBMWParts
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos > New Audi S4 underrated?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-06-2010, 11:00 AM   #1
hks786
Major General
United Kingdom
481
Rep
5,352
Posts

 
Drives: *
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

New Audi S4 underrated?

Quote:
To many people, Audi is replacing BMW as the go-to yuppie-mobile of choice. For one thing, Walter de'Silva's designs are almost universally lauded (Q7 notwithstanding) whereas the new crop of Bangled Bimmers are... controversial to put it as nicely as humanly possible. But it's not just down to looks and interior -- it can't be.

For the past decade or so Audi, BMW and of course Mercedes-Benz have all been engaged in mercilessly meeting each other tit-for-tat. 3/5/7 Series vs. 4/6/8 vs. C/E/S-Class, M/AMG/S, X5/ML/Q7, etc. It goes on forever. But the point is, Audi and BMW appear to be on equal footing and it looks like Audi has taken the copycat game to new heights.

Everyone knows that the BMW 335i is the most underrated car currently on the market in terms of raw thrust and grunt. BMW claims 300 hp and 300 torques, but even dogs know that BMW's trick 3.0-liter twin-turbo engine puts out much closer to 350 hp and 350 tire-spinning pound feet of torque. Why? Well, lower insurance rates for their customers probably isn't one of the reasons. However, remember that when the E90/E92 3 Series came out, BMW was still selling the 333 horsepower E46 M3. Meaning that it would be pretty hard to sell an older, $55,000 car with less power than a newer and just as quick $40,000 car. Or so the theory goes, though we should point out that BMW engineers angrily call us liars when we bring this scenario up.

And guess what? Looks like Audi is pulling the same trick with their new supercharged S4. Volkswagen and Audi tuner APR stuck a 2010 Audi S4 on an AWD-dyno and discovered the following. Instead of the 333 hp and 325 torques Audi is claiming, they pulled 331 hp and 336 pound-feet of torque... at the wheels! Figuring that AWD cars have about a 20% parasitic drivetrain power loss, the actual crank output of the S4 is huge. How huge? By our calculations just about 400 horsepower/torques. Gulp. Tip of the Audi driving cap to Brenton!
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/28/r...-is-underrated
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 11:02 AM   #2
hks786
Major General
United Kingdom
481
Rep
5,352
Posts

 
Drives: *
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 11:05 AM   #3
josephr25
Major
United_States
18
Rep
1,458
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 E92 335i
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Irvine, CA

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
If true... then wow.
__________________
"Yeah; well, my interior is better."
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 11:12 AM   #4
gonzo
Brigadier General
gonzo's Avatar
United_States
132
Rep
4,994
Posts

 
Drives: as many as possible
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: TeXXXas

iTrader: (0)

It would be nice to see a dyno from a member..if possible.

That is underrated to say the least if true.

I would like to go romp on one to check the butt dyno.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 12:24 PM   #5
philsteroni
Private First Class
Canada
1
Rep
144
Posts

 
Drives: 325xi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (1)

BS! It barely beats a 335 in straight by like .1-.2 seconds...costs about 10 grand more too...not very underrated if you ask me!
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 12:47 PM   #6
bdkevoIX
Captain
bdkevoIX's Avatar
11
Rep
740
Posts

 
Drives: 06 Evo IX Mr
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

331whp/336wtq sounds nice. But couple things need to be addressed to set up a valid comparison. Remember, dyno numbers are not absolute numbers. It's all relative.

First, you need to find out stock dyno numbers of the cars with well-established baseline such as evo, sti, 335i etc. Does an evo9 typically dyno around ~250whp on that dyno under similar condition? If so, then 331whp figure is much more believable.

Also, 331whp/336wtq should translate to more or less equivalent trap speed when run at 1/4 mile strip. At ~3800lbs (correct me if i'm wrong), s4 should run about ~110mph with that much power. Trust the trap speed, not the dyno number.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold.....
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 03:28 PM   #7
NYC6
Banned
United_States
29
Rep
2,078
Posts

 
Drives: '10 135i PPKI/06 C6 Z51 Vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LI/NY

iTrader: (0)

I havent seen a N54 come close to 350/350 bone stock. Dont know where they're getting these #'s from.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 03:56 PM   #8
bdkevoIX
Captain
bdkevoIX's Avatar
11
Rep
740
Posts

 
Drives: 06 Evo IX Mr
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC6 View Post
I havent seen a N54 come close to 350/350 bone stock. Dont know where they're getting these #'s from.
They're basing it off of stock dyno numbers N54's been producing.
Then they used the typical ricer math 15% to get the bhp/btq number.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold.....
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 03:57 PM   #9
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
No_Country
155
Rep
7,507
Posts

 
Drives: ????????????
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BMW M3 will get a V6TT

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
A stock S4 won't be producing 400hp and similar torque at the crank, it just won't happen. 360/360 is more believable.

If a stock S4 achieves more than 108-9mph in the 1/4mile run I will eat my hat.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 04:12 PM   #10
bdkevoIX
Captain
bdkevoIX's Avatar
11
Rep
740
Posts

 
Drives: 06 Evo IX Mr
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

I just saw a comparison vid, and a stock S4 trapped ~107mph. quite impressive.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold.....
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 05:34 PM   #11
domobrown
Banned
Austria
6
Rep
512
Posts

 
Drives: Audi RS5 S-Tronic
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Salzburg, Austria

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by philsteroni View Post
BS! It barely beats a 335 in straight by like .1-.2 seconds...costs about 10 grand more too...not very underrated if you ask me!
Because straight line is everything
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 05:38 PM   #12
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
No_Country
155
Rep
7,507
Posts

 
Drives: ????????????
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BMW M3 will get a V6TT

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdkevoIX View Post
I just saw a comparison vid, and a stock S4 trapped ~107mph. quite impressive.
Well there you go, 1-2mph of an improvement would be a tall order and I am sure someone with the right software can run the numbers to see how much PTW would be needed to achieve these speed in a 1/4mile run.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 06:10 PM   #13
S4to335
Brigadier General
United_States
113
Rep
4,377
Posts

 
Drives: 95 Audi S6
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
Did you guys see this....13.1 at 109 mph...stock

__________________

Car is now gone .... :-(
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 06:18 PM   #14
S4to335
Brigadier General
United_States
113
Rep
4,377
Posts

 
Drives: 95 Audi S6
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by footie View Post
A stock S4 won't be producing 400hp and similar torque at the crank, it just won't happen. 360/360 is more believable.

If a stock S4 achieves more than 108-9mph in the 1/4mile run I will eat my hat.

What kinda hat do you want.?
__________________

Car is now gone .... :-(
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 06:27 PM   #15
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
No_Country
155
Rep
7,507
Posts

 
Drives: ????????????
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BMW M3 will get a V6TT

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
I would hold on the hat until that is repeated by a consumers car. Read what you will about that statement.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 08:03 PM   #16
MrLOL
Private First Class
United Kingdom
1
Rep
100
Posts

 
Drives: An M3... one day !
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leeds, UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by S4to335 View Post
What kinda hat do you want.?
indeed

the audi forums are full of discussion about it

and Its not the only S4 that's made that sort of power at the dyno

http://forums.audiworld.com/showthread.php?t=2775335

Shame they're dull as dishwater however.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 08:35 PM   #17
bdkevoIX
Captain
bdkevoIX's Avatar
11
Rep
740
Posts

 
Drives: 06 Evo IX Mr
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

109mph stock
I want!
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold.....
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 10:53 PM   #18
NYC6
Banned
United_States
29
Rep
2,078
Posts

 
Drives: '10 135i PPKI/06 C6 Z51 Vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LI/NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdkevoIX View Post
They're basing it off of stock dyno numbers N54's been producing.
Then they used the typical ricer math 15% to get the bhp/btq number.
Thats my point. A car would have to produce 297.5 hp at the wheels to reach 350bhp. I have not seen one dyno that spun up that high with a bone stock car. Most seem to be in the 270rwhp (+-). Factor 15% and you get 310bhp.
Appreciate 0
      03-06-2010, 11:51 PM   #19
Nikolas
Colonel
20
Rep
2,068
Posts

 
Drives: 996 TT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sierra Mountains

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by philsteroni View Post
BS! It barely beats a 335 in straight by like .1-.2 seconds...costs about 10 grand more too...not very underrated if you ask me!
Gotta love Canadian Math!
Appreciate 0
      03-07-2010, 02:10 AM   #20
shiggy
Major
shiggy's Avatar
Canada
26
Rep
1,305
Posts

 
Drives: BMW 2009 M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vancouver

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
Gotta love Canadian Math!
huh?....their is nuthing wrong with canadien math...i was grate in math and and got strate A's...I can outmath any Amarican any day of the weak!!!
We have moor accountaints per kapita than any cuntry out their!!!!
__________________
2009 Jet Black E92 M3, DCT, Nav, Novillo Leather, PDC, EDC, BBS CHR's 20", Yokohama Advan Sports Tires, Eiback Pro-Kit Springs, Dinan Pullies and Dinan Stage1 software, black grills, black side gills, alcantara shift and ebrake boot.
Appreciate 0
      03-07-2010, 04:30 AM   #21
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
No_Country
155
Rep
7,507
Posts

 
Drives: ????????????
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BMW M3 will get a V6TT

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 E92 M3  [0.00]
The info from Audiworld.com states that in 'that' dyno run the S4 in question made 306hp and 295ft/lbs, if you believe the latest quattro loses 20% then the figure we end up with is 382hp and approx 370ft/lbs, it's starting to get closer to my own estimates but then again this is assuming the latest drivetrain loses 20%.

What figure do you get if it only loses approximately 15%.
Appreciate 0
      03-07-2010, 10:11 AM   #22
TSM330i
2006 330i, TSM, Black, manual, sport
TSM330i's Avatar
United_States
74
Rep
3,134
Posts

 
Drives: E90 330i, E86 Z4 3.0si
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester Springs, PA

iTrader: (2)

There are many issues with chassis dyno's. They are good for measuring before and after mod increases, but for actual crank hp, they are not as accurate.
I spoke to the guys who build the Corvette racing engines (yes, Katech) and they said that all new Z06's make right about 505hp. Chassis dyno's are just not that accurate. Every engine Katech has put on an engine dyno made the correct hp. I don't believe the Audi is make 400 hp until it's put on an engine dyno.
__________________
2006 330i, TSM, Black, Sport, JIC Cross Coil-Overs, UUC Sways, 18" Advan RS, Mich PSS 255/265, BMW Electric Steering Wheel, Rogue shifter, M-Tech front, CF emblems, Dinan TB, Intake, exhaust, strut bar, Stoptech BBK, LSD, M3 susp., LUX 5, CF Hood and CSL, Sparco Seats, AA tune, CF Roof
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST