E90Post
 


Evolve Automotive
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BMW E90/E92/E93 3-series General Forums > Regional Forums > UK > UK Technical Forum > Replacing run flats



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-06-2013, 04:22 AM   #1
Richardoe92
Enlisted Member
 
Drives: 320 d M Sport coupe
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Yorkshire

Posts: 34
iTrader: (0)

Replacing run flats

Hello guys not strictly sure of whether I'm posting in the right place, but here goes.
I have a 320d coupe with 19" 225m wheels.
If I swap out the rf tyres for non run flats, what load ratings should I look for?
I understand the tyre sizes are the same, however, I have had contradictory advice on load ratings, even to the point of being told not to do it (by a very well known online tyre dealer), also, if there are any other potential "issues" I would be grateful if you could advise.

Regards,

Richard.
Richardoe92 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-06-2013, 04:32 AM   #2
m1bjr
LSD - No, you're not seeing things
 
m1bjr's Avatar
 
Drives: RS250 CUP
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somerset UK

Posts: 3,313
iTrader: (4)

Send a message via MSN to m1bjr
Search.

Millions of threads on here.

You just have to type and read
__________________
m1bjr is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      04-06-2013, 04:33 AM   #3
Igor
New Member
 
Drives: BMW e46
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Epsom

Posts: 7
iTrader: (0)

I think load index its 88 (same like rf).There is no potentail issues.
Igor is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
      04-06-2013, 05:46 AM   #4
Hotcoupe
Major General
 
Hotcoupe's Avatar
 
Drives: Don't know yet!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK

Posts: 6,098
iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richardoe92 View Post
even to the point of being told not to do it (by a very well known online tyre dealer)
Could only be that well known idiot who picks up the phone @ Camskill,it's time they put him out in the yard with a broom!
__________________
=================================


Never argue with an idiot on the internet. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Hotcoupe is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      04-06-2013, 06:27 AM   #5
Igor
New Member
 
Drives: BMW e46
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Epsom

Posts: 7
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotcoupe View Post
Could only be that well known idiot who picks up the phone @ Camskill,it's time they put him out in the yard with a broom!
Igor is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
      04-06-2013, 01:48 PM   #6
dopper99
Brigadier General
 
dopper99's Avatar
 
Drives: F30 335d M Sport
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK

Posts: 3,794
iTrader: (1)

With regards load ratings, I'd read to replace with XL tyres so that's what I did a couple of weeks ago and had no problems whatsoever.
Before, the run flats on my 18s were 88 and 90. I changed to Good Year asymmetric 2 non run flat with 92 and 94. The reason being is is didn't what to lose the turn-in so went for the stiffer side wall higher load tyre. Result is no difference at all with the steering - just a better all round drive. Although no idea what it would be like fitting non run flats with lower load ratings.
dopper99 is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2013, 06:53 AM   #7
Richardoe92
Enlisted Member
 
Drives: 320 d M Sport coupe
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Yorkshire

Posts: 34
iTrader: (0)

Thanks for your replies lads, after a quick search /look around on line it appears that using XL tyres with = or higher load ratings will do the trick.
Now just gotta save the pennies!
Richardoe92 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2013, 06:54 AM   #8
Richardoe92
Enlisted Member
 
Drives: 320 d M Sport coupe
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Yorkshire

Posts: 34
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dopper99 View Post
With regards load ratings, I'd read to replace with XL tyres so that's what I did a couple of weeks ago and had no problems whatsoever.
Before, the run flats on my 18s were 88 and 90. I changed to Good Year asymmetric 2 non run flat with 92 and 94. The reason being is is didn't what to lose the turn-in so went for the stiffer side wall higher load tyre. Result is no difference at all with the steering - just a better all round drive. Although no idea what it would be like fitting non run flats with lower load ratings.
Cheers mate, you confirm that the way I had read it was correct.
Richardoe92 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-07-2013, 03:55 PM   #9
dopper99
Brigadier General
 
dopper99's Avatar
 
Drives: F30 335d M Sport
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK

Posts: 3,794
iTrader: (1)

The slightly higher load rating bears no resemblance to the god-awful rock hard side walls of the run flats so don't be concerned you will end up with as stiff side walls as run flats. Not at all. Even with the slightly higher load rating the ride is MUCH more comfortable and the annoying skipping you get when going over pot holes is gone.
Also, you can actually get steering feel back again, just like every other car that does not have run flats fitted.

You can see why BMW dont want to ruin the handling experience of the M3, M5 etc... by fitting non run flats as standard. By doing this, they are already half way to making a great handling car.
dopper99 is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST