E90Post
 


GT Haus
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BMW E90/E92/E93 3-series General Forums > Regional Forums > UK > BMW E92 320i M Sport Coupe (2007) Advice - Much Appreciated !!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-07-2013, 09:31 AM   #1
deeebo8452
Private
 
Drives: BMW E92 320d M Sport Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London

Posts: 79
iTrader: (0)

BMW E92 320i M Sport Coupe (2007) Advice - Much Appreciated !!

Hi I am really in need of some advice.

I am stuck between choosing between a BMW 320i M Sport Coupe (2007) or a BMW 320d SE (2007). From what I have read the diesels are by far a better option given they give 58.9mpg vs petrols 42.1mpg approx. Also apparently the diesels are 6 cylinder whereas the petrols are 4 cylinder, is that right? And if so what does that mean exactly? However the M Sport looks much better than the SE. The obvious thing to do would be to get a 320d M Sport however they are about 1000 more, can I really justify that outlay and will I get that back on sale.

I have also heard a lot regarding issues with the 320i engines, however isn't the 320i M Sport engine different to 320i SE engine? What exactly are the issues concerning these engines. I have read mostly about sluggish performance (is it that bad when I drove it seems okay) and coil/plug/injector problems - are these costly? And if I check that they have already been replaced can the issue still remain or arise again?

The 3 cars I have shortlisted are as follows:

1. BMW 320i M Sport Coupe 2007 63k mileage - 10,000
2. BMW 320d M Sport Coupe 2007 74k mileage - 10,500
3. BMW 320d SE Coupe 2007 78k mileage - 10,000

Any advice please and thanks in advance. I am looking to make a decision within the next 2-3 days
deeebo8452 is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 09:36 AM   #2
AnthonyR
Captain
 
AnthonyR's Avatar
 
Drives: Audi A5 3.0 TDI Sport
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London/Watford

Posts: 657
iTrader: (0)

Do take in to consideration the extra service costs involved with diesels.
AnthonyR is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 09:39 AM   #3
creepy coupe
Major General
 
creepy coupe's Avatar
 
Drives: M235i
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK

Posts: 8,162
iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2009 335i  [0.00]
A 320d is a four pot engine.

It's the same engine in either SE or M sport.The latter is really about cosmetic changes and suspension.
creepy coupe is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 09:42 AM   #4
#-JONAS-#
Private
 
Drives: E92 320D BLACK
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Spain

Posts: 98
iTrader: (0)

I would go for one of the Diesel's, the power in a 320D is incredible compared to the 320i. Although you will have to get the diesel's checked by a mechanic because they do have some expensive problems.
#-JONAS-# is offline   Spain
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 09:43 AM   #5
P 5UML
Major
 
P 5UML's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW E92 325D M Sport
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: London

Posts: 1,463
iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-JONAS-# View Post
I would go for one of the Diesel's, the power in a 320D is incredible compared to the 320i. Although you will have to get the diesel's checked by a mechanic because they do have some expensive problems.
+1 mate
__________________
P 5UML is online now   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 09:52 AM   #6
MEGA
Dieseasal
 
MEGA's Avatar
 
Drives: LCI E92 335d M-Sport
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Harrow, London

Posts: 6,825
iTrader: (2)

Send a message via MSN to MEGA
Get a 57 plate 320d mate, with efficient dynamics. The non ed version has MUCH MUCH worse fuel economy. Not to mention concerns about longevity of the turbo..

The easiest hint is the tail pipe: Straight means good, droopy means bad.

Both engines are 4 pot petrol v diesel.

I didn't answer your other petrol questions as there's no point. Get the 320d as the 320i is underpowered and riddled with reliability issues.
__________________
Previously: 2003 Peugeot 206 1.6 8v | 2006 E90 320d M-Sport, 19" BBS CH, Full Ice-cold JL audio install, August 2010 Total BMW 6 page feature car. | 2003 Nissan 350Z GT Coupe 286BHP
Now:2010 E92 LCI 335d M-Sport
MEGA is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 09:54 AM   #7
MEGA
Dieseasal
 
MEGA's Avatar
 
Drives: LCI E92 335d M-Sport
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Harrow, London

Posts: 6,825
iTrader: (2)

Send a message via MSN to MEGA
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyR View Post
Do take in to consideration the extra service costs involved with diesels.
Such as? I have had diesel BMWs for 5 years and am not aware of any extra service costs? Except for the DPF: But in that case I'd retort "Do take in to consideration the extra service costs involved with replacing the injectors and fuel pumps every few thousand miles on the petrols".

Without wanting to start a mudslinging match, I'd say it's as broad as it's long. The diesel engine garnering a slightly higher initial purchase price due to the initial cost of the engine but also boasting better residuals meaning you'll make that money back when you sell the car.

There's no justification imho to get any petrol E9x bar the 330 if your a naturally aspirated purist: Or the 335i - which is a great car.
__________________
Previously: 2003 Peugeot 206 1.6 8v | 2006 E90 320d M-Sport, 19" BBS CH, Full Ice-cold JL audio install, August 2010 Total BMW 6 page feature car. | 2003 Nissan 350Z GT Coupe 286BHP
Now:2010 E92 LCI 335d M-Sport
MEGA is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 10:49 AM   #8
shrink
Captain
 
shrink's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 325i SE
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Edinburgh (UK)

Posts: 752
iTrader: (2)

well.. the 325i is pretty good

but yeah, the 4 pot petrol in the 320i is pretty weak, quite flawed and will leave you wanting more. the 320D is at least pretty potent in the midrange, quite refined and has tuning potential too.
shrink is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 10:52 AM   #9
gIzzE
Major General
 
gIzzE's Avatar
 
Drives: E350 cdi Estate.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK.

Posts: 5,083
iTrader: (2)

Got to be the 320d.

I love my petrols, and love 4 cyl petrols that need revving but even my BMW dealer says avoid the 320i because of the failure rate.
Considering how few they sell, they see a hell of a lot in the shop.
gIzzE is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 11:39 AM   #10
deeebo8452
Private
 
Drives: BMW E92 320d M Sport Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London

Posts: 79
iTrader: (0)

Sorry in advance for the stupid question but whats a 4 pot engine mean and if the diesels are 4 pot what are the petrols? And whats the difference?

Quote:
Originally Posted by creepy coupe View Post
A 320d is a four pot engine.

It's the same engine in either SE or M sport.The latter is really about cosmetic changes and suspension.
deeebo8452 is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 11:42 AM   #11
deeebo8452
Private
 
Drives: BMW E92 320d M Sport Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London

Posts: 79
iTrader: (0)

Thanks for your reply mate. With regards to the DPF, what kind of costs would this incur and how likely/often does this need to be seen to? Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by MEGA View Post
Such as? I have had diesel BMWs for 5 years and am not aware of any extra service costs? Except for the DPF: But in that case I'd retort "Do take in to consideration the extra service costs involved with replacing the injectors and fuel pumps every few thousand miles on the petrols".

Without wanting to start a mudslinging match, I'd say it's as broad as it's long. The diesel engine garnering a slightly higher initial purchase price due to the initial cost of the engine but also boasting better residuals meaning you'll make that money back when you sell the car.

There's no justification imho to get any petrol E9x bar the 330 if your a naturally aspirated purist: Or the 335i - which is a great car.
deeebo8452 is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 12:14 PM   #12
Ascension335i
Enlisted Member
 
Drives: E93 335i M Sport
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London

Posts: 37
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tahirsplace View Post
Sorry in advance for the stupid question but whats a 4 pot engine mean and if the diesels are 4 pot what are the petrols? And whats the difference?
4 pot = 4 cylinder

Both the 320d and 320i are 4 cylinder engines in respective diesel and petrol form.

325/330i and 325/330d are 6 cylinder engines, or "6 pot".
Ascension335i is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 12:41 PM   #13
ed330D
Private
 
Drives: E92 330D
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SW France

Posts: 76
iTrader: (0)

It appears that some 320Ds built from late 2007 to early 2008 have a serious timing chain problem that is very expensive to fix: 2000 if caught before it breaks; upto 10,000 if it breaks. Be very careful. I wouldn't touch one without a very comprehensive 12 month warranty.
ed330D is offline   France
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 02:49 PM   #14
AdamC
Captain
 
AdamC's Avatar
 
Drives: E92
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West Midlands - UK

Posts: 671
iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by ed330D
It appears that some 320Ds built from late 2007 to early 2008 have a serious timing chain problem that is very expensive to fix: 2000 if caught before it breaks; upto 10,000 if it breaks. Be very careful. I wouldn't touch one without a very comprehensive 12 month warranty.
Any ideas on how this can be checked?
AdamC is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 06:14 PM   #15
MEGA
Dieseasal
 
MEGA's Avatar
 
Drives: LCI E92 335d M-Sport
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Harrow, London

Posts: 6,825
iTrader: (2)

Send a message via MSN to MEGA
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamC View Post
Any ideas on how this can be checked?
It's not so common. The internet tends to blow things out of proportion.

However, if you can hear and rattles (other than the engine note! heh... ) don't buy that one

They tend to last 100k or so at a minimum.. So lower mileage ones aren't really an issue.

It's interesting to hear that it only happened for 6 months or so of builds? I'd not previously heard that part of the story..
__________________
Previously: 2003 Peugeot 206 1.6 8v | 2006 E90 320d M-Sport, 19" BBS CH, Full Ice-cold JL audio install, August 2010 Total BMW 6 page feature car. | 2003 Nissan 350Z GT Coupe 286BHP
Now:2010 E92 LCI 335d M-Sport
MEGA is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 06:30 PM   #16
mob17
Brigadier General
 
mob17's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 335D
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: East Middle Land, UK

Posts: 3,480
iTrader: (4)

Diesel, for pretty much what everyone has already said.

Tuning potential is something you don't want to overlook. On a 320D you can get quite large increases of torque, and hp, relatively cheaply. Some drivers will find a faster car fast at first (obviously), but after a while it can feel sluggish. Then if you remap/box it it's like driving a new car again

And i actually prefer SE's as the ride is better.
__________________
2008 E92 335D SE
2010 E90 320D SE
1994 E36 318I SE
1996 E36 316I SE
mob17 is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 06:34 PM   #17
MEGA
Dieseasal
 
MEGA's Avatar
 
Drives: LCI E92 335d M-Sport
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Harrow, London

Posts: 6,825
iTrader: (2)

Send a message via MSN to MEGA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mob17 View Post
Diesel, for pretty much what everyone has already said.

Tuning potential is something you don't want to overlook. On a 320D you can get quite large increases of torque, and hp, relatively cheaply. Some drivers will find a faster car fast at first (obviously), but after a while it can feel sluggish. Then if you remap/box it it's like driving a new car again

And i actually prefer SE's as the ride is better.
Parallels with meeting woman in bars there. The plain one might give you a better ride, but I'd take the looker if I had the opportunity.

Plus ride is subjective. I prefer it hard anyway.

__________________
Previously: 2003 Peugeot 206 1.6 8v | 2006 E90 320d M-Sport, 19" BBS CH, Full Ice-cold JL audio install, August 2010 Total BMW 6 page feature car. | 2003 Nissan 350Z GT Coupe 286BHP
Now:2010 E92 LCI 335d M-Sport
MEGA is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-07-2013, 07:39 PM   #18
AlanQS
Colonel
 
AlanQS's Avatar
 
Drives: 320d SE Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow

Posts: 2,508
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I'd echo a few of the comments here.
In terms of engines, the 320i has had a lot of problems and getting an older one is only going to make sure you experience them.
In terms of the 320d you really only want to consider one built from September 07. That was the start of the efficient dynamic models and is most easily identified by having auto start/stop. It has a more powerful, and cleaner engine and far better fuel consumption than the previous model.

The Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) is only potentially a problem if the car regularly does short journeys where the engine doesn't get up to operating temperature (or if you do many short journeys). This applies to all diesel engines with a DPF (now mandatory on new cars). Replacing it will cost in the region of 1,400. Sadly, I mainly do short journeys nowadays but, touch wood, at five years old, I have not had a problem with my DPF yet.

However, if it's OK when you buy it and you do regular decent mileage on your commute, I wouldn't bother about it.

It is believed (a certain amount of urban myth probably) that the diesel turbos can be suspect after 60,000 miles. This idea stems mainly from the previous 3 series model (the E46) which didn't seem to go past this figure with any reliability.

The ONLY real differences between the SE and the m-sport is in looks. You do get sports seats and 18" alloys as standard and you get a lowered suspension which, whilst it might look good, requires you to have a strong spine though cars after September 07 aren't quite as spine jarring as those before. The rest of the differences (amounting to 2,000 when new) are purely cosmetic and simply a matter of individual taste.

In terms of road holding and handling differences between SE and M-Sport, they are so close that it would take a skilled driver on a race track to demonstrate any differences between them - even then, the result could be affected by the amount of coffee the driver had, before going out to test them.

Anyone who says the m-sport is miles faster round the twisties is talking bullshit. The m-sport is purely about looks.

So your choices appear to be between a 320d m-sport or SE. Mind you, if fuel costs aren't an issue, you could get a 325i SE for less than a 320d m-sport.
__________________
AlanQS is offline   Scotland
0
Reply With Quote
      02-08-2013, 01:45 AM   #19
dxb335d
The Tarmac Terrorist
 
dxb335d's Avatar
 
Drives: E46 M3 CS
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''

Posts: 29,262
iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEGA View Post
Such as? I have had diesel BMWs for 5 years and am not aware of any extra service costs? Except for the DPF: But in that case I'd retort "Do take in to consideration the extra service costs involved with replacing the injectors and fuel pumps every few thousand miles on the petrols".

Without wanting to start a mudslinging match, I'd say it's as broad as it's long. The diesel engine garnering a slightly higher initial purchase price due to the initial cost of the engine but also boasting better residuals meaning you'll make that money back when you sell the car.

There's no justification imho to get any petrol E9x bar the 330 if your a naturally aspirated purist: Or the 335i - which is a great car.
+1
__________________
M3 gone .... But I now have a M3 CS
dxb335d is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
      02-08-2013, 01:46 AM   #20
dxb335d
The Tarmac Terrorist
 
dxb335d's Avatar
 
Drives: E46 M3 CS
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''

Posts: 29,262
iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by mob17 View Post
Diesel, for pretty much what everyone has already said.

Tuning potential is something you don't want to overlook. On a 320D you can get quite large increases of torque, and hp, relatively cheaply. Some drivers will find a faster car fast at first (obviously), but after a while it can feel sluggish. Then if you remap/box it it's like driving a new car again

And i actually prefer SE's as the ride is better.
Your 335d SE won't ride any better, it has identical suspension to te Msport
__________________
M3 gone .... But I now have a M3 CS
dxb335d is offline   England
0
Reply With Quote
      02-08-2013, 02:14 AM   #21
mob17
Brigadier General
 
mob17's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 335D
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: East Middle Land, UK

Posts: 3,480
iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxb335d View Post
Your 335d SE won't ride any better, it has identical suspension to te Msport
Haha I know mate, we're talking about the 320 here
__________________
2008 E92 335D SE
2010 E90 320D SE
1994 E36 318I SE
1996 E36 316I SE
mob17 is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      02-08-2013, 02:22 AM   #22
coopersim
Captain
 
coopersim's Avatar
 
Drives: VW Lupo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Berks

Posts: 775
iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxb335d View Post
Your 335d SE won't ride any better, it has identical suspension to te Msport
Depends if the M Sport suspension option was removed at the time of purchase, by default it has M Sport suspension.
coopersim is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST