View Single Post
      07-05-2016, 01:28 PM   #70
Expert@ApexWheels
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Expert@ApexWheels's Avatar
3530
Rep
6,752
Posts


Drives: M3
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefoot335i View Post
Any Update on the 18x9 ET 30/31 that was mentioned in the Group Buy?
We are expecting these new 18x9" et30 units in at the very end of July or first week of August.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwe45bb View Post
What setup is this? Looks like 18's, profile 3 F&R with perfect fitment IMO. This is what I'm looking for.... Thanks!
You are spot on sir, this gentleman is running the ARC-8 18x9.5 et35 in a square fitment. Depending on your suspension setup, you will need spacers up front to clear your suspension properly. Furthermore, stretching 245/35-18 tires is about the only way to get these 9.5" wheels to fit up front without having to dial in negative camber. From a performance perspective, this is really not advised.

We just launched our new ARC-8 18x9" et30 application, and as mentioned above they are due to arrive soon. This is really the better choice for e9X owners looking to run a concave fitment on all four corners, as it is a direct fit up front (better inner clearance) so that you do not have to mess with spacers. Also, 245 tire's are a more appropriate fit on a 9" wheel.

For those looking to maximize traction/grip, 255/35-18 tires can also be used with the 18x9's, and in many cases are a direct fit (light scrubbing inside the fender liners is possible at full lock etc.). Those using track oriented compounds (extreme summer tires & r-comps) will likely need to dial in negative camber up front to prevent rubbing the front fenders.

- Ryan
__________________
Appreciate 0