[ttribe]

Originally Posted by divisionbell77

He sells the product. He can put his two cents in all he wishes.

First it was he shouldn't because of some financial backlash or whatever nonsense you were able to fish out of your rear, now it is only BMS that can respond.

Whats your third made up reasoning?

Oh good grief...I expressed the opinion that I thought it was a bad idea for a vendor claiming to be independent of the parties to be inserting himself into the fray. That's it. That's all. If you calmed down for half a moment, you might find I've taken a position on nothing else, including the underlying fight. The fact of the matter is this thread supports my position - rightly or wrongly (I honestly have no idea), Mike is now painted as being in bed with BMS. That's a bad thing under the circumstances.

BTW, I thought Mike said he didn't sell this particular BMS product. Did I miss something?