|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Can you get 1000 miles from a tank?
|
|
08-18-2011, 11:15 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 564
Posts
Drives: e90 320D ED
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Royal Berkshire
|
Can you get 1000 miles from a tank?
I have seen people say they can from their 320D Efficient Dynamics, so i thought i would see what i could do on a trip to Yorkshire and back yesterday, well, I was quite suprised to see that after 467 miles, i still had just over half a tank. on the way up, average speed was 72 on cruise, and on the way home i took a more sedate 62mph. journey time funnily was about the same 4hrs.
So in short, i think that 1000 miles is quite easily possible for the ED! In todays high fuel price world, i just though anyone thinking of one for a co car should deffo look at one of these!! if not just for the 13% BIK rate! boring MPG thread over.
__________________
Its all about the mpg!
|
08-18-2011, 11:19 AM | #2 |
Captain
65
Rep 824
Posts
Drives: BMW 530e G30
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Leeds
|
The new passat is advertised as being able to do 1000 miles per tank as well i think?
__________________
BMW 530e G30
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 12:48 PM | #4 |
The Tarmac Terrorist
957
Rep 29,345
Posts
Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''
|
I Wouldn't want too. Would Be so boring!!
__________________
997.2 GT3
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 12:52 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 564
Posts
Drives: e90 320D ED
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Royal Berkshire
|
there is a time and a place though, a 500 mile round trip for work on all motorways, whats the point in it costing me money? leave in enough time so not to have to rush and not get stressed with knobheads sitting in the middle/fast lane! i got home uber relaxed last night..
__________________
Its all about the mpg!
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 01:03 PM | #6 |
Major
39
Rep 1,194
Posts |
Agree with this. I left for a meeting today, having to go round the M25. It was wet and I had loads of time.
Managed 23mpg! * * In the M6, not the ED!!! |
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 01:10 PM | #7 |
Banned
77
Rep 2,927
Posts
Drives: E60 530D M SPORT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: england
|
i could if i have a bigger fuel tank
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 01:13 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant
18
Rep 442
Posts
Drives: E92 335i M Sport
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bristol
|
I can only get 450 miles per tank.. Less than half what you are getting. But I get more smiles per mile
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 01:15 PM | #9 |
Captain
65
Rep 824
Posts
Drives: BMW 530e G30
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Leeds
|
I can get about 600 without too much hard work
__________________
BMW 530e G30
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 03:20 PM | #11 | |
Major General
1882
Rep 7,000
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 03:25 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant
37
Rep 408
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 03:37 PM | #13 |
Major General
141
Rep 6,912
Posts |
I could if I pushed it
Would be very lucky to do 1000 miles in three tanks
__________________
E92 M3, Jerez Black, Fox Red Novillo, 19'' M Double Spoke, folding mirrors, lumbar support, front seat heating, PDC, USB, DAB, EDC, Bluetooth, Logic 7, High Gloss Shadowline, big smile
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-18-2011, 10:15 PM | #14 |
Colonel
54
Rep 2,197
Posts |
If you are on a mission to see how far you can go on one tank, you could probably pull 1,000 miles out of a 330d.
But then you would be: - driving at 45-50mph - no air-con - probably do it on a European motorway, because of less traffic |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 03:38 AM | #15 |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 564
Posts
Drives: e90 320D ED
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Royal Berkshire
|
I really dont think you could, best i ever got on mine was about 850..
__________________
Its all about the mpg!
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 03:39 AM | #16 |
Dieseasal
204
Rep 6,881
Posts |
What the hell I got 400 from my 320d last tank and was actually happy with it!
EDIT: It did include 80 miles at approx 140mph on a private runway near the M40 on the day of the Gaydon show. With about 15 other cars that were also at the show. It's nice how the owners of these runways let you just have a play with your car
__________________
Previously: 2003 Peugeot 206 1.6 8v | 2006 E90 320d M-Sport, 19" BBS CH, Full Ice-cold JL audio install, August 2010 Total BMW 6 page feature car. | 2003 Nissan 350Z GT Coupe 286BHP
Now:2010 E92 LCI 335d M-Sport |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 03:40 AM | #17 |
Dieseasal
204
Rep 6,881
Posts |
Also I have a non-ED model (2006) which is about 10mpg worse than the new 180 bhp 320d ED
Also a "tank" for me is just under 60 litres.. Just filled up from 15m range last night and it cost me £87 in shell v-power.
__________________
Previously: 2003 Peugeot 206 1.6 8v | 2006 E90 320d M-Sport, 19" BBS CH, Full Ice-cold JL audio install, August 2010 Total BMW 6 page feature car. | 2003 Nissan 350Z GT Coupe 286BHP
Now:2010 E92 LCI 335d M-Sport |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 03:58 AM | #18 | |
has left the building
90
Rep 3,359
Posts |
Quote:
However, I do spend all day up and down the hills of Sheffield in stop/start traffic. If ever I get on a run the difference is amazing. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 04:04 AM | #19 |
Lieutenant
26
Rep 564
Posts
Drives: e90 320D ED
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Royal Berkshire
|
The proper Efficient Dynamic model is detuned to 163bhp so to get under the magic 110co2's. most newer ones have some of the ED technologies on them though. at least you dont have to put up with shit 16" alloys like mine! non upgradable too!
__________________
Its all about the mpg!
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 06:03 AM | #20 |
Captain
77
Rep 879
Posts |
550 BEST from 325d Auto
Out of interest, can anyone explain in laymans terms the tax implication on business use fuel? The car will be leased by me personally, but the co. will part pay for the lease Last edited by coopersim; 08-19-2011 at 10:34 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 06:11 AM | #21 |
Major
35
Rep 1,281
Posts
Drives: E93 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK (West Mids)
|
no way would need 4-5 tanks!
__________________
E93 M3 | Azurite Black | Extended Bamboo Leather | Piano Black Trim | 19" 220M Wheels | Shadowline Trim | Edition Grills M DCT | HDD iDrive | EDC | Bluetooth | Front & Rear PDC | Heated Seats | DAB Radio | Hi-Fi Speakers | USB Audio | SmartTOP |
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2011, 06:34 AM | #22 | |
Brigadier General
192
Rep 4,655
Posts |
Quote:
One of the key highlights of the M1 Abrams is it's Gas Turbine engine, yet is still only manages around 265 miles operational range before refuelling. It has a 1,900 litre gas tank, so my guess is that's not a fantastic MPG. Despite that, as this Wikipedia article suggest, it is pretty fucking fly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_Abrams Despite the disheartening news about the M1 Abrams, lets not forget that it is a Main Battle Tank meaning it has to be tough and heavily armoured, plus its armed to the teeth and has a lot of optional extras. I've recently done a little bit of research into more economical tanks and although I've not found one that has an operational range of 1000 miles, there are some MBT's that will get closer to 500. Take the Leopard 2 for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_2 As it's German and therefore equipped with the military equivalent of 'Efficient Dynamics' it actually achieves about 340 miles from only 1,200 litres of fuel. You'll be pleased to note it also features a twin turbo diesel engine, not some fancy gas bollocks for hippies. Proof really that proper engines are still better. I expect like everything, there is a tradeoff though and some might say that the Abrams should have the 'extras' to fuck a Leopard up royally. Some would be American though, because that's a fucking stupid opinion. Everyone and I mean EVERYONE outside of Texas knows that the Leopard 2 is the best 'all round' tank in the world. Lets look at the facts - both have basically the same gun, which is a German design. WTF were the Yanks thinking there? Who knows. Anyway, in actual fact the Germans have actually adapted most of their Leopards to use a later revision of the same gun, meaning in terms of armaments the Leopard has more basic stopping power. Sorry I've digressed. In short, I doubt you will get 1000 miles from a tank, or not a Main Battle Tank at least. Even despite the lack of side and rear armour nowadays (a fully armoured King Tiger would have done less than 100 miles total range) I still can't see it being a big priority for the worlds governments to spend their money on. Shame really. Regards Matt |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|