|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
No 335d in Evo
|
|
10-20-2010, 03:40 AM | #89 |
Major General
1442
Rep 8,169
Posts |
The email that arrives whenever something is added.
__________________
Ian
Current: 2021 G21 330i M-Sport Previous: 2018 A6 Avant S-Line MMI+, 2014 F31 320d M-Sport, 2013 F10 520d M-Sport, 2011 F10 530d M-Sport, 2008 320i M-Sport Coupe, 2002 325i, 2001 318i valvetronic, 1998 318i, 1996 525i, 1990 Porsche 944S2 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 04:20 AM | #90 | |
Major General
1561
Rep 8,971
Posts |
Quote:
0-0mph in 3 hrs waiting for the AA. Anyway, are you calling me a 'usual' - I don't recall saying the 335i is better? IMO there is no need to state the obvious |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 04:50 AM | #91 |
Banned
176
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Dough - I'm getting uppity so am throwing reason out of the window as per usual ;-)
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 05:09 AM | #92 |
Colonel
280
Rep 2,774
Posts |
Surely anyone with half a brain knows there is a 'pecking' order of our beloved cars engine wise.(not getting into gearbox or SE/Msport debate or coupe/saloon/hearse/vert debate)
Top Dog = M3 Then, in order 335i 335d 330d 330i 325d 325i 320d 320i then some eco chariots Job done |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 06:04 AM | #93 |
Major General
170
Rep 5,950
Posts
Drives: M3 Comp Pack / QQ+2 Tekna
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2008 350Z GT Roadster [2.00]
2004 Honda S2000 [0.00] 2005 Nissan 350Z GT ... [0.00] 2006 E92 BMW 335i SE [9.00] 2003 Maserati 4200 [6.00] 2006 E90 330d M Sport [0.00] |
Interesting you put the 'i' above the 'd' in the 335's but the other way round for the rest; wouldn't the pattern follow all the way down the list??
__________________
Current -: MW E92 M3 Competition Pack / Qashqai+2 Tekna 1.6dci
Gone -: 370Z GT Roadster; BMW X3 3.0d xdrive M Sport; E46 330i M Sport Coupe; Mazda RX8 231; Nissan 350Z GT Roadster; BMW E90 330d M Sport; BMW E92 335i SE; Maserati 4200; Nissan 350Z; Honda S2000; Astra Coupe Turbo; Ford Probe |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 06:12 AM | #94 | |
Colonel
280
Rep 2,774
Posts |
Quote:
Lower down the pecking order I surmise the diesels are slightly better then their equivalents Plus I have a 335i and I said so |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 06:35 AM | #95 |
Major General
170
Rep 5,950
Posts
Drives: M3 Comp Pack / QQ+2 Tekna
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2008 350Z GT Roadster [2.00]
2004 Honda S2000 [0.00] 2005 Nissan 350Z GT ... [0.00] 2006 E92 BMW 335i SE [9.00] 2003 Maserati 4200 [6.00] 2006 E90 330d M Sport [0.00] |
Can't argue with the science used there .
__________________
Current -: MW E92 M3 Competition Pack / Qashqai+2 Tekna 1.6dci
Gone -: 370Z GT Roadster; BMW X3 3.0d xdrive M Sport; E46 330i M Sport Coupe; Mazda RX8 231; Nissan 350Z GT Roadster; BMW E90 330d M Sport; BMW E92 335i SE; Maserati 4200; Nissan 350Z; Honda S2000; Astra Coupe Turbo; Ford Probe |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 06:46 AM | #96 |
Banned
176
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
The 335i is above the 335d because it costs more to run and tax and far more to look after once it starts to break down.
However a d is more expensive to buy and was once owned by BMW legend Sir Carlos of DXB. So it gets a few more points. All in all, it's about even. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 06:51 AM | #97 |
Major General
170
Rep 5,950
Posts
Drives: M3 Comp Pack / QQ+2 Tekna
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2008 350Z GT Roadster [2.00]
2004 Honda S2000 [0.00] 2005 Nissan 350Z GT ... [0.00] 2006 E92 BMW 335i SE [9.00] 2003 Maserati 4200 [6.00] 2006 E90 330d M Sport [0.00] |
I completely agree, if, when you say 'even', you mean 'the i still wins by a few points'
Mainly due to having the far superior manual gearbox Oh, this thread is fun...
__________________
Current -: MW E92 M3 Competition Pack / Qashqai+2 Tekna 1.6dci
Gone -: 370Z GT Roadster; BMW X3 3.0d xdrive M Sport; E46 330i M Sport Coupe; Mazda RX8 231; Nissan 350Z GT Roadster; BMW E90 330d M Sport; BMW E92 335i SE; Maserati 4200; Nissan 350Z; Honda S2000; Astra Coupe Turbo; Ford Probe |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 06:56 AM | #98 |
Banned
176
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Superior in that if it was used with a 35d engine, it would fall to bits? Whereas the 35d 'box easily copes with over 500lbs-ft?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 07:15 AM | #100 |
Banned
176
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 08:02 AM | #101 |
Brigadier General
192
Rep 4,655
Posts |
I never once had the 135i into BMW mate.... Well, I had one service and had them fix the ashtray under warranty as I had snapped something off it whilst trying to wrap it in CF...
The 335d was basically the same... Went in for a couple of things, neither of which was engine related. Matt |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 08:52 AM | #105 |
Banned
176
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
No no no you want a John Deere...
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 09:51 AM | #106 |
munich leg end
6
Rep 158
Posts
Drives: 320d M sport
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bristol
|
ahhh one day (if I fit enough dynamat) my 320d will sound like one of those ^^^
might even be able to make that quick if I get this upgraded intercooler sorted
__________________
320d M sport
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 11:30 AM | #108 | |
Colonel
75
Rep 2,396
Posts |
Quote:
I appreciate you will defend your car 'to the death' (whilst simultaneously slagging off anyone whose car doesn't fit you far-too-often spoken about lifestyle) but please don't try to force-feed me your bullshit. The fact that you assume people on here will believe whatever comes out of your mouth simply because you choose to state it is fact is more offensive and irritating than your general attitude. Independant test states E90 335d 0-100mph time @ 13.7 seconds. The same testing body states (using your example) Impreza STi is a second quicker at 12.7 The original Subaru Impreza turbo did 0-100mph in under 15 seconds. And that's ignorning there are are north of half a dozen factory spec "rally replica's" (not aftermarket tuned) from various manufacturers that could send you home with your ass in a sling in a straight line, let alone when some bends are thrown into the mix. I appreciate you're trying to make 335d friends, and think that by proclaiming your car to the best and rubbishing those of others you'll get a few people on-side and hopefully we'll all forget that terribly embarrassing point at which you were being ridiculed so much you threw your teddies from the surfboard and left us in peace for a while. BUT, some of us here are (knowledgeable) general car enthusiasts, not just E9*'s, so please don't mug us off with pub-talk garbage just so you can make some friends. It smacks of playground desperation to avoid being bullied.
__________________
Gone but not forgotten:
325i M Sport (E92), Black Sapphire, Coral Red Dakota, 19" 225's, Seat Heating, 6FL and de-badge Replaced by 6.2 litres of AMG powered C class. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 11:51 AM | #109 |
Colonel
75
Rep 2,396
Posts |
And, thinking about this a little more, why is an Impreza driver automatically labelled a chav?
You don't like it when you're labelled a boring, slap head with sofa castors where you wheels should be - quite the opposite, you get on your high horse and defend your choices, because they fit your lifetsyle and how we're all wrong for having large wheels. If you use the statement (and I'm paraphrasing, but it's close enough) "We're all individuals, we all have different requirements of our cars and this meets mine, don't judge my car choice" is it not massively hypocritical to then go and do exactly that yourself? Perhaps the Impreza driver has lifestyle requirements that demand he drives that car, or somthing similar? Perhaps he doesn't want to afflicted with part of the "BMW wanker" stereotype, which, given a lot of your posts, its clear this is a live and kicking.
__________________
Gone but not forgotten:
325i M Sport (E92), Black Sapphire, Coral Red Dakota, 19" 225's, Seat Heating, 6FL and de-badge Replaced by 6.2 litres of AMG powered C class. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-20-2010, 11:58 AM | #110 |
Banned
176
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Sheps - I have no idea what has rattled your cage but why the vitriol?
The ORIGINAL Impreza was quicker than the current WRX actually. Much lighter you see. And please show me your INDEPENDENT tests. Here, I have one: Ooh hang on - the readers car seems to be 13.3 seconds to 60. Oh and look here from Evo: Subaru claims 0-60mph in 4.8sec and 0-100 in 14.1 (for the PPP pack version) (we recorded 5.7 and 15.7 for the standard WRX) and neither seems far-fetched. It's the mid-range muscle that really does it. Whatever the gear, it kicks furiously from around 3500rpm and maintains a solid shove to 6000rpm, though from that point it starts to tail off. http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evoc...u_impreza.html So even the PPP pack version is slower to 100. Now any more pointless ranting and BS unsubstantiated claims to try and fling at me then Sheps? Thought not. Oh and look - http://fastestlaps.com/track44.html The 335d is not listed here but it beat the 335i by 0.1s to get 1.22.7. The STI you harp on about gets a mere 0.3 seconds better. A standard WRX is right at the BOTTOM of the table with 1.30.30. Better luck next time Sheps. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|