|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
The most concave wheels ever?
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-25-2010, 07:50 PM | #50 |
379
Rep 11,992
Posts
Drives: M3 (e92), X5 (E70), 428i (F32)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fremont, CA
|
Linea Corse LC818 Last edited by Zoeb@WheelDude.com; 07-26-2010 at 11:28 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2010, 10:23 PM | #51 |
Some say...
246
Rep 4,296
Posts
Drives: Fresh
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Baton Rouge n NOLA
|
I think the concavity on my MORR VS7s are pretty nice
__________________
I have exhaust and an intake... |
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2010, 11:50 PM | #53 | |
Major General
698
Rep 5,382
Posts |
Quote:
once i have enough money for new wheels i'll be getting 9.5 in the front and 10 in the rear.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2010, 05:33 PM | #54 |
Captain
84
Rep 920
Posts |
9.5 doesnt have any added benefit vs running a 8.5 or a 9.0. reason for wider rims is to be able to run wider tires. but non-M e9x cant accomodate for that so why tack on the added unsprung weight of wider rims? 9.0 is fine as it is.
there are different definitions of concavity. some see concavity as where the spokes on the outter part of the barrel concaves into the center. some see it as where the spokes sinks into the center only. of course, the first is more aesthetically appealing. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2010, 05:36 PM | #55 | |
Captain
84
Rep 920
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=410727 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2010, 07:14 PM | #56 |
Ground Clearance?
257
Rep 1,670
Posts |
9.5's look way better. end of story. especially when it comes to runnig wheels with concavity. if my e30 can have 8.5's it shouldnt be on my e90
plus, running an 8.5 and a 10 is a ridiculous difference. only making handling worse |
Appreciate
0
|
07-26-2010, 09:01 PM | #57 |
Banned
228
Rep 3,012
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-27-2010, 01:12 AM | #58 | |
Captain
84
Rep 920
Posts |
Quote:
porsche gt2: 9.0 front and 12 rear ferrari 458: 8.5F - 10.5R lamborgini lp-640: 8.5F - 13R but what do these manufacturers know about handling right? all 400+hp cars yet they dont widths larger than 9.0 fronts. lonestar says e90 running 9.5F is best setup and that's that. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-29-2010, 11:56 AM | #61 | |
Major
115
Rep 1,323
Posts |
Quote:
A good stagger on a typical front engine, rear wheel drive car is 1-1.5" difference front to rear. But it all depends on driving style and car setup. The concavity of the Alloy Technic B9 in 19x8.5 and 19x9.5 is really nice |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-09-2010, 12:39 AM | #64 |
Lieutenant Colonel
448
Rep 1,845
Posts |
l love the morr vs8 myself. if you are more on a budget, consider the alufelgen cs7s saw them in person the other day and though i love my vb3s they made me jealous.
__________________
2018 M3 Imola Red Competition package/Executive package/M Performance suspension
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-09-2010, 04:18 PM | #66 |
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
1166
Rep 5,448
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
^^^
OMG! That's super hot! I want me some Breyton Visions II but all I can find on Ebay is 20" Camaro sizes.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|