|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
335i suspension overhaul via M3 suspension + Ground Control (long & lots of pics)
|
|
12-16-2009, 02:57 AM | #45 |
pew pew
168
Rep 6,781
Posts |
+1. I'd be interested in replacing my OEM swaybar bushings (the ones that mount to frame) with the GC ones. I do not want to go with larger diameter swaybars, just change out the bushings for a better "feel."
__________________
CSL replicas are now CSL counterfeits. Jesus saves, like Valentine1.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2009, 03:05 PM | #46 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
4018
Rep 55,446
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Quote:
There is something about rod-ends people should know, they will slowly become noisy over time. If you often drive on rough roads, the noise will drive you crazy. Leave the rod-end links for dual purpose or race cars. Fact: We were the first one to install the M3 components on the 335i and 135i. It's exciting to see everyone else is finally getting around to this. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2009, 10:11 PM | #48 |
Speediance
14
Rep 152
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2009, 11:45 PM | #49 |
Private First Class
26
Rep 175
Posts |
Ground Control kits are looking pretty good now a days, especially with dyno matched Koni sports!
Just a couple observations" If you really want more control, though, I would suggest trying out some Hypercoil springs. At least the older Eibach springs were known to sag over time, and Hypercoil has just as good a selection of rates/ID/lengths. Did you measure the motion ratios of rear? I have a feeling that 525/650 will be rather understeery unless the rear has an unusually high motion ratio for a multi-link setup. Doing some quick calculations with your corner weights show that 525lb/in springs on the front (struts, assume MR of .99 or so), results in a ~2.3Hz natural frequency, that's quite a harsh ride for street. For track you will need some very very sticky tires, or a very very smooth track. Using a sporty yet more compliant natural frequency of 1.8Hz, the proper spring rate for the front works out to be roughly 287lb/in. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 12:55 AM | #50 | |
Speediance
14
Rep 152
Posts |
Quote:
Its cool that you seem to know the math behind suspension dynamics; your point maybe irrefutable. But sometimes I've seen that conclusions based on pure math can be quite contradictory to the actual driving experiences. Anyways, I'd love to know more about the math if you could point me to some article/resource. At the time of the post, I was running 430/550 springs, however, now I'm running 430/600. And according to my experience, the 430/600 ride is quite good even for San Francisco roads; very docile and tolerable. Not harsh, just firm, but BLOODY-WELL-DAMPED. And I like the 430/600 setup much more than the 430/550. I would strongly recommend it; its the best balance between ride-quality and performance. In my initial thread, I merely suggested that a 525/650 would be a great entry level autocross/track setup. However, I've had the car for a week with 525/600 setup, and the front was not harsh AT ALL, however you'd feel a thud when entering a dip and short fly when going out of it AT freeway speeds. Now you know why I switched it to a 430/550 setup (during the time I wrote the initial thread). And it has now changed to 430/600. I'm going to try out 500/650 setup. I will report back what I feel about it... However, I know that its going to "feel" much stiffer than what I have now. I am not sure how docile its going to be, but we'll see... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 01:08 AM | #51 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
4018
Rep 55,446
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Quote:
"Orb" and HP Autowerks already have all the math worked out over a year or year and a half ago. Lots of information have been posted here on E90post, even some suggested spring rates. Yet there will be others who go out on their own and try something they think might work or use they learn from the E36/46 days, which doesn't work on the E82/9X chassis at all. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 01:40 AM | #52 | ||
Speediance
14
Rep 152
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
I dont quite like how you responded; not at all professional of you. The 'smiley' is no excuse. So here is my response: 1) If you think you have all the math figured out and are obviously superior to others, than rest assured with that fact. There is NO reason to be defensive about it. Better products, better solutions always win! Have some faith! 2) I'm just a curious human being exploring all my options. And I'm simply sharing my experiences to people who I think would be most interested in finding them out. No one is being forced to read anything here; or atleast I hope not. I know, you are an active vendor here and a "suspension guru", but let me remind you, just like everyone else here on this forum, you dont have to read this! And if you think, I'm simply spewing garbage here, please find better use of your time. 3) You are most welcome to provide ideas and suggestions to make things better. It will only help the community out. 4) Please read my post previous to yours. Apologies for the direct and forward tone, but I think its fair and deserved. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 02:08 AM | #53 |
Supreme Allied Commander
4018
Rep 55,446
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Calculations were done as well as hours and hours of testing by "Orb", others, and myself. And I have driven on many E82/9x with various dampers and spring rates to make comparisons between them.
Suggestions are posted all over the place on this and other forums to help the community out, but why try something that is a given not to be an ideal set-up for our cars? I apologize if you took it the wrong way, I meant to help you, not want you to go down the path of others on the forums. If I remember correctly, I even gave you suspension suggestions over PM or phone several times in the past. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 02:23 AM | #54 | |
Speediance
14
Rep 152
Posts |
Quote:
But, its quite obvious your remark was crafted to undermine other people's knowledge/experience/satisfaction. Nonetheless, apology accepted. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 02:23 AM | #55 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
119
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
At least someone is looking for the truth. Just to help you get to the bottom of this the motion ratio are: F: 0.96^2 * spring rate = wheel rate R: 0.57^2 * spring rate = wheel rate The rear damper motion ratio is about 0.81 As you seem to know the frequancy is the only thing that matters. Orb |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 07:39 AM | #57 |
Major
34
Rep 1,381
Posts |
this thread is very informative i welcome new ideas you can never stop learning iv'e seen in the past when some guys said you cant have certain mods done to your car and someone did it (like install an e92 m3 diff on an e92 335i ) everyone has their own taste you just have to find what works for you
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 11:06 AM | #59 | |||
Private First Class
26
Rep 175
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://buildafastercar.com/tech/Spring-Rates http://www.rqriley.com/suspensn.htm Those are just some quick hits that came up on Google for the natural frequency of a suspension if you are intereted. The quick and easy estimate for spring rate is: natural frequency = 3.13 * sqrt ( (motion ratio)^2 * (spring rate) / (corner weight)) Technically you should be using unsprung corner weight, but that approximation is generally good enough. Of course, there are other parts in the suspension system like anti-dive/squat systems and sway bars that will change things, but sway bars will only increase your wheel rate. And then if we wanted to get the true ideal spring rate we will have to know quite a few other things like CoG, roll center, track, and motion ratio for the sway bars, etc. But generally the above formula will be a rather good approximation. |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 02:17 PM | #60 |
Private First Class
6
Rep 107
Posts |
I really like this ground control kit. I will have to talk to GC about what "custom valved Konis" means. Hopefully 60% critically damped and then digressive… I definitely want to chose my own spring rates.
As I understand it: 1. You want the frequencies roughly the same front and rear (10% higher rear for street cars, 5% higher front for race cars.) 2. Therefore wheel rates should be the roughly the same in cars with 50% weight distribution like most BMWs. 3. Which means that difference in motion ratios F and R is the difference in spring rates. Again, Roughly. (motion ratio f)/(motion ratio R) = .92/.32 = 2.9 rear spring rate should be around 3 times greater than the the front. My Conclusion: Anyone who sells suspension for the current 3 and 1-series hasn't done any analysis if he's got stronger front springs than rear springs. Or maybe they've done a lot more measuring than me, and the front camber curves are so bad, super heavy springs are needed. Though I doubt BMW did that! I think a little tweaking of this ground control kit, which they seem very willing to do, and we've got the most cost effective, high quality kit out there. Yay!! |
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 02:49 PM | #61 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
119
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
At least you noticed the high motion ratio in the rear suspension. The question is how detrimental is this in the system? How many vendors even think of this....lets say none. Orb |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 02:52 PM | #62 | |
Colonel
104
Rep 2,368
Posts |
I think custom valved means they will change the valving for each of the shocks to match your selected spring rates. This is quite important because there is probably a huge variance during manufacturing of the actual perfomance of shocks from the manufactuer. Plus depending on the strength of ur springs, youll need different dampening.
Also when doing the calculations, be sure to not forget about the sway bars... Sway bars add a lot of effective spring rate and changes depending on single rollbump vs roll situations. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 03:20 PM | #63 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 175
Posts |
I've always liked the few autocross cars I've driven on the street and track valved to 65-70% initial critical damping with a digressive knee at 3 in/sec. Most people I've talked to seem to feel that 65% is really the threshold where the excess motion gets a little too high below that.
Quote:
This applet should be useful in the future. It really is a shame that in order to have a competently set up suspension system you really have to build your own. Considering that none of the major manufactures really do their homework. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2009, 04:39 PM | #64 |
Speediance
14
Rep 152
Posts |
I'm not sure if I fully follow all the "motion ratio" talk; but I'm going to spend some time reading about it.
However, its ODD to see the following inconsistencies and contradictions. 1) From the "rough" calculations of motion ratios, if the ration of rear-spring rate to the front-spring rate is supposed to be 3, then how come some of the good suspensions like TCK (350/700) and KWCS (508/800) have ratios 2 and 1.57 respecitively. I would argue that GC (430/650) is similar to the KWCS, speaking in terms of ratios. 2) We all know that the front sway bars *a lot* stiffer than the rear ones, hence adding to the front spring rates. So the "effective" spring rate in the front should be higher, bringing the ratio close to 1.0 even more. In that case, how come a the following case is not viable where the rear spring rates are 10-20% more than the front ones. This is the case for KW V3, PSS10, and KW Clubsport (non M3). The above data is based on: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=235797 I dont know if it makes sense; like you all I'm trying to find some reason... It'd be great if someone could UNIFY all the variables down to some simple rules-of-thumb. Last edited by Speediance; 12-17-2009 at 05:03 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2009, 10:18 AM | #65 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
119
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
Start with basics with spring and dampers ….http://www.optimumg.com/OptimumGWebS.../TechTips.html If you like what you have then just call it done. It is not like your setup is wrong or anything but it is not going to be the smoothest ride either. It really depends on the goal you set at the begining which is what you wanted from your setup and that what mattters..do you meet that goal? Orb |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2009, 12:35 PM | #66 |
Moderator
647
Rep 10,863
Posts |
We really need to get a few cars together for a comparison test. Wonderful that we have several experienced suspension gurus working with the E9x.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|