E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > (torque curve + technical info) - Euro E92 335i turbo and 3.0 DI engine Power diagram



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-26-2006, 01:28 PM   #45
E90Fleet
Lieutenant General
South Africa
1330
Rep
10,187
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Africa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garissimo

Also, has anyone seen the size/location of the intercooler on the 335i?
Its in the thread with the official N54 pictures
__________________
BMW if you are reading, I need a job, Please.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:04 PM   #46
RPM90
Major General
894
Rep
7,047
Posts

Drives: 340i M-sport AT
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garissimo
23psi is crazy high boost! That can't be right. That's more than the Mitsu Evo's turbo cranks, out and that thing is turned up pretty high from the factory.

Also, has anyone seen the size/location of the intercooler on the 335i?
I doubt it too.
That much boost in a 10.2:1 compression ratio 3.0 liter inline 6 would be AMAZING HP with a very stressed engine.
Plus, those fist sized turbo's would be an amazing feat of performance if they could muster that kind of compression.

.6 bar seems quite plausible.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:13 PM   #47
goldminer
Lieutenant
Canada
26
Rep
453
Posts

Drives: 2011 SG E92 M3, 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stressdoc
IMO there is little doubt but that the engine management is very conservative, limiting power to avoid reliability issues and perhaps enhance fuel efficiency. The CR is 10.2. Boost is low and steady, 1.6 (about 3.5 in US lingo).
1.6 what? Bar? If so, 1.6 bar is about 8.7 psi of boost.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:18 PM   #48
goldminer
Lieutenant
Canada
26
Rep
453
Posts

Drives: 2011 SG E92 M3, 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garissimo
23psi is crazy high boost! That can't be right. That's more than the Mitsu Evo's turbo cranks, out and that thing is turned up pretty high from the factory.

Also, has anyone seen the size/location of the intercooler on the 335i?
In Europe they tend to quote turbo boost in terms of absolute pressure in the plenum (atmospheric pressure plus the boost). In north america we we tend to quote only the amount of boost over and above atmospheric pressure given by the turbo.

23 psi in Europe would be presented as 8.3 psi (23-14.7) here in north america.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:27 PM   #49
EnI
Secret Agent
EnI's Avatar
99
Rep
496
Posts

Drives: The Ultimate Joy Machine
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Planet BMW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldminer
In Europe they tend to quote turbo boost in terms of absolute pressure in the plenum (atmospheric pressure plus the boost). In north america we we tend to quote only the amount of boost over and above atmospheric pressure given by the turbo.

23 psi in Europe would be presented as 8.3 psi (23-14.7) here in north america.
Absolutely correct.

NA engine has 1.01325 bar pressure (= atmospheric pressure only), while this specific bi-turbo has 1.6 bar -> so 0.5875 bar (= 8.52 psi) actual pressure / boost added.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:31 PM   #50
ogrady
Lieutenant
ogrady's Avatar
92
Rep
473
Posts

Drives: AW 09 335
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rhode Island

iTrader: (0)

Nice we got some physicists on here

So the conclusion is that the turbo is running about 8.3-8.5 PSI??
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:35 PM   #51
EnI
Secret Agent
EnI's Avatar
99
Rep
496
Posts

Drives: The Ultimate Joy Machine
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Planet BMW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ogrady
Nice we got some physicists on here

So the conclusion is that the turbo is running about 8.3-8.5 PSI??
8.52 psi
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:39 PM   #52
goldminer
Lieutenant
Canada
26
Rep
453
Posts

Drives: 2011 SG E92 M3, 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cobradac
.....
and my torque conversion obtains from 400Nm the following
295.0248 ft-lb with no European/USA distinction.
I use the official formula from SAE TSB 003, dated 1999, where ft-lb to Nm for engines = 1: 1.355818.
While there is no distinction between a Nm or ft-lb between Europe and North America I believe there there may be differences in the conditions mandated for the test.

The new SAE horsepower rating system sets out very specific test conditions specifying such parameters as fuel and oil types to be used, accesories drives, intakes filters and exhausts which must be connected, corrections made for ambient temperature and humidity, etc. It may just be possible the required test conditions are slighlty different between DIN and SAE horsepower? Just a guess.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 02:42 PM   #53
goldminer
Lieutenant
Canada
26
Rep
453
Posts

Drives: 2011 SG E92 M3, 6MT
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregA
8.52 psi
This is correct. i was just doing an example conversion of the approximate estimate of 23 psi given in an earlier post.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 05:26 PM   #54
stressdoc
Moderator
stressdoc's Avatar
Dominica
646
Rep
10,863
Posts

Drives: BMW i8; Toy 4runner TRD pro
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Waco TX

iTrader: (0)

Bingo.
I should have noticed the "Ladedruck maximum absolut"
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 05:47 PM   #55
Garissimo
Captain
Garissimo's Avatar
15
Rep
645
Posts

Drives: 4 doors, 6 gears, 8 cylinders
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hippie Town, USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldminer
In Europe they tend to quote turbo boost in terms of absolute pressure in the plenum [...]
Ahaaa...it all makes sense now. Thanks for the clarification.

So I guess the question for people who are going to mod this car is, at what point will those little 'mini-Me' turbos be out of their efficiency range?
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 09:47 PM   #56
visor
BMW, can I have some LSD please?
visor's Avatar
Canada
91
Rep
1,591
Posts

Drives: 2017 F30 340i xDrive
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by E90Fleet
The new DI is only for europe for the moment, untilll more countries get the lower sulphure fuel
I know.
But I'm not referring to the increase in hp/tq for the DI engine.
I'm comparing the N52 on that table you posted with the current N52.

If you look at the column for the Valvetronic N52 (265hp/232lbft) vs. the DI N53 (272hp/232lbft), you'll notice there is an increase of 10hp/12lbft for the Valvetronic N52 engine over and above what we know it has produced in the past (255hp/220lbft). This is without the DI hardware.

So, somehow BMW was able to massage more hp and tq out of the N52 engine!
__________________
2006 330i | TiAg | Black | Al | 6MT | Sports Package | Logic 7 retired
2008 335i | AW | Black | Al | 6MT | Sports Package | Logic 7 retired
2013 328xi | Red | Gray | Al | 8AT | Sports Line | Premium | Executive | Heat Pkg retired
2017 340i xDrive | Estoril | Black | Al | 8AT | M Package
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 09:52 PM   #57
stressdoc
Moderator
stressdoc's Avatar
Dominica
646
Rep
10,863
Posts

Drives: BMW i8; Toy 4runner TRD pro
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Waco TX

iTrader: (0)

265 hp is the standard euro figure for the short exhaust version (130). I bet the torque figure is a typo.
Appreciate 0
      04-26-2006, 11:59 PM   #58
jasper
Private First Class
21
Rep
106
Posts

Drives: 2002 325i
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Ramon, CA

iTrader: (0)

those torque curves look highly suspect to me
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2006, 03:10 AM   #59
tctic
Major
Canada
40
Rep
1,238
Posts

Drives: BMW E90
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasper
those torque curves look highly suspect to me
I think they should be accurate considering BMW usually underrates rather than overrates these figures.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2006, 03:13 AM   #60
visor
BMW, can I have some LSD please?
visor's Avatar
Canada
91
Rep
1,591
Posts

Drives: 2017 F30 340i xDrive
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tctic
I think they should be accurate considering BMW usually underrates rather than overrates these figures.
What he means is that the N54's torque curve looks too table-flat to be realistic.
__________________
2006 330i | TiAg | Black | Al | 6MT | Sports Package | Logic 7 retired
2008 335i | AW | Black | Al | 6MT | Sports Package | Logic 7 retired
2013 328xi | Red | Gray | Al | 8AT | Sports Line | Premium | Executive | Heat Pkg retired
2017 340i xDrive | Estoril | Black | Al | 8AT | M Package
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2006, 05:05 AM   #61
EnI
Secret Agent
EnI's Avatar
99
Rep
496
Posts

Drives: The Ultimate Joy Machine
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Planet BMW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasper
those torque curves look highly suspect to me
It's not a fiction! It's reality!

What can I say: BMW! Bavarian Motor Works. That "M" (Motor) letter / word in "BMW" has a meaning. It's there for a reason.

Btw, BMW are going for the Engine of the Year award 2006 with the N54!

Appreciate 0
      04-27-2006, 05:27 AM   #62
EnI
Secret Agent
EnI's Avatar
99
Rep
496
Posts

Drives: The Ultimate Joy Machine
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Planet BMW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stressdoc
265 hp is the standard euro figure for the short exhaust version (130). I bet the torque figure is a typo.
Not at all.

Visor is right.

The N52 3.0L engine in 330i has an output of 258HP / 300Nm, while the N52 3.0L engine in 130i & Z4 3.0si can produce 265HP / 315Nm.

The engine in 330i has more conservative exhaust settings.
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2006, 07:33 AM   #63
Kalin
Second Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
251
Posts

Drives: F31 328xi
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Washington

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by visor
What he means is that the N54's torque curve looks too table-flat to be realistic.
It looks like marketing material vice an actual dyno output. Take the VW / Audi 1.8t engine for example... if you dummied the graph down for a powerpoint presentation to the media, it'd be flat like the N54 graph:

Appreciate 0
      06-12-2013, 08:14 PM   #64
black335i
Captain
black335i's Avatar
194
Rep
725
Posts

Drives: M 4
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: tx

iTrader: (2)

lol
Appreciate 0
      06-12-2013, 08:17 PM   #65
135Hoser
Banned
135Hoser's Avatar
Canada
39
Rep
315
Posts

Drives: '16 m4 zcp
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada, Eh

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by black335i View Post
lol
You bumped a 7 year old thread to say 'lol'?
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST