|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Downgrading -- 18" or 17"?
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
02-22-2019, 09:28 AM | #1 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 123
Posts |
Downgrading -- 18" or 17"?
Hey boys,
Moved to Puerto Rico and have been driving around in constant potholes, including highways. I'm running 235/35/19 front (3.2" sidewall) and 265/30/19 back (3.1" sidewall) and they cannot tolerate these roads without serious pain and damage. Just drove my buddy's Tesla on 235/45/18s (4.2" sidewall) and hardly felt any bumps at all. I'd like to downgrade but can't decide if 18" will be enough extra sidewall since the stock 18" sizes for my 2007 335i (Sedan) seems to be 225/40/18 front and 255/35/18, both of which have only a 3.5" sidewall. Can I tweak those 18 sizes to increase the sidewall without affecting the handling too badly? If not, will a 0.4" increase in sidewall (3.1 -> 3.5) make any difference? Should I consider 17s? Any help appreciated! Cheers. |
02-22-2019, 11:40 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant
204
Rep 525
Posts |
Remember that thousands of E9x left Germany with 17" wheels destined for NA. Thousands more left with 16" wheels destined for places with even rougher roads.
I wouldn't consider 18" in your shoes. With our car's designed circumference, 18" are for good roads/handling/racing. 17" for casual drivers. 16s for challenging conditions. 19" for people that want to look ricy. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 12:54 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
204
Rep 525
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
TheMidnightNarwhal2656.00 |
02-22-2019, 12:59 PM | #6 |
Major General
2656
Rep 6,287
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 09:39 PM | #7 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 123
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 09:56 PM | #8 | |
Private First Class
20
Rep 123
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-22-2019, 09:56 PM | #9 | |
Private
130
Rep 94
Posts |
Quote:
Hi, I'm from Puerto Rico. Currently running Apex arc-8 17s on my e92 with 245/45R17 & 255/40R17. I came down form having 19s which was horrible for roads here. Currently happy with my 17s. I always try to evade any pothole, but occasionally I run into some, and so far I have not bent/cracked any wheels. Once I took a huge pothole and tough I had destroyed 2 of my wheels, went to the tire shop and they told be that the wheels were fine. I do not know the measurements of my tires sidewalls tho. They are Michellin PSS (front) and Hankook RS-4 (rears) if you wish ti research. |
|
Appreciate
2
e92King0.00 |
02-22-2019, 10:07 PM | #10 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 123
Posts |
Hah cool man, which part of PR? I'm by Old San Juan. And according to tiresize.com you've got big 4.3" front and 4.0" sidewalls but your diameters are 25.7" in the front and 25" in the back. I'm not sure if having different diameters is a good practice?
Also if you check out this old thread of mine, I've had major rubbing problems when I first bought the car and it had a 275/35/19" rear (26.6" diameter vs your 25.7") We have similar looking rims, btw Last edited by slay2k; 02-22-2019 at 10:14 PM.. Reason: Fixed wrong numbers. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2019, 01:19 PM | #12 |
Brigadier General
3531
Rep 3,046
Posts |
I haven’t encountered any large potholes with this setup. But, I did in my E46 and it tore up the two left side tires. The suspension on my E92 is stock and my local Indy commented on how tight it drove. I’m not into the stretched look and I cannot imagine how firm a low profile tire rides.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2019, 01:26 PM | #13 |
Private First Class
14
Rep 106
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2019, 10:37 AM | #14 |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-25-2019, 12:24 PM | #15 | |
Private
130
Rep 94
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by JeanCa; 02-25-2019 at 12:30 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
2
e92King0.00 |
02-27-2019, 12:27 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
2440
Rep 4,330
Posts |
I have 245/40 18s.
it's nearly 4" of sidewall, none run flats. they still ride harsher than the factory 17" tire size. I'd go to 17's in your shoes. There are days I regret 18's. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-22-2019, 12:22 AM | #18 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 123
Posts |
[Update 9 months later]
So I've been running on the 17s for a long time now. Ride was comfy, but steering response slow and not to my liking. This became particularly noticeable when I upgraded suspensions to a Bilstein B12 w/ Eibach Prokit, and M3 front upper / lower control arms, which put me at close to -2 camber up front. The rest of the car was planted (no roll), but the tires were making it "laggy" and slow to respond. I swapped them out for my old banged-up 19s (VMR V713 19x8.5f, 19x9.5r) wrapped in Hankook Ventus V12 Evo2s and the steering response is MUCH better. Fun fact -- with a new suspension hitting bumps in the road is nowhere near as jarring as it was before! One of the rear tires developed a sidewall bubble whilst sitting on my balcony, so the shop temporarily gave me a Pirelli PZero Corsa, which meant I was running mixed brands on the rear. Upon flashing to MHD Stage 1+, I started to spin the rear tires easily, which I suspect is due to the mismatched tires, so now I have a decision to make. I need to decide what wheel size + tire combo will give me sharp steering response and enough grip to handle 400whp+ in the rear. I'm considering the following 3 options: 1) Put better tires (e.g. Michelin PSS) on my 17" rims, which are currently running Toyo Proxes Sports. Not sure if this would improve steering response / grip enough. 2) Buy a new set of 18" rims and slap some PSS tires on them. 3) Repair my 19s and put PSS tires on them. None of these are particularly cheap, but I know that at least with #3 I'd get to keep my sharp steering response. Not sure how 18s would fare, and definitely not feeling optimistic about 17s in that regard. Thoughts welcome! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-22-2019, 08:25 AM | #19 | ||
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm currently running Style 393 and factory tires (225/50/17) and can tell you that they "respond" better and have just as good, if not better, straight line traction @ ~400whp than the 245/40/18 DWS tires I had for ~60k miles previous...it's all relative. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
11-25-2019, 08:15 PM | #20 |
Private First Class
20
Rep 123
Posts |
All except the rear passenger tire are Hankook Ventus V12 Evo2s, staggered 19" config (235/35/19 & 265/30/19). The rear passenger is, temporarily, a Pirelli PZero Corsa.
What are "factory tires" and what is it about your setup that you believe makes it respond better (esp. WRT steering) ? |
Appreciate
0
|
11-25-2019, 08:26 PM | #21 |
Brigadier General
2001
Rep 3,731
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2019, 05:23 PM | #22 | |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
Quote:
Even though they are taller than my last set of wheels/tires, the stiffer sidewall and narrower size definitely adds to that "better response." |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|