|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Boost Control...
|
|
11-24-2007, 03:11 PM | #89 |
Major
24
Rep 1,310
Posts |
So if I hear this correctly, the spike IS there due to whatever cause, but the TMAP sensor doesn't see it for one reason or another and that's why no codes are thrown? Acutally, would a code be thrown if the car was otherwise stock and for some reason an overboost condition was encountered by the stock ECU?
I know it's been said before but I just cannot believe these cars don't come stock with a boost gauge in the instrument cluster.
__________________
Torque - The One You Love...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:21 PM | #90 | |
Major
24
Rep 1,310
Posts |
Quote:
Ordering boost gauge this afternoon if I can't find one in town to install this weekend...
__________________
Torque - The One You Love...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:30 PM | #91 | |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:33 PM | #92 |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:38 PM | #93 | |
Major
24
Rep 1,310
Posts |
Quote:
I would kill for a resolution to all of this...it's bugging the crap out of me. Should be interesting to see if we get some insight when Vishnu gets back to the office on Monday...
__________________
Torque - The One You Love...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:39 PM | #94 |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
FYI, I downloaded the 2.0.2 map (to reload the default values) and went for a drive. Everything was fine and it responded as it should with a single exception. One time when in 3rd at 3k revs, I floored it and hit 18 PSI and then it quickly dropped to 13 PSI and slowly ramped up from there; as it should.
When I floored it just below 2500 RPM, it went to 13 PSI without a spike. I floored it at 4000 RPM in 3rd and no spike I even gave it about 50% throttle at 2500 revs, which brought the boost up to about 10 PSI, and then floored it and it went to about 13 - 14 PSI without a spike. So, the issue would not be seen in the majority fo the cases. You really have to look for it. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:44 PM | #95 | |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
I too am dumbfounded as to the discrepancy. If there is enough range with the TMAP sensor, then there must be a physical reason. I am wondering if there is a phase change in the VANOS system which could cause a reversion in the intake manifold under these specific conditions. This may not be seen outside of the manifold... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:50 PM | #96 | |
Major
24
Rep 1,310
Posts |
Quote:
Back on topic...I hope when Vishnu gets back to the office on Monday they can read through some of the boost control/spike threads and possibly add some new information.
__________________
Torque - The One You Love...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 03:53 PM | #97 |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 04:02 PM | #98 |
Major
24
Rep 1,310
Posts |
Yeah, his previous car was a late model RX7 where he did the same thing. In the 5-series you wouldn't know it was heavily modded on the road. Idling it sounds like a corvette. Before the tranny blew up it dyno'd just over 520WHP. It's pretty quick... Nice to have the president of our company be a motorhead!
__________________
Torque - The One You Love...
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 04:56 PM | #99 | |
Private
3
Rep 57
Posts |
Quote:
With default 2.0.1 settings: WOT@2200rpm - no spike WOT@4000rpm - no spike I hit a 17+ psi spike must of the time when suddenly going WOT between those two ranges (2800rpm seemed like the magic number). Usually this was in 3rd but I got it to happen in 4th too. Also, I saw some oscillation up to 15.2 psi above 6000rpm whilst in 3rd (didn't have much time to observe this though!) Reduced the torque settings by 5% (i.e. 95% to 2000rpm, then down to 85% @3000-4000, then back to 95%@6000): WOT@3000rpm - max boost I could provoke was 16.4 and it was down in the high rpm band too. The spike is definitely still there with the reduced settings but not so large. I'm going to keep these 5% reduced settings alone for now. Scalbert, do you have any data logs you can share? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 06:10 PM | #101 |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 06:12 PM | #102 |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Not wanting to cast ill wishes, but I am glad to see someone else with the same results. I am thankful I am not alone on this.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 06:34 PM | #103 | |
Private
3
Rep 57
Posts |
Quote:
I'll get my laptop fixed and see what results I log. Very curious that your *logs* are pretty much expected (this is with 2.0.2 default map, right?). Let's hope Shiv can shed some light. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 09:31 PM | #104 | |
ocasionally in crisis
52
Rep 2,358
Posts |
Quote:
but whose guage is best for our 335s , and where the h*ll to put it ?
__________________
If your car isn't scary - it's just not fast enough !
RPI IC / UR catless DPs / JB3 2.0 beta / UR CAI / Quaife LSD / Snow Methanol Injection / VK oil cooler upgrade / Forge DVs / M3 rear sway / Riss catch can / Paddle shifting 6AT / M Sport steering wheel / Logic 7 / Dunlop Direzza Z1 255/235 / |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 09:35 PM | #105 | |
Major General
153
Rep 5,780
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71817 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 11:09 PM | #106 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
111
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
This did make me think that if there was a very minor leak the ECU may be adapting to it and overshooting under certain conditions so if this was the case then it may be possible that a mechanical device (diverter valve) is not responding predictably at certain boost levels. Hard problem to sort out as you can isolate sub system but you still have to view this as whole system and we have the PROcede as another variable. I know if you logged all the mechanical components retaining to boost that you should be able to determine the behavior when comparing it to another car with identical setup that has no problem. You did mention that the problem was repeatable at 3000 RPM right were the maximum amount of torque is produced so I assuming boost as well? Thanks for sharing….. Orb |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 11:52 PM | #107 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
111
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
Orb |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2007, 11:57 PM | #108 |
Major General
125
Rep 8,745
Posts |
First, excuse my ignorance. What if you uninstall Procede and do the same testing on the stock configuration. Would you be getting boost spike, although maybe less, in the range of RPMs (3k-4k)?
__________________
SB, Terra, 6MT. Only a few mods here and there.....nothing extreme!
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-25-2007, 12:07 AM | #109 |
Colonel
102
Rep 2,760
Posts |
Why not remove PROCede and see if it still spike stock?
Then if it does not spike stock you know its PROCede related. You guys being the guinea pigs will take the pain for everyone and maybe you should have those that benefit agree to compensate you for any damage your car gets because I am sure at least one person is going to suffer some damage. Just an idea.
__________________
E92 335 | Space Gray | Saddle Brown Dakota | Dark Burl Trim | ZPP | ZSP | AT | Idrive | 6FL | FBO | Dinan CAI | Quaife LSD | STG3 PROCede.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-25-2007, 12:08 AM | #110 |
Colonel
102
Rep 2,760
Posts |
Damn, beat me to it.
Beat me to it!
__________________
E92 335 | Space Gray | Saddle Brown Dakota | Dark Burl Trim | ZPP | ZSP | AT | Idrive | 6FL | FBO | Dinan CAI | Quaife LSD | STG3 PROCede.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|