E90Post
 


Coby Wheel
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N55 Turbo Engine Tuning and Exhaust Modifications - 335i Tuning > E90 N55 hp/torque numbers off ? NEED HELP



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-26-2020, 02:40 AM   #1
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
E90 N55 fbo stage 2+ hp/TQ numbers issue ? PLEASE HELP

Hey guys, I have a 2011 N55 E90 335i. Im in California and running 91 octane pump gas. It has the following mods:

VRSF chargepipe
VRSF Downpipe
VRSF 5" HD intercooler
VRSF street exhaust
BMS intake
NGK 97506 colder spark plugs
MHD stage 2+ ACN91

I am full bolt on with the proper upgrades and tuned. Recently dyno my car to see what numbers it makes. They turned out very interesting. 4 runs total on a dynojet. Doing research, I assumed my car would make ~ 350hp ( at least ) and ~ 380tq being on 91 pump gas mhd stage 2+ fbo. Unfortunately my numbers were not close at all. Best run I made 310hp and 432tq... very thrown off by these numbers. First two runs were fine and the last two runs, power/torque dropped significantly. Maybe due to a boost leak or heat soak but not too sure. I did not log.

It does not make any sense to be making 10 more hp from full bolt on and tuned. My torque number is way more than expected. Stock numbers are 300hp and 300tq. Very confused on how I only gained 10hp and 132tq ?? Can someone justify or explain what is wrong ? I also dont know why the line dipped during my last two runs. Any info will be helpful. Thanks !
Attached Images
  
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2020, 07:33 AM   #2
Sgop335
Colonel
Sgop335's Avatar
United_States
648
Rep
2,011
Posts

Drives: 07 335i e92, 08 535i
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: MD

iTrader: (1)

The axis is a litl hard to see but Actually looks like the car is making 400whp or more. At 5252rpm torque and hp are same. Congrats!
__________________
335i e92 TPC 19Ts
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2020, 01:12 PM   #3
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgop335 View Post
The axis is a litl hard to see but Actually looks like the car is making 400whp or more. At 5252rpm torque and hp are same. Congrats!
Both sides of the dyno graph are different axis. Left side is power and right side torque. The left side only shows up to 350hp and the right only shows up to 470tq. Also says max power = 309.99 and max torque says = 431.32
Appreciate 0
      07-26-2020, 02:02 PM   #4
bmw335ie90
Lieutenant
bmw335ie90's Avatar
534
Rep
432
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i M Sport
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Norcal

iTrader: (0)

The stock N55 makes 300 BHP. A dyno measures wheel horsepower. Factor in drivetrain losses, stock N55 would put down ~260 WHP.

Dyno results are not very useful without a baseline. You should have gone to dyno bone stock and got real WHP numbers to compare against.

Without logs I'm not sure what we can gather. Was boost on target? Was timing being pulled? What were your IATs? etc etc.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2020, 09:34 AM   #5
CoffeeBean
Lieutenant
226
Rep
553
Posts

Drives: 640i M-Sport GC
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: AL

iTrader: (2)

Your tq curve drops like a rock at 4k and the hp curve never rises after that. (peak tq will always be before/around 4k, which is why there's such a disparity between hp and tq) My guess is massive timing corrections, boost leak, or a lot of overboost causing the throttle to close. Like bmv335ie90 said, the only way to tell is with a log. Do you have any logs even before the dyno run? Probably would've been doing the same then.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2020, 11:34 AM   #6
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoffeeBean View Post
Your tq curve drops like a rock at 4k and the hp curve never rises after that. (peak tq will always be before/around 4k, which is why there's such a disparity between hp and tq) My guess is massive timing corrections, boost leak, or a lot of overboost causing the throttle to close. Like bmv335ie90 said, the only way to tell is with a log. Do you have any logs even before the dyno run? Probably would've been doing the same then.
Thanks for the information. I was surprised about the drop too and I only have found 1 other guy on 1addict with a very similar setup making similar numbers in California. Yea unfortunately I did not log, I am new to that and will purchase the data log on MHD today and try to post that as soon as possible.
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2020, 01:49 PM   #7
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmv335ie90 View Post
The stock N55 makes 300 BHP. A dyno measures wheel horsepower. Factor in drivetrain losses, stock N55 would put down ~260 WHP.

Dyno results are not very useful without a baseline. You should have gone to dyno bone stock and got real WHP numbers to compare against.

Without logs I'm not sure what we can gather. Was boost on target? Was timing being pulled? What were your IATs? etc etc.
Yea I wish I thought ahead and logged these runs. Would have shown my problem but I will start to log as soon as possible and post my data on here. Thanks
Appreciate 0
      07-27-2020, 10:46 PM   #8
whyzee125
Brigadier General
1676
Rep
3,641
Posts

Drives: Dinan stage 2 335i
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chattanooga Tn

iTrader: (0)

That's about what I'd expect for an N55. They always make gobs of torque with fairly minimal whp gains, unless you're using ethanol. 91 Cali gas is horrible so 310whp really isn't terrible all considered. Agree with the poster above that stock you're probably making 270 ish whp so a 40whp gain is likely a little more at the crank and about what you should expect. I don't think I've seen an E chassis N55 make 350whp without any ethanol, and definitely not on 91 octane.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2020, 02:43 AM   #9
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by whyzee125 View Post
That's about what I'd expect for an N55. They always make gobs of torque with fairly minimal whp gains, unless you're using ethanol. 91 Cali gas is horrible so 310whp really isn't terrible all considered. Agree with the poster above that stock you're probably making 270 ish whp so a 40whp gain is likely a little more at the crank and about what you should expect. I don't think I've seen an E chassis N55 make 350whp without any ethanol, and definitely not on 91 octane.
Gotcha. Thanks for the insight haha made me feel better about my numbers. Just was always seeing like 350hp etc and people always saying you'll gain 100hp fbo and tune. So was a little worried something was wrong.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2020, 11:36 AM   #10
whyzee125
Brigadier General
1676
Rep
3,641
Posts

Drives: Dinan stage 2 335i
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chattanooga Tn

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpy97ggg View Post
Gotcha. Thanks for the insight haha made me feel better about my numbers. Just was always seeing like 350hp etc and people always saying you'll gain 100hp fbo and tune. So was a little worried something was wrong.
Nope I think you're right about where you should be. If you have access to ethanol, an e30 mix with a tune should get you to 350.
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2020, 10:05 PM   #11
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Is there a difference between ACN 91 and OCT 91 on MHD ? Will there be a difference in power or anything ?
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2020, 12:48 AM   #12
Turbod
Major
Turbod's Avatar
United_States
396
Rep
1,210
Posts

Drives: 2014 E84 X1 35i M Sport
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Oregon

iTrader: (0)

I made 292 awhp and 305 awtq on my X1 stock, 92 octane fuel. You should always log your dyno runs as it will tell the full story. Ideally you would get a baseline on the same dyno before getting power pulls. I would say 310 whp is a little lower than what I would expect but not by too much. 325ish whp is what I would have guessed.
__________________
2011 E92 335i | 11.7@125 SOLD
2017 Camaro SS | 12.7@114 SOLD
2019 Audi TT RS | 10.5@130 SOLD
2020 F97 X3M | 11.0@123
2023 G80 M3 xDrive
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2020, 03:44 PM   #13
jpy97ggg
First Lieutenant
jpy97ggg's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
329
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW 340i
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ventura County, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 BMW 340i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbod View Post
I made 292 awhp and 305 awtq on my X1 stock, 92 octane fuel. You should always log your dyno runs as it will tell the full story. Ideally you would get a baseline on the same dyno before getting power pulls. I would say 310 whp is a little lower than what I would expect but not by too much. 325ish whp is what I would have guessed.
Yea I just was expecting more but I guess these numbers are normal for Cali 91
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST