|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
13 sec n52
|
|
06-26-2020, 04:37 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
203
Rep 437
Posts |
13 sec n52
sup yall my fastest 1/4 mile time with 3stage im, 330i BL tune,3.73 diff, aa headers, secondary cat delete, ran a 14.3@97mph. since both my disa failed ive switched to the stock IM and has been hesitant into replacing the disa valves because i still have passing power and still runs like of it was stock.
im thinking about switching to n54 intake manifold and getting a bcp tune for it. for those that has this setup is this a 13 sec setup for a n52? |
06-26-2020, 05:10 PM | #2 | |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
A lot of this also depends on your driving of course also.
__________________
Last edited by Biginboca; 06-26-2020 at 05:16 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
gT-BMW203.00 |
06-26-2020, 05:30 PM | #4 |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Oh and I had MILV’s when I made that run. Do you have MILV’s?
As far as I know I’m the only person on here who has posted that they broke into the 13’s and I never was able to before the N54. I think with MILV’s, Bobs tune, and the N54 you should be able to do it.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2020, 05:51 PM | #5 |
E82 Mudflap Ambassador
2214
Rep 2,219
Posts
Drives: '08 128i
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Orlando, FL
|
Fastest I've ran was 14.3 at 97 I think. At Bradenton Motorsports Park.
MILVS, AA headers, 3IM, custom Bimmerlabs tune with a MAF delete (in place is a Euro IAT), 3.73 diff Warm day, bad launches and I think my large DISA wasn't working well at the time. I'd love to try again! Also inb4 someone says THESE CARS AREN'T QUARTER MILE CARS! You're right, we're having fun. A day of runs down the strip cost like $25. A day at Sebring is like $500.
__________________
My 2008 128i - Sparkling Graphite/Beige - Sport pkg - 6MT - Click me!
Parents' 2014 528i - Mineral White/Ivory White - fully loaded Instagram @Andreys_128i and @Honda.Bito |
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2020, 07:55 PM | #6 |
Major General
3966
Rep 7,215
Posts |
1/4 mile racing isn't for everyone. But it's worth doing for fun. It's certainly not as easy as it seems, lol.
The N54 manifold bolts up, but the ports don't line up very well. You'd need an adapter or to slot the mounting holes to make it work best. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2020, 04:05 PM | #7 |
Slow.
3782
Rep 7,151
Posts
Drives: Single Turbo N54 on Meth!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Has anyone made a proper intake manifold for the n52 yet? Forward facing log tapered at the end with v stacks off the floor? Or better yet ITB trumpets to a box or with filters.
The stock n54 manifold is far from ideal. It works on the n54 because of boost. The front and rear cylinders have the worst airflow iirc. Nice to see n52s going to the strip. I would hope they have a high 13 1/4 run with minimal modifications, no cams, head work, real NA mods etc. Just simple bolt ons and a tune.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2020, 04:19 PM | #8 | |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
BPC got 265whp with basically a manifold delete as pictured below. The n54 manifold set up with complete air filter, manifold, throttle body, and a air density tune (maf delete) tested around 258whp on similar set up (same exact dyno and same model car, 128i manual.) So it seems like going beyond the N54 manifold isn’t the best place to focus for meaningfully more power on the N52. The exhaust cam or exhaust lifter swap Cobra Marty has alluded to likely would be more promising.
__________________
Last edited by Biginboca; 06-28-2020 at 04:26 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
Torgus3781.50 |
06-28-2020, 04:49 PM | #9 |
Slow.
3782
Rep 7,151
Posts
Drives: Single Turbo N54 on Meth!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
So take an n54 manifold, band saw half of it off, and put a filter on it? Seems simple enough for someone to make some money off selling it.
NA mods as so expensive per HP. Really got to be committed to an NA engine to make good NA power above 100 hp per liter.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2020, 05:14 PM | #10 |
Major
883
Rep 1,413
Posts |
Biginboca
With dragy in your toolset, notice any significant differences in run times between whatever wheel set you had before to the squared ARC-8s? (I'm trying to reconstruct this sentence, because it sounds dumb, but potty time is coming to an end and I'm sure you grasp the intentions of that question)
__________________
See you, space cowboy.
Supercharged |
Appreciate
1
Torgus3781.50 |
06-28-2020, 06:03 PM | #11 | |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2020, 06:15 PM | #12 |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
I did some digging and definitely don’t have records for the wheel swap. I did find this data which I never posted.
The January 2019 runs were with the AFE stage 2 intake, 79mm WCR Big Bore Throttle Body and a 4” elbow connecting the 2. Plus the misaligned N54 manifold. The March 2019 runs were with a stock US Airbox with ram intake mod, 77mm N54 Throttle Body, and 3.5” piping connecting the 2. (I reduced the piping diameter based on a bunch of research I did that made me think 3.5” will work better for our cars because it keeps the velocity up with less diameter transitions through the tract), and the N54 manifold shimmed to align to the head properly. Three of these runs had a 2.18 60 foot and one was 2.25 60 foot, so they are good to compare: As you can see the aligning of the manifold plus slightly reworking the intake tract using stock parts with a ram mod produced a 1mph gain with the same ET. That 1mph gain could be as much as 10hp! (This is why I do not recommend fancy air boxes just mod your stock junk. There’s a bunch of threads which confirm this data too.) When the weather turns cool in the fall I can’t wait to get some new runs. Since those the car has had another Airbox swap to the euro Airbox whose cone filter that has about 30% more area than the US panel filter I was using. (And I added gold heat tape for Torgus lol) Plus the car is about 150lbs lighter now than it was when I did all those runs, and by the time fall comes I expect to have another ~60lbs off the car too.
__________________
Last edited by Biginboca; 06-28-2020 at 06:40 PM.. |
06-29-2020, 07:18 AM | #13 |
Major
883
Rep 1,413
Posts |
Biginboca
That's what I'm hecc'n bout. I know you're a Floridian and all that ~ the sunroof important to you? Panel that bad boy? EZ weight loss. ( I need some of that IRL weight loss.. this driver mod? Whew, dawgy...)
__________________
See you, space cowboy.
Supercharged |
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2020, 11:00 AM | #14 | |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
4
|
06-29-2020, 02:05 PM | #15 |
Major
883
Rep 1,413
Posts |
Quote:
I AM HAPPY AS F TO SEE THIS. This was my dream for the sedan 😭 I was trying to get my hands on a m3's roof — but I was so uncertain if it was gonna work. How else you shedding weight?! That looks so sick, Al!!!
__________________
See you, space cowboy.
Supercharged |
Appreciate
0
|
06-29-2020, 04:55 PM | #16 | |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
Quote:
M3 Composite Front Bumper Carrier (-8.4lbs) M3 Composite Rear Bumper Carrier (-11.7lbs) Seibon Carbon Hood (-25lbs) OEM Carbon Roof (-44lbs) Seibon Carbon Trunk (-12lbs) Antigravity Battery (-37lbs) Arc 8 18x9 ET30 Wheels with Falken FK510 255/35r18 (-25lbs vs old set up VMR V710 w/Hancook Ventus) Total = -163.1lbs off the car. Plus some other weight loss from headers and exhaust mods too.
__________________
Last edited by Biginboca; 06-29-2020 at 05:36 PM.. |
|
06-29-2020, 05:56 PM | #17 | ||
Colonel
996
Rep 2,287
Posts |
Quote:
How many pounds can the driver loose? |
||
Appreciate
1
Noir883.00 |
06-29-2020, 06:04 PM | #18 |
Colonel
996
Rep 2,287
Posts |
On a serous note;
These cars/n52 are really great. I could not imagine talking about this type of performance for a 3 liter motor In a family sedan back in the 90's. Hell if you look at the so called muscle cats from the 60-70s there"re actually Phenomenal. Don't fixate on HP numbers but look at actual 0-60 or quarter mile times. There pretty sweet |
06-29-2020, 06:12 PM | #19 |
Colonel
3764
Rep 2,738
Posts |
This driver about 20lbs! But that’s harder than swapping parts, definitely cheaper tho lol
__________________
|
09-02-2020, 05:48 AM | #20 |
New Member
8
Rep 29
Posts |
how many HP loss you reckon with a failing DISA?
I dyno'd mine with a broken DISA and I modded it afterwards, while fixing the DISA as well. When I returned to the Dyno, I had no clue what the mods HP gain were, and what the DISA fix HP gain was.
__________________
E92 330i N52K 200kW (EU)
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-02-2020, 04:11 PM | #21 |
Colonel
626
Rep 2,099
Posts |
I'd wager its about 20WHP you're missing. I dyno'd mine with a broken DISA and I was coming up about 30HP or so less than people with similar setups that posted here. So put some room for variation/minute differences/temp and I'm guessing you could lose as much as that.
This is all pretty depressing though...this means my old Sentra is faster than most of us in terms of 1/4 mile. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-03-2020, 04:17 AM | #22 |
New Member
8
Rep 29
Posts |
Sounds steep, but could be right. It went from 238 crank HP to 275 HP after repairing big DISA, installing catless headers, Mishimoto rubber boot and MILVs. It was tuned on a Bapro dyno, so very accurate at calculating parasitic losses. Was a bit disappointed that after all the hard work, the figures were only 3 HP up from the manufacturer's claimed 272 HP stock.
__________________
E92 330i N52K 200kW (EU)
|
Appreciate
1
E92William1998.00 |
Bookmarks |
|
|