|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Best Intake for 2011 BMW 335i N55
|
|
10-25-2016, 09:06 AM | #23 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
245
Rep 1,595
Posts
Drives: 2011 335i xDrive Msport
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Orlando
|
Quote:
His statement is valid *IF* he can prove the aftermarket filter is not providing adequate protection and that the stock intake is not causing much of a restriction (which we know to be true for the stock turbo). I would like to see one of the 550whp guys switch from stock intake to an aftermarket and see if there is much of a difference. We know there isn't under 400whp.
__________________
2011 335Xi 6AT - VRSF catless DP - VRSF 7" FMIC with turbo inlet pipe - VRSF chargepipe - Pure Stage 1 turbo - JB4 - E30 - xHP Stage 3 - Strongflex tension bushings - Whiteline RSFB - UUC rear swaybar
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:22 AM | #24 | |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
Quote:
As for performance gains, well that data is here already but I would love to hear you explain how an aftermarket hot air intake is better than the stock intake that draws in ambient air. Not to mention MAF concerns and I have plenty of experience with custom turbo kits and MAF tuning. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:24 AM | #25 |
Brigadier General
1161
Rep 3,189
Posts |
There is always a benefit when removing a restriction preturbo, way more than any NA engine. Stock filter is garbage, I actually felt a difference when I switched to the K&N drop in (stock filter was only a month old). To state that upgrading your intake or filter only increases how much dirt that gets by it is retarded. What dirt is possibly getting by these filters, dust, pollin? Real detrimental.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:24 AM | #26 |
3441
Rep 79,211
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
Quote:
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:25 AM | #27 | |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
Quote:
And yes, I agree that there is a point that a custom intake is a necessity. People looking to make that kind of power don't start discussions about bolt on intakes so I think I am safe is assuming the OP is looking to stay at near stock HP levels. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:26 AM | #28 | |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
Quote:
In terms of its ability to filter particulates well? Yes. For example the 20B (3 rotor 500HP NA) Rolex RX-8 race cars run OEM paper filters because they were often finding sand in their oil pans when running in places like Florida, Cali, etc. Examples: |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:32 AM | #29 |
3441
Rep 79,211
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
May I ask which filters they were using when they found sand?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:39 AM | #30 |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:48 AM | #31 | |
3441
Rep 79,211
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
Quote:
I know companies like AFE make specific type of filters for different applications. For example, they have specific for off road, where it may see more dust or dirt. Where as K&N is primarily focused on street vehicles / Race applications and is supposed to meet or exceed the OEM standard specification for filtration. They also conduct their own testing in their facility. Just as an example: http://www.knfilters.com/images/factstab1.gif http://www.knfilters.com/images/factstab2.gif I'm wondering if those other filters may not have been fitting well, possibly causing a leakage where the medium wasn't actually contacting the filter. At any rate, I guess if people are driving in extreme conditions of dust or sand, they should think otherwise. But I do know plenty of guys in the off road scene that had no problems with their actual vehicles to date because of filtration on a K&N, for example. For a race car with a fairly exposed intake, I could see there being a larger demand for a high filtration intake. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 09:50 AM | #32 |
3441
Rep 79,211
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
To add, here is the SAE standard for testing air filters, done by K&N.
The testing procedure used is SAE J-726 using ISO Test Dust. This test is the standard of the air filter industry. The test procedure consists of flowing air through the filter at a constant rate (airflow rate is determined by the application) while feeding test dust into the air stream at a rate of 1 gram per cubic meter of air. As the filter loads with dust the pressure drop across the filter is increased to maintain the prescribed airflow rate. The test is continued until the pressure drop increases 10" H2O above the initial restriction of the clean element (in this case .78" to 10.78" H2O). At this point the test is terminated. The dirty filter element is then weighed. This weight is compared to the clean element weight to determine the total Dust Capacity. The amount of dust retained by the filter is divided by the total amount of dust fed during the test to determine the Cumulative Efficiency. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 10:15 AM | #33 |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
There are plenty of independent filter tests out there, I would never trust anything from the manufacturers or the people selling them. And of course most won't have an issue with engine damage due to the increased ingestion of debris and it surely does matter where you live and what debris your car may ingest, even factory schedules advise you to change your air filter more often if you live in a harsh environment.
But if there is no performance gain then adding a filter that doesn't filter well seems dumb to me. Personally I do my best to keep dirt out of my engine. But I get people wanting the cool sound that an aftermarket intake typically gives, especially on a turbo car. But they should be aware that some intakes can screw with the MAF scaling due to not being the same size as the OEM and this is where complaints about rough idle, etc come from and they should know that they will not be getting the best filtration available to them in the stock intake. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2016, 10:38 AM | #34 | |
3441
Rep 79,211
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
Quote:
I'm personally a fan of quality aftermarket intakes / filters but it's not something worth going back and forth on. You have your reasons to stay with what you like and I can't say I necessarily disagree with your reasoning. Different strokes for different folks, I say. |
|
Appreciate
1
9krpmrx8808.00 |
10-25-2016, 10:40 AM | #35 |
Captain
285
Rep 615
Posts
Drives: '11 E92 335xi 6MT
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Rockville, MD
|
You're using rotary engines as an example of grit from the intake making its way into the oil, but rotary engines have a lot more oil going into and out of the combustion chambers than piston engines. Generally speaking the oil in a rotary is going to collect a bunch more crap in it than a piston engine. It's not a proper comparison.
Let's simplify this. On our cars, an intake is not going to make a massive improvement in power. Maybe 5 hp, if that, and some fun whooshy whistly turbo noises. If that's what somebody wants, it's not going to kill their motor. If you want to run a paper filter, go ahead, it's not a big deal either way. |
Appreciate
1
Geo_33534.50 |
10-25-2016, 10:52 AM | #36 | |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
Quote:
But yes, running an aftermarket filter is not going to grenade your engine. As stated, it comes down to a personal choice. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2016, 04:15 PM | #38 | |
Second Lieutenant
33
Rep 209
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 E92 335i ///M Sport in SGM/ 19" Forgestar CF5V/
Pure Stg2 Turbo/ Pure inlet/ GFB DV /Fuel-it Stg2 LPFP/BMS intake/ JB4 ISO BMS BEF/AR Design DP/ ER CP/Wagner FMIC/ Wavetrac LSD/BMW PE/ KW Street Comfort / MusicarNW Level Two Audio Upgrade/CDV delete/3000K HID Fogs/ N20 plugs/ JB4 BT Rev3 |
|
Appreciate
1
BKBMW335I156.50 |
10-26-2016, 06:38 PM | #39 |
Lieutenant
73
Rep 527
Posts
Drives: 2011 E82 135i, 2015 F15 X5 35D
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NY
|
There is also racing dynamics carbon fiber cai which looks like a copy of the gruppe m cai for a third of the price. Still expensive for an intake but looks like a nice option.
http://www.racdyn-usa.com/PROD/142+52+87+102.html |
Appreciate
0
|
10-26-2016, 06:49 PM | #40 | |
Second Lieutenant
60
Rep 227
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-27-2016, 10:29 AM | #41 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
245
Rep 1,595
Posts
Drives: 2011 335i xDrive Msport
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Orlando
|
Quote:
__________________
2011 335Xi 6AT - VRSF catless DP - VRSF 7" FMIC with turbo inlet pipe - VRSF chargepipe - Pure Stage 1 turbo - JB4 - E30 - xHP Stage 3 - Strongflex tension bushings - Whiteline RSFB - UUC rear swaybar
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2016, 05:21 AM | #43 | |
Captain
90
Rep 671
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-28-2016, 11:06 AM | #44 | |
Clean is the new cool, keep it that way.
808
Rep 1,685
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|