|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Alignment result
|
|
05-05-2017, 06:52 AM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
25
Rep 202
Posts |
Alignment result
Have done an alignment today, how do these figures look?
Arent the figures from left to right be the same? Setup Front 19x8.5 ET35 225/35/19 Ride height 595mm with 10mm spacer Rear 19x9.5 ET33 255/30/19 Ride height 585mm without any spacer Planning to get 5mm spacer for the rear. I found that the front is rubbing against the front inner liner, e.g. the vent for the oil cooler. Any suggestion? maybe more negative camber would help? compared to the previous alignment result, is the new one better or more suitable with my setup above? New alignment Old alignment |
05-05-2017, 09:37 AM | #3 |
Second Lieutenant
25
Rep 202
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2017, 04:11 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
827
Rep 3,189
Posts |
Pricey, $110 is good
Darwin I had to pay $600 That was including changing ride height and adjusting camber plates Last edited by Brule; 05-05-2017 at 10:52 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-05-2017, 09:33 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
114
Rep 410
Posts |
Quote:
As an example Front axle camber used is -33' +/-30' (-1°.03' - -0°.03') when it's specified -33' +/-25' (-0°.58' - -0°.08') Further Front axle toe used 0°.07' +/-0°.6' (0°.01' - 0°.13') when it's specified 0°.14' +/-0°.04' (0°.10' - 0°.18') So the Front axle camber has fallen inside the specification but the Front axle toe is slightly negative and outside the specification. The Rear axle you can interpret yourself given it has been highlighted now. The old alignment 'B'report looks similar to a John Bean. The camber and toe for both axles has been specified exactly according to BMW specifications. However the ride height range is incorrect. Rear height 582mm - 602mm Front 606mm - 626mm Given it has not been measured and is based on 19" rims with a low slung suspension. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|