For the price of a loaded 335i

Year's_End · 09-07-2009, 10:56 PM

Definitely a badass and perfectly viable option compared with the 335i.

So much more street presence. So much faster. Apparently handles well and has perfectly satisfactory steering feel, as well as being easily controllable with throttle.

And the interior is leaps better than its predecessor, but not really to the level of the bimmer's. Whatever, it looks nice anyways.

'Cane · 09-07-2009, 11:25 PM

No thanks.

lauer87 · 09-07-2009, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asdflkijd

With less than a grand worth of mods, you can also enjoy seeing that car in your rear view mirror.

Put that same thousand into that supercharged Ford and see what happens.

ejazbmw · 09-08-2009, 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asdflkijd

With less than a grand worth of mods, you can also enjoy seeing that car in your rear view mirror.

how so?

quagmire · 09-08-2009, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asdflkijd

With less than a grand worth of mods, you can also enjoy seeing that car in your rear view mirror.

Put that grand into a Corvette and you can see both cars in your rear view mirror( like it needed any mods to do it anyway).

Plus, I have seen the new GT500 be clocked 0-60 in 4.2-4.4 seconds. Going to take a lot more then a grand to get a 335i down to that level......

montreal red · 09-08-2009, 12:12 AM

there are always more powerful cars for the money...its a fact of life...

for a fully loaded e92 m3, you can practically get a GTR which is a much faster track car...

blue2fire · 09-08-2009, 12:18 AM

Ford.

/thread

Year's_End · 09-08-2009, 12:57 AM

What's wrong with Ford^

stimpy · 09-08-2009, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quagmire

Put that grand into a Corvette and you can see both cars in your rear view mirror( like it needed any mods to do it anyway).

Plus, I have seen the new GT500 be clocked 0-60 in 4.2-4.4 seconds. Going to take a lot more then a grand to get a 335i down to that level......

Isn't the 0-60 on a JB3/Procede 3.9-4.1?
________
Mazda Carol

jlstyle · 09-08-2009, 01:10 AM

This is the second nastiest looking car behind EVO.
Wouldn't drive it even if it was half the price of 335i.
Much rather drive civic than this.

Year's_End · 09-08-2009, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jlstyle

Wouldn't drive it even if it was half the price of 335i.
Much rather drive civic than this.

pfft ok.

Mu Mu · 09-08-2009, 05:54 AM

Unfortunately, on this side of the planet, that car costs almost two times as much as a 335, so no thanks!

MisterSkiMask · 09-08-2009, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purespeed

I think you are correct...but most anything with Shelby on it is generally $$$$$$.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have that monster.

I think it is a cool car too. It is on my radar, I have never had a burnout car and I think that could be fun for a couple of years. I would have to pick one up lightly used to justify it. It is a good looking car.

deletedelete · 09-08-2009, 10:35 AM

The regular mustang has possibly one of the worst interiors in the entire car industry. I have no idea if the shelby is any different. At least that shelby has a real hood scoop. The normal mustang has a FAKE one, lol.

quagmire · 09-08-2009, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prowess Symphony

The regular mustang has possibly one of the worst interiors in the entire car industry. I have no idea if the shelby is any different. At least that shelby has a real hood scoop. The normal mustang has a FAKE one, lol.

Are you judging the interior compared to a BMW and other high end vehicles or are you comparing the Mustang to vehicles more around its price and class?

Because I think the Challenger is the worst offender when it comes to cheap interiors for a $20K muscle car.

deletedelete · 09-08-2009, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quagmire

Are you judging the interior compared to a BMW and other high end vehicles or are you comparing the Mustang to vehicles more around its price and class?

Because I think the Challenger is the worst offender when it comes to cheap interiors for a $20K muscle car.

Just in general given the price considerations, not to a bmw which costs more. But yes I agree, dodge interiors are worse. Absolutely they are worse. I hate dodge/chrysler interiors more then any other easily.

quagmire · 09-08-2009, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prowess Symphony

Just in general given the price considerations, not to a bmw which costs more. But yes I agree, dodge interiors are worse. Absolutely they are worse. I hate dodge/chrysler interiors more then any other easily.

I have been in worse interiors then the Mustang. Camry, Cobalt, Sebring to name a few....

NewSong · 09-08-2009, 11:02 AM

I'm a proud BMW owner.

No way would I drive American, they handle like boats, and are heavy as tanks.

All they are good for is loud, loud noise, and the interior looks like it was made in some sweat shop.

I would rather drive my son's plastic Tonka Truck than that car.

deletedelete · 09-08-2009, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quagmire

I have been in worse interiors then the Mustang. Camry, Cobalt, Sebring to name a few....

Sebring yes. New camry isnt awful imo. Bland and full of plastic but I can understand the target demographic they were going for. Ill have to look up and see the cobalt.

quagmire · 09-08-2009, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prowess Symphony

Sebring yes. New camry isnt awful imo. Bland and full of plastic but I can understand the target demographic they were going for. Ill have to look up and see the cobalt.

Then why can't you understand the demographic of Mustang buyers? The Mustang's interior is decent enough to please most of their owners. They aren't looking for an amazing interior, but an awesome engine and performance.

MisterSkiMask · 09-08-2009, 11:33 AM

It can be difficult to look at an interior in the context of the cars price, I have had this problem myself. You really have to, and also consider what else you are getting for your money, that is to say, where did the designer/mfg put all of their money when they built the car.

I try to look past the materials themselves and look at how all the pieces fit together, is it squeaky, are the gaps good, do lines match up, etc. With this approach I have been very impressed with the Ford and GM products that I have looked at. I had a Ford Focus as a loaner and for its price it was a nice little car, fit and finish were very good, and it had standard equipment that would cost thousands as options in a Porsche.

deletedelete · 09-08-2009, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quagmire

Then why can't you understand the demographic of Mustang buyers? The Mustang's interior is decent enough to please most of their owners. They aren't looking for an amazing interior, but an awesome engine and performance.

I just saw that the mustang has a redesigned interior which is nicer then the one from last year. Just because the car is inexpensive doesnt meant the interior has to be a big thing of plastic like the ford or dodge. The camaro in the same range has a nice interior, the 350z, the gti all have better designed interiors where the ford just looks like it uses part from the ford bin. Most of the interior is found in the other ford line up. Just my opinion.

09-07-2009, 10:56 PM	#23
Year's_End Lieutenant General 1135 Rep 12,444 Posts Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: FL iTrader: (0)	Definitely a badass and perfectly viable option compared with the 335i. So much more street presence. So much faster. Apparently handles well and has perfectly satisfactory steering feel, as well as being easily controllable with throttle. And the interior is leaps better than its predecessor, but not really to the level of the bimmer's. Whatever, it looks nice anyways. __________________ Past: '08 E92 335i\|ZPP\|ZSP\|6AT Past: '15 Mustang GT\|401A\|PP\|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350\|6MT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-07-2009, 11:25 PM	#24
'Cane Major General 8482 Rep 5,359 Posts Drives: 2022 Aventurin/SS G82 xDrive Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Florida iTrader: (0) Garage List 2022 M4 Comp AWD [8.00]	No thanks.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 12:12 AM	#28
montreal red chris 278 Rep 12,144 Posts Drives: White Boat Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Toronto iTrader: (31)	there are always more powerful cars for the money...its a fact of life... for a fully loaded e92 m3, you can practically get a GTR which is a much faster track car... __________________ Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW 2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 12:57 AM	#30
Year's_End Lieutenant General 1135 Rep 12,444 Posts Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: FL iTrader: (0)	What's wrong with Ford^ __________________ Past: '08 E92 335i\|ZPP\|ZSP\|6AT Past: '15 Mustang GT\|401A\|PP\|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350\|6MT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 01:10 AM	#32
jlstyle Lieutenant Colonel 355 Rep 1,762 Posts Drives: Porsche Panamera Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: USA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2014 Audi S7 [0.00] 2015 BMW X5 [0.00]	This is the second nastiest looking car behind EVO. Wouldn't drive it even if it was half the price of 335i. Much rather drive civic than this.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 05:54 AM	#34
Mu Mu First Lieutenant 7 Rep 353 Posts Drives: BMW 330i Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Johannesburg iTrader: (0)	Unfortunately, on this side of the planet, that car costs almost two times as much as a 335, so no thanks!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 10:35 AM	#36
deletedelete Major General 361 Rep 5,873 Posts Drives: m Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: usa iTrader: (14) Garage List 2013 e92 M3 [0.00] 2011 e93 M3 (sold) [0.00] 2009 335xi (sold) [0.00]	The regular mustang has possibly one of the worst interiors in the entire car industry. I have no idea if the shelby is any different. At least that shelby has a real hood scoop. The normal mustang has a FAKE one, lol. __________________ ---> Click For xi/xDrive Suspension Compatibility List <---
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 11:02 AM	#40
NewSong Just another jerk in a hat... 117 Rep 1,462 Posts Drives: 2005 Ford Focus Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Irvine iTrader: (0)	I'm a proud BMW owner. No way would I drive American, they handle like boats, and are heavy as tanks. All they are good for is loud, loud noise, and the interior looks like it was made in some sweat shop. I would rather drive my son's plastic Tonka Truck than that car. __________________ He brought me up also out of a horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and established my goings. And he hath put a new song in my mouth. Last edited by NewSong; 09-08-2009 at 11:26 AM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-08-2009, 11:33 AM	#43
MisterSkiMask Banned 147 Rep 2,014 Posts Drives: I Can not say Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: you must not know iTrader: (0)	It can be difficult to look at an interior in the context of the cars price, I have had this problem myself. You really have to, and also consider what else you are getting for your money, that is to say, where did the designer/mfg put all of their money when they built the car. I try to look past the materials themselves and look at how all the pieces fit together, is it squeaky, are the gaps good, do lines match up, etc. With this approach I have been very impressed with the Ford and GM products that I have looked at. I had a Ford Focus as a loaner and for its price it was a nice little car, fit and finish were very good, and it had standard equipment that would cost thousands as options in a Porsche.
	Appreciate 0 Quote