|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Realoem exchange
|
|
01-17-2020, 03:54 AM | #1 |
Brigadier General
3058
Rep 3,909
Posts |
Realoem exchange
Please can someone explain what 'nonexchangeable retrospectively', 'exchangeable retrospectively', and 'bilaterally exchangeable' (and any other similar terms) mean on realoem.com? I find them so confusing!
Thanks |
01-17-2020, 04:09 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
3058
Rep 3,909
Posts |
Here's an example:
https://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/par...&q=61610427668 Realoem is recommending #427668, but that part was superseded by #159627 (nonexchangeable retrospectively), then #455435 (bilaterally exchangeable). So I'm assuming that #159627 is not compatible with my car, since the car didn't come with them from the factory. But it looks like #455435 should fit fine? But if that's the case, how does 'bilaterally exchangeable' differ from 'exchangeable retrospectively', in practical terms? |
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2020, 05:11 AM | #3 |
General
17306
Rep 18,733
Posts |
Bilateral is just a fancy word for "both ways", so to me the terms "bilaterally exchangeable" and "exchangeable retrospectively" mean the same thing.
I'm stumped on an example of "nonexchangeable retrospectively". The only scenario I could think of is say if BMW changed the design of the OFH. You could bolt on a new-design oil filter housing and the old design's oil filter element would not fit the new OFH design.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2020, 05:24 AM | #4 |
Brigadier General
3058
Rep 3,909
Posts |
That's basically what I figured, but surely there must be a difference between bilaterally and retrospectively...otherwise why have 2 different terms? Seems strange, but then so is the terminology!
That's also basically what I thought about nonexchangeable; the part would fit, but is incompatible with other parts around it. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
exchangeable, realoem |
|
|