|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Help Diagnosing Poor Fuel Efficiency (VANOS solenoids?)
|
|
01-06-2023, 03:58 PM | #1 |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
Help Diagnosing Poor Fuel Efficiency (VANOS solenoids?)
My car has been drinking gas like a fiend and I'm curious for input on likely culprits. Estimating roughly 14MPG city, 18 highway with an average of 16MPG. Recently reset the MPG module and haven't been driving hard so the numbers are a bit...disappointing.
First inclination is to replace the VANOS solenoids since they haven't been done (103k on the odometer). They're pricey little units so it would suck if they didn't make a difference. Hoping to get a little input before proceeding. Any thoughts? |
01-07-2023, 12:54 AM | #3 |
Major General
2655
Rep 6,286
Posts |
I mean I seem to average around 14L/100KM (~ 17 MPG). I thought that was normal unless you baby drive it strictly. I'd say around 12L 100/KM (19.6 MPG) on highway from what I recall. I wouldn't start shooting the parts cannon.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-07-2023, 04:27 AM | #4 |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
Okay I guess this is normal then? No error codes. Remember reading 19 city 24 highway somewhere but must have been mistaken...My buddy gets 19 with his V8 e39. Figured a ten years newer V6 might do better =/
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-07-2023, 09:39 AM | #5 |
Lieutenant
369
Rep 423
Posts
Drives: 2007 E93 MT6
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: The Old Dominion
|
I don't get people with healthy 335i's saying that sub 20mpg - even in city driving - is normal. Even driving like an absolute maniac asshole with my manual transmission, I have never seen poor mileage like that. I have healthy twin turbos that sit in moderate commuter traffic on a regular basis (15 miles each way, some stop-n-go, plenty of hills and traffic lights), and I average 25/26mpg without even thinking about it. I can get north of 28 if I pay attention to the throttle on green lights, and coasting. Best I ever got was 31 mpg cruising at a steady 72mph on flat highway.
I regularly use 93 octane, although when I have used 87, the mpg goes down. Years ago when my VANOS solenoids were gummed up, I took a rough idle/mpg hit, but again, never below 22mpg or so. For those with persistent poor mpg, using proper octane is a given. Also, clean plugs, functioning coils and clean air filters are the easy first fixes. I would also suggest that if your car has over 100k miles, a walnut blast of the intakes is a MUST. Doing so helped my engine run smoother, and gave me an mpg boost.
__________________
BMW: Doing Amazing(ly cheap) Things With Plastic (crap) Since the E90...
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 04:54 AM | #7 | |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 04:55 AM | #8 |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 04:05 PM | #9 |
Major
2089
Rep 1,478
Posts |
It used to be reported higher but seems the feds don't want the masses complaining.
https://blog.amsoil.com/how-to-impro...r-gas-mileage/ https://afdc.energy.gov/files/pdfs/2876.pdf This study is for oxgenated fuel not or crap Ethanol and Ethanol attracts water which has no energy so I'm sticking to what I saw a few years back with 5% Last edited by M-technik-3; 01-09-2023 at 04:13 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 04:21 PM | #10 |
Major General
2655
Rep 6,286
Posts |
When you mention 31 mpg, are you referring to the instant read fuel economy or you reset your computer and then read the number it says after having only driven on the highway? My numbers are the average MPG is shows in the iDrive but if I do the instant read one, I can definitely hit 31 MPG as well cruising on a flat highway at 120km/h.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 04:24 PM | #11 | |
Major General
2655
Rep 6,286
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 07:17 PM | #12 | |
Lieutenant
369
Rep 423
Posts
Drives: 2007 E93 MT6
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: The Old Dominion
|
Quote:
31 mpg averaged out over several tens of miles on cruise control for extended period - not instantaneous MPG. This was on a post walnut blast, plugs/coil refresh extended test drive. I mean, the originally advertised mpg was 30 highway anyway, so not surprising.
__________________
BMW: Doing Amazing(ly cheap) Things With Plastic (crap) Since the E90...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 07:47 PM | #13 |
Major General
2655
Rep 6,286
Posts |
I mean that is surprising tbh because advertised MPG is actually 20 combined, 17 city and 26 highway. Are you talking about the N54 or maybe N52 (328I)?
Last edited by TheMidnightNarwhal; 01-09-2023 at 07:52 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-09-2023, 11:06 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
369
Rep 423
Posts
Drives: 2007 E93 MT6
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: The Old Dominion
|
[QUOTE=TheMidnightNarwhal;29718235]I mean that is surprising tbh because advertised MPG is actually 20 combined, 17 city and 26 highway. Are you talking about the N54 or maybe N52 (328I)?
Hm….Im in a 2007 335i convertible with M/T. N54 twin turbos. I always thought the highway rating was 30, but I just checked fueleconomy.gov (managed by the EPA), and it says 17/26, 20 combined, so I stand corrected on the official stats. But those numbers bear no resemblance to what I am seeing, although part of that may be due to my having a dual cone intake, so free-er flowing air may make a difference. Maybe the motor being, shall we say…”well broken in” gives it overall reduced internal friction than a new per one? Interestingly, visitors to the site are able to self report individual mpg. One convertible 335i owner did, in fact, report 31.7 average mpg in largely highway driving.
__________________
BMW: Doing Amazing(ly cheap) Things With Plastic (crap) Since the E90...
|
Appreciate
1
TheMidnightNarwhal2654.50 |
01-09-2023, 11:45 PM | #15 | |
Major General
2655
Rep 6,286
Posts |
[QUOTE=E93Dude;29718774]
Quote:
For me it's 17 city, 24 highway and 19 combined. I guess I will do some testing myself this summer. I'm around 16mpg right now. But yeah I thought the consensus was that these ratings were actually difficult to reach lol. But I tend to floor it it's difficult to try just babying it to test lol. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-10-2023, 05:34 AM | #16 | |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-10-2023, 12:00 PM | #17 |
Enlisted Member
53
Rep 47
Posts |
just for fun (and im guessing here) but whenever i think anything could be problematic with vanos solenoids I always also take a look at the check valves
just a thought fwiw in my lci e91 I always fill with 93 octane and have never been able to get my mpg readout to rise above 18.9mpg i dont do a ton of highway and that is mostly city driving its always bugged me that the mpg is not higher |
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2023, 04:52 AM | #18 | |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2023, 02:13 PM | #19 |
cap
15
Rep 55
Posts |
Update: main issue identified as brake drag due to lack of grease on the caliper guide pins. After greasing those little buddies and resetting the fuel economy tracker I’m back up to 19mpg (with heavy footed driving, stop and go traffic, and a couple “Italian tune-ups”).
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|