|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
N52 Serpentine Belt, tensioner, idler pulley
|
|
03-21-2020, 10:01 AM | #1 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
N52 Serpentine Belt, tensioner, idler pulley
Before I get to the nuts and bolts, I want to say that it feels a bit weird to discuss something as trivial as my e90 during the COVID-19 crisis; for me it is a welcome distraction from the troubles. That said, I hope all of you, your families, loved ones and friends are infection-free and holding up well under the circumstances.
Now to the car. Last weekend I did a DIY replacement of the serpentine belt, tensioner, and idler pulley on my '06 325i (n52 engine). For the parts, I purchased the OE kit from FCP Euro, which has the contitech belt and other parts made by INA. The tensioner includes the replacement bolt. The job went well; however I have a lingering uncertainty. (Note: others have raised a similar concern in other threads.) The concern is the alignment of the belt on the tensioner pulley. The front edge of the belt is aligned with the front edge of the pulley. There is no overhang, thankfully, but the belt is not centered on the pulley. I am the original owner and this is the first replacement of these parts. The belt on the original was centered on the tensioner pulley, as confirmed by the wear on the original pulley. I have not been able to determine why the belt is riding off-center on the new one. I am concerned that the center of the force imparted by the belt on the pulley is off center, which could lead to premature failure of the tensioner pulley. So, what caused this? The belt looks to be correctly aligned on all other pulleys. It is centered on the idler pulley, alternator, power steering, etc. That suggests that the problem is with the tensioner itself. Do any of you have any experience with this issue? Any insight appreciated. Thanks and take care all. Jim |
03-21-2020, 10:05 AM | #2 |
Private First Class
103
Rep 130
Posts |
That is about what mine looks like as well and I replaced the idler pulley recently. On the idler pulley, there is ~2 mm between the belt and the front of the pulley.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 10:41 AM | #3 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 11:21 AM | #6 |
Private First Class
103
Rep 130
Posts |
I guess on the tensioner there is a little space between the edge of the pulley and the belt.
That distance appears larger on the idler pulley. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 11:26 AM | #7 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
Yes. I'd say yours looks better positioned than mine. I have not extra pulley surface in the front; the extra surface is all in the back. It's strange since the idler is centered and on the factory tensioner pulley the belt was centered. I am wondering if the replacement is slightly off-spec, or if I did something wrong when I installed it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 11:34 AM | #8 |
Private First Class
103
Rep 130
Posts |
Hopefully others will chime in with data. I have never done the tensioner on the E90 so can't comment on steps that could have been mishandled.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 12:03 PM | #10 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 12:22 PM | #11 |
Major
399
Rep 1,076
Posts |
First, you didn't purchase an OE kit from FCP, which would have come with BMW stamps. You may have purchased an OEM kit, which means original equipment manufacturer, this means the same company that makes parts for BMW made your part.
Second, I bought the same kit from FCP because my belt was running over the edge of the tensioner pulley, and I was surprised that after I installed all the new parts, the belt was riding just at the edge of the pulley. Not over the edge, but at the edge. I'd go have a beer, and not worry about it. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 12:32 PM | #12 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 03:44 PM | #14 |
Brigadier General
2440
Rep 4,331
Posts |
I replaced mine with the contitech kit 56K miles ago.
the belt has always ridden very near the front edge of the tensioner. there was a spacer in the box, but when I installed that it was far worse to the rear. There was no spacer on the BMW part I removed and instructions for if you needed it or not were incredibly vague. I check it every once in a while, but t's never changed and it hasn't been a problem. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 04:15 PM | #15 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
Quote:
Thank you for sharing that experience, very helpful. The replacement tensioner did not have a spacer in the box, unless it was mounted on the part and I missed it. The idler pulley did come with a large disc, like a washer, on the screw behind the pulley. The original factory idler pulley had the same washer so I installed the replacement with the washer on it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 04:27 PM | #16 |
Brigadier General
2440
Rep 4,331
Posts |
maybe that's what it was for.
I remember a spacer/washer of some sort and not using it. it was 56K miles ago after all. regardless, mine has always ran right at the front edge of the tensioner pulley and it's been fine. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 05:19 PM | #17 | |
Art Collector
2424
Rep 3,449
Posts |
Quote:
As for OEM, they say it's a company whose quality is high enough that they manufacture original equipment parts for automakers in general. I've always seen OEM as the same thing that FCP would consider "OE," but I do think their description makes sense. To your original post: I've also replaced my tensioner, idler, and belt with the Contitech kit from FCP. I can't recall definitively if my belt rides right at the edge of the pulley, but it probably does... I seem to remember noticing it, running the vehicle, and then concluding everything looked fine.
__________________
When I'm dead, just throw me in the trash.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 05:41 PM | #18 |
Lieutenant General
1908
Rep 13,099
Posts |
Had mine replaced at local Indy same thing .
The original didn't do that. I commented on it and he verfied that it does gives me quesy feeling knowing what I do about the if the belt come off. I am wondering if its the mounting bolt. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 05:43 PM | #19 |
Colonel
1006
Rep 2,243
Posts
Drives: 2007 328i / 2014 M235i
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
|
Mine rides 1/16" over the edge, I have 120,000km and it's all original. I don't think it will ever run off, there are 6 grooves tracking it.
I think ppl replace this prematurely, if the belt gets oil on it then yes absolutely. I will eventually change it only because of how it fails |
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 06:56 PM | #20 |
Private First Class
29
Rep 134
Posts |
my belt is closer to the front edge by a mil or two. as long as the belt isn't isolating while running and stays at the same position i think it will be fine, based on new oem parts used on my car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 07:10 PM | #21 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 107
Posts |
Quote:
Newtis gives a "jointing torque" of 25 Nm -- and an angle of rotation 90 deg. My torque wrench does not have a metric scale, so I looked up the conversion and saw that 25 Nm = 18.44 lb-ft. I set the torque wrench at roughly halfway between 18 and 18.5 lb-ft to approximate 18.44, erring on the low side. I do not have an angle guage, so for the 90 degree rotation I used a sharpie to make a mark on the bolt head at 12 O'clock. Then I turned the bolt very slowly until the sharpie mark reached 3 O'clock. Of course, the torque wrench is not 100% accurate, and my method of eyeballing the 90 degree rotation is not precise. I am curious about how forgiving the bolt is to any imprecision in the torque applied. In other words does executing the specified torque + rotation take the bolt close to the failure point, or does it leave a margin for overshooting the mark due to measuring inaccuracy. By the way, I realize I am being obsessive about this thing, but failure of the tensioner pulley would do significant damage to the engine -- failure is not an option. Jim Last edited by subframe; 03-22-2020 at 07:00 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-21-2020, 07:35 PM | #22 |
First Lieutenant
87
Rep 301
Posts |
You should be good. I had replaced the tensioner on my N52 as I noticed the belt was trying to "walk" off of the tensioner.
I didn't have the time to order the part so I got one from NAPA. I just replaced the tensioner but the belt now sits a few mm's back off of the tensioner pulley. Just keep an eye on it and have that Corona with a lime. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|