|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
17" vs 18" Wheels and Fuel Mileage
|
|
11-08-2012, 07:42 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
411
Rep 3,049
Posts
Drives: 2009 BMW 335d
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
17" vs 18" Wheels and Fuel Mileage
In the summer on my 18" wheels I'd be getting 7.5L/100 km or 31.4 mpg. Now with my 17" winter wheels I'm getting 5.4L/100 km or 43.5 mpg. This is highway mileage that I'm talking about.
It must be the tire size? |
11-08-2012, 08:17 PM | #2 |
Ex-Diesel Driver
63
Rep 2,000
Posts |
Could be wheel weight or tire compound too.
__________________
FS: HRE Center Caps http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...post13972317l] |
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 06:28 AM | #3 |
Brigadier General
411
Rep 3,049
Posts
Drives: 2009 BMW 335d
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 07:11 AM | #5 |
Brigadier General
229
Rep 3,489
Posts
Drives: Montego Blue 335d
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Puerto Rico(Dominican Republic 03/2017)
|
I believe its the tire size
__________________
RENNtech Flash(Lenny Wu)/WAGNER IC
Enkei Rajin 18"/Execuhitch Hitch/Koni FSD Soft Ride Bike Rack/Brava Synthetic Motor Oil(Made in Puerto Rico)/Meth(in the works)/CBU done w Andrew EGR Race Pipe (whoa! what an animal it is now) |
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 12:26 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
411
Rep 3,049
Posts
Drives: 2009 BMW 335d
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 01:32 PM | #9 |
First Lieutenant
12
Rep 332
Posts |
I have the same setup...
Maybe the colder air results in a mileage decrease? I thought the colder air was 'denser' and provided a better mixture (at least for gassers...) - what about for oil burners? |
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 02:24 PM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
411
Rep 3,049
Posts
Drives: 2009 BMW 335d
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 02:40 PM | #12 |
Captain
158
Rep 866
Posts |
The difference could be a combination of lower rolling resistance, lower air resistance, higher air pressure, different diameter, and change in driving style. Dunno.
PL |
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 03:35 PM | #13 | |
New Member
0
Rep 23
Posts |
Quote:
What is your range per tank (KM travelled per tank)? What speed are you cruising to get 5.4 L/100KM? When I drive on the 400 series in Toronto it is impossible to drive below 120 KM/Hr and in most instances I am driving at 140 KM/Hr which is why my average fuel consumption is around 7.6 L/100KM. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 06:22 PM | #14 |
Colonel
614
Rep 2,410
Posts |
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...d-tires-tested
Some interesting stuff in there that relates to your question. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-09-2012, 09:03 PM | #15 |
New Member
1
Rep 17
Posts |
Yup. In addition to the car and driver article there was a truck comparison a few years back. The results showed that by going from stock to larger wheels the truck lost 2 secs 0-60!
From personal experience, my LR3 lost a little over 3 mpg just going to a little larger tire! |
Appreciate
0
|
11-10-2012, 06:43 PM | #17 |
Major
27
Rep 1,110
Posts |
225 is likely the biggest effect, but there is something going on more than just that...probably driving habits and average speeds, as well.
In the summer, I average ~7.2-7.5 mixed with 235/255 18's. So far, I see 6.9-7.3 with the winters and similar driving habits. 235/255 > 225 is a noticeably narrower width and likely influences consumption. The only way I ever get into the 5.3-5.6 range is by driving at or below 100km/h...not a very easy thing to do in this car. Cheers D.
__________________
2016 GLE 350d - White on Black
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|