|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
94W Load Rating vs 91W
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-03-2008, 04:21 PM | #1 |
Captain
289
Rep 864
Posts |
94W Load Rating vs 91W
Ok - so my current tires (OEM Run-Flat Bridgstones) show a Load Rating of
91W FOR THE front tires and 94W for the rears. I am interested in UHP tires but need input because the RE760 Sport tires I want to purchase will be 94W in the front. . . Question: Does it really matter - harsh ride or what? |
03-22-2011, 03:30 PM | #3 |
General
1568
Rep 29,202
Posts |
As long as the load and speed rate are above the minimum the car needs, it's okay.
__________________
F10 520d M-Sport Alpine White | HRE P43SC 20x9+20x11 | Michelin PSS 255/35+295/30 | KW V3 Coilover | M5 Front Sway Bar + M550d Rear Sway Bar | 3DDesign Front Lip | BMW M Performance CF Spoiler | BMW M Performance Diffuser | BMW M Performance Black Grills | BMW M Performance Pedals | |
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2011, 06:43 PM | #4 |
Banned
55
Rep 1,495
Posts |
Not entirely true. I'm not sure how much of an effect it has, but the higher the load rating the stiffer the sidewall and the more it will effect your scrub radius. Higher to a point is good, but it does become detrimental at some point. So, I am bumping this for someone who knows how to calculate these things to chime in.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|