|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Concise e90 vs f30 comparison
|
|
02-19-2019, 05:51 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
1659
Rep 3,621
Posts |
Concise e90 vs f30 comparison
I saw this nice comparison between the two models from an owner of both on a YouTube video comment, by user Andrew Davidson. Here's his opinion:
"So I own both vehicles and I'm just going to make some points for any future buyer watching this video. The f30 is definitely more modern, with a more aggressive exterior and sexier, more functional interior, all angles and lines considered. the f30 has a plethora of available features that are super cool and add function and practicality to the car in ways the e90 lacks, so make sure to find one that was close to or fully loaded. the f30 is generally more reliable (though both are reliable) but more importantly , easier to fix. I do all my own maintenance on both and some of the engineering tricks they used for the f30 maintenance is a godsend- seriously, were talking an hour less or more for some of the same jobs. the f30 auto transmission is miles ahead of the e90. I had an e90 manual once upon a time but now both are autos, so idk about the manuals. Probably comparable. The f30 has adaptive modes and suspension (optional). This is amazing. It's like hitting a "change personality button." Soft? Sure. Rough and sporty? Sure. Eco mode to get 23.5 mpgs? Why not. Now the e90... the e90 is definitely more solid in the interior. The f30 interior is cheaper in feel in virtually every way- chalk that up to the lighter plastics they needed to save weight over the e90 (~120lbs) and cost cutting. Between the two, you'll notice the difference straight away and the e90s will definitely last longer. The f30 has creaks and rattles at 60k that my e90 doesn't at 135k miles. the e90 feels much more sporty. It's stiff sport suspension and tight, heavy steering wheel with it's amazing hydraulic rack are untouchable by the f30, which, even in sport+, feels soft. Seriously, a tad too much roll. With the e90, You are one with the road- with an f30, you're just some passenger on top of the road. It's a massive difference, and why I guarantee you that unless you're a pro driver, you'll be faster in the e90 than you would be in an f30 (around corners, track, autocross). The f30 is faster on paper but the confidence... Is non existent. The feedback is just too vague. (this probably makes the f30 a better daily/casual car). And that's it! One last thing... GET ONE WITH THE OPTIONAL PREMIUM AUDIO! seriously, the Harmon kardon surround in these cars (13 speaker in e90, 16 in f30) is amazing. They have DSPs, and if you don't know what that means, it means it sounds amazing. Bass, trebble, all of it. Good luck!" |
02-19-2019, 06:14 PM | #2 |
Brigadier General
2170
Rep 4,986
Posts |
That seems about right from what I’ve experienced. Used an f30 3 or 4 times in variance environments. I did love the endless front end grip of the f82 M4, but that interior was rental grade cheap, imo.
Didn’t know the f30 was that much easier to work on - wonder what he’s referring too, specifically. They didn’t make the e90 easy, that’s for sure... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 09:48 PM | #3 | |
Colonel
1006
Rep 2,243
Posts
Drives: 2007 328i / 2014 M235i
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
|
Quote:
I think the styling of the interior and exterior on the f30 are great. I didn't know they cheapened the interior, interesting. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 10:04 PM | #4 |
Major
598
Rep 1,343
Posts |
It easier to work on maybe due to housing a 4-cyl engine in a bay designed for for 6-cyl engine.
In terms of reliability I think it's comparing to the n54 E90. There's no way current gen BMW engines are more reliable than the n52. There's a certain unquantifiable solidity to the E90 that somehow the f30 is unable to duplicate. The driving dynamics is unquestionably superior with the E90. But that's for those that appreciate such traits. Most owners can't tell. The pervasive X-drive f30 variants further dulls out the experience. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 10:19 PM | #5 |
Captain
356
Rep 928
Posts
Drives: 2007 328i Coupe, ZSP, Premium
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Knoxville
|
The F30 makes all the sense in the world if you view it as a 5 series. It's about the same size as the E39, it offers MT, has more rear legroom, and is a great daily driver. But it's not a genuine BMW 3-Series like the e90, e46, e36, and e30 are.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2019, 11:16 PM | #6 | |
Brigadier General
2170
Rep 4,986
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
whyzee1251659.00 |
02-19-2019, 11:28 PM | #7 |
Brigadier General
1659
Rep 3,621
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2019, 05:08 AM | #8 |
General
17162
Rep 18,676
Posts |
My experience with both cars is, the E90 has Ultimate Driving Machine DNA and the F30 doesn't.
|
Appreciate
2
Bobh5952.00 CTinline-six6816.00 |
02-20-2019, 07:38 AM | #9 | |
Major
488
Rep 1,309
Posts |
Quote:
When the e46 came out, people said it wasn't the ultimate driving machine that only the e36 and e30 had mastered. I wonder when F30 will be added to that list. |
|
Appreciate
1
whyzee1251659.00 |
02-20-2019, 08:23 AM | #10 | |
Hoonigan
6816
Rep 3,000
Posts
Drives: '09 328i, '98 Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Connecticut
|
Quote:
I have to disagree with the review on the maintenance and reliability points. I helped my friend install a charge pipe on his F30 335i with the N55 and it was still a major PITA with no room to work. The 4 cylinder has more room, but you still have all of the turbo components in the way. I guess it really depends on if you are comparing F30 N55/N20 to E90 N54. The N52 is easier than all of them to work on. Reliability is also something I disagree on. The F30 is a newer car, so naturally it shouldn't have as many parts wearing out yet. My thoughts are down the road the F30 will have the same reliability as any other turbo BMW. With that said, I don't think the F30 is a bad car, just closer to a 5 series than the E90. I'd still take a RWD/X-Drive F30 over a FWD sedan like an Accord or Camry, and the Lexus offerings look pretty hideous IMO. Not much of an Audi fan either. Even the lowly 320i is not a terrible car to drive in the grand scheme of things, and IMO is much better looking than the new G20.
__________________
"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
-Dr. Ian Malcolm, Jurassic Park |
|
Appreciate
1
whyzee1251659.00 |
02-20-2019, 08:23 AM | #11 | |
General
17162
Rep 18,676
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2019, 08:40 AM | #12 |
Colonel
1006
Rep 2,243
Posts
Drives: 2007 328i / 2014 M235i
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Ontario Canada
|
Here is a good used vehicle summary of the F30, with details of the failed tensioner, reduced Gs and longer breaking distances.
https://www.wheels.ca/car-reviews/bu...-bmw-3-series/ |
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2019, 08:44 AM | #13 |
Captain
193
Rep 666
Posts |
No one is really comparing apples to apples with the F30s. I drove a 340i LCI sport; I would take it over my 335i any day - the interior felt much higher quality than the first-gen F30s. The chassis felt completely different too, much stiffer with close to zero roll. They really did improve on that car in the LCI versions.
I'm keeping my eye out for a CPO 2017+ 6MT right now, hard to find!
__________________
BMW GT1 (INPA, DIS, WinKFP, ect..), ISTA/P & /D is up and running! PM me if you want to stop by and code your car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2019, 09:00 AM | #14 |
Major
488
Rep 1,309
Posts |
^^ I had a 440i LCI for a couple days while my e91 was in for recall work, and I'm with you on this. Didn't feel cheap. Not a neon. Swapped seats with the girlfriend and she said it felt anemic and floaty, so i said 'oh right, hang on' and switched it from eco to sport, and the grin only got wider from there.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2019, 09:16 AM | #15 | |
General
17162
Rep 18,676
Posts |
Quote:
Current car models are not analog. They are practically completely computer controlled, so all of the engineering design effort to create the excellent 3-series chassis can be now be artificially and easily produced via electronic control of the steering, brakes, throttle, differentials, and suspension damping (thank you to Ford and the Explorer/Firestone debacle). And that is where I see the F30 marks the death of the BMW DNA. While the E90 has a lot of the computer control just mentioned, it still retained the BMW DNA. The F30 just doesn't have it. Even BMW can admit to it, as the F30 LCI update changed the design of the front suspension in an effort to regain some the the BMW steering response. Want to drive the follow-on to the E90? Go drive the Cadillac ATS. Cadillac chased the BMW DNA very hard, and finally found it; too late though, as the sport sedan marketplace (defined by the 3-series) moved on to abandon chassis dynamics in favor of iDrive capabilities (people love new tech in the form a apps...). People now like SUVs, because they are programmed to maintain stability far better than an analog version of such a design could allow, while giving the packaging better suited to family life. But in the end Physics always wins, and you get to see SUVs on their roofs... Maybe the G-series regains some of the DNA; lack of a manual trans for the US market doesn't make me too hopeful that I'll buy one (I'm well past due for a new sports sedan). BMW has moved on and has the sales numbers to prove it. Old guy's opinion....
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
|
|
02-20-2019, 02:21 PM | #16 | |
Enlisted Member
11
Rep 39
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|